Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
48
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 48 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 29 35 47
1440p QHD 40 40 54 66
1080p Full HD 46 49 66 84

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 47
3840x2160 Medium 35
3840x2160 High 29
3840x2160 Ultra 25
2560x1440 Low 66
2560x1440 Medium 54
2560x1440 High 40
2560x1440 Ultra 40
1920x1080 Low 84
1920x1080 Medium 66
1920x1080 High 49
1920x1080 Ultra 46

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, In-Depth Analysis

This combo pairs a top-tier 16-core Intel Core i7-13700K with a last-generation NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, creating a significant performance bottleneck that shapes every result in Microsoft Flight Simulator. The data shows a system where the CPU is dramatically overqualified for the GPU it is paired with, leading to frame rates that are almost entirely dictated by the graphics card’s limits. The benchmark results indicate that this pairing lands at rank 1510 out of 1795 tested combos, placing it in the lower percentile of system configurations for this specific flight simulator.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s overall rank of 1510 out of 1795 tested combinations places it firmly in the lower tier of systems for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This low standing is not due to a weak processor; the Intel Core i7-13700K is a powerhouse that sits in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs. Instead, the ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU’s performance ceiling. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, while a capable card in its day, now only ranks in the 51st percentile against all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 12331 is nearly four times lower than the CPU's average score of 47282.

The disparity between the two components is clear when examining their nearest rivals. The i7-13700K trades blows with the Intel Core i7-13700KF, AMD EPYC 4364P, and Intel Core i9-12900F, with a delta of less than 0.5% from each. This shows the CPU is operating at the very top of its class. In contrast, the GTX 1070 is statistically tied with older workstation and mobile parts like the NVIDIA Quadro K4200, GeForce GTX 880M, and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, with deltas ranging from -1.7% to 0.7%. This illustrates that the GPU is the limiting factor, holding back the entire system from achieving a higher rank.

FAQ

Q: Is this CPU too powerful for this GPU?

A: The benchmark data strongly suggests yes. The Intel Core i7-13700K scores 47282 on average, placing it in the 93rd CPU percentile, while the GTX 1070 scores 12331, placing it in the 51st GPU percentile. This massive gap indicates the CPU will spend most of its time idle, waiting on the GPU to render frames.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 83.7 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded. At 2560x1440 Low settings, it drops to 66.1 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS experience, 1440p Low is the highest resolution that achieves that target.

Q: Can this system handle 4K resolution?

A: The data shows it struggles. At 3840x2160, even on Low settings, the average frame rate is 47.2 FPS. Moving to High settings drops it to 28.7 FPS, and Ultra settings yield only 25.4 FPS. This indicates 4K gaming is not a viable option for this pairing.

Q: How does the GTX 1070 compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GTX 1070 has an average score of 12331, which is within 1.7% of the NVIDIA Quadro K4200, GeForce GTX 880M, and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. This means its performance is essentially on par with these cards in this benchmark suite.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance like?

A: The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score is 1136, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 5505. These scores are high, reflecting a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is beneficial for a game like Microsoft Flight Simulator that relies heavily on single-core performance for flight models and scenery loading.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At 1920x1080 High settings, the system produces 49.2 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 High, the frame rate drops to 40.3 FPS, a reduction of about 18%. The jump to 3840x2160 High is more punishing, falling to 28.7 FPS, which is a 42% drop from the 1080p figure. This pattern of significant performance loss as resolution increases is a textbook sign that the GTX 1070 is being overwhelmed by the pixel count.

The trend is consistent across all settings. On Low, the system goes from 83.7 FPS at 1080p to 47.2 FPS at 4K. On Medium, it falls from 66.2 FPS to 34.8 FPS. This scaling behavior confirms that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache, is not the limiting factor at higher resolutions; instead, the GTX 1070’s 256-bit memory bus and 256.3 GB/s bandwidth become the bottleneck, unable to feed the GPU enough data for the increased pixel throughput.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's capabilities. At 1920x1080, the settings scale as follows: Low averages 83.7 FPS, Medium averages 66.2 FPS, High averages 49.2 FPS, and Ultra averages 45.7 FPS. This is the only resolution where the system can consistently achieve above 60 FPS, and only on the Low preset.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably. Low settings average 66.1 FPS, which is still playable, but Medium drops to 53.8 FPS, High to 40.3 FPS, and Ultra to 40.1 FPS. The close scores between High and Ultra at this resolution suggest the GPU is hitting a hard performance ceiling that more graphics work cannot overcome.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly out of its depth. Low settings produce 47.2 FPS, Medium drops to 34.8 FPS, High to 28.7 FPS, and Ultra to 25.4 FPS. These numbers are all below the 60 FPS target and are only suitable for slow, scenic flying rather than fast-paced action. The data shows that the GTX 1070 is not capable of delivering a smooth experience at 4K for this title.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.40 GHz, which is crucial for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This game is known for its heavy single-threaded workloads, particularly for processing the complex flight dynamics and rendering the detailed world. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance is evident in its 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5505.

However, the benchmark results show that this CPU power is largely untapped in this configuration. At 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 45.7 FPS, but the GPU is likely the reason for this cap, not the CPU. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39000, are world-class, but they do not translate into higher frame rates here because the GTX 1070’s 6.463 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is simply too low to keep up. The data suggests that a user would see almost no frame rate improvement from overclocking the CPU, as the GPU is the definitive performance limiter. The CPU’s role is to feed frames to the GPU, and it is doing so without breaking a sweat.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal way to play Microsoft Flight Simulator with this hardware is to prioritize resolution and settings that keep the frame rate above 60 FPS. The only configuration that achieves this is 1920x1080 with the Low preset, which averages 83.7 FPS. This provides a smooth, fluid experience, essential for a simulator where camera panning and scenery streaming are constant.

For users with a 1440p monitor, the Low preset at 2560x1440 is the only viable option for a stable 60 FPS, averaging 66.1 FPS. Choosing Medium at this resolution drops the average to 53.8 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a smooth experience. If visual fidelity is more important than a rock-solid frame rate, 1440p Medium is the maximum acceptable setting, as High and Ultra both fall to around 40 FPS, which can feel stuttery during fast maneuvers or when flying over dense cities.

At 4K, the data recommends avoiding this resolution entirely. Even the Low preset only manages 47.2 FPS, and the visual quality at Low is significantly degraded. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 yields a mere 25.4 FPS, which is not suitable for the dynamic, continuous rendering required by a flight simulator. For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the data strongly points to 1080p or 1440p with the Low or Medium presets, as the GTX 1070 simply does not have the horsepower to drive higher settings at playable frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-13700K

Cores / Threads 16 / 24
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

VRAM 8 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1683 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 47.2
3840x2160 Medium 34.8
3840x2160 High 28.7
3840x2160 Ultra 25.4
2560x1440 Low 66.1
2560x1440 Medium 53.8
2560x1440 High 40.3
2560x1440 Ultra 40.1
1920x1080 Low 83.7
1920x1080 Medium 66.2
1920x1080 High 49.2
1920x1080 Ultra 45.7

Microsoft Flight Simulator with GTX 1070 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-13700K + GTX 1070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.