Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
132
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 132 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 75 77 109 136
1440p QHD 104 112 146 186
1080p Full HD 132 136 179 198

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 136
3840x2160 Medium 109
3840x2160 High 77
3840x2160 Ultra 75
2560x1440 Low 186
2560x1440 Medium 146
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Ultra 104
1920x1080 Low 198
1920x1080 Medium 179
1920x1080 High 136
1920x1080 Ultra 132

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers a commanding performance profile in Microsoft Flight Simulator, a title known for its punishing demands on both processor and graphics subsystems. This combination ranks 36th out of 1795 tested configurations, placing it in the top 2% of all recorded setups. The benchmark data shows that this pairing is capable of delivering a smooth and highly playable experience across all tested resolutions, though the optimal settings vary significantly depending on whether the target is maximum visual fidelity or maximum frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combination for Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination ranks 36th out of 1795 tested combos for this specific game, placing it in the 98th percentile of all tested configurations.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an average benchmark score of 31580, which is just 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-12700F's score of 31543. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX by 0.3%, and leads both the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX by 0.6%.

Q: What is the best measured frame rate for this combo at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 resolution, the highest measured average frame rate is 198.1 FPS, achieved with Low settings. The Ultra preset still delivers a very high 132 FPS average.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming with high settings?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160 resolution with High settings, the combination produces an average frame rate of 76.7 FPS. Even at the most demanding Ultra preset, it maintains an average of 75.3 FPS.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields an average of 185.8 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields 103.6 FPS. This represents a 44.2% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest visual quality settings.

Q: Does the CPU's core count and clock speed appear to bottleneck the GPU?

A: The Ryzen 7 7800X3D features 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its synthetic benchmark scores, including a multi-core score of 29149 in Cinebench R23 and a single-core score of 4115, suggest it has sufficient processing power to feed the high-end RTX 4090, as evidenced by the very high frame rates recorded across all resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this configuration at rank 36 out of 1795 tested combos for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This is an exceptional result, placing the setup firmly in the top 2% of all tested systems. The high rank is a direct consequence of the synergy between the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and the RTX 4090. The CPU's strong synthetic performance, which puts it in the 87th percentile of all processors, ensures that it can keep pace with the GPU's immense rendering capabilities.

The RTX 4090 itself is in the 91st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66473. Its nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark list, such as the NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, are within a 1.3% score difference, but these are professional-grade cards not typically used for gaming. In the context of gaming hardware, this combination is near the apex of what is achievable. The benchmark results indicate that the pairing is not leaving significant performance on the table; the measured frame rates are consistently high, suggesting a well-balanced system where neither component is acting as a major limiting factor in this particular simulator.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is built on the Zen 4 architecture and belongs to the 7000 series. It is an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. For a simulation game like Microsoft Flight Simulator, which often has significant single-threaded demands for flight model calculations and physics, the processor's 3D V-Cache technology is a critical asset. This is reflected in its strong single-core performance, scoring 4115 in Cinebench R23 and 2725 in Geekbench single-core tests.

The CPU's overall strength is evident in its multi-threaded tests as well, scoring 29149 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 34293 in Passmark multi-thread. This processing headroom is essential for handling the complex world simulation, AI traffic, and weather systems that run concurrently with the rendering thread. The data suggests that the 7800X3D is more than capable of supporting the RTX 4090. The fact that frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings, rather than being capped by CPU limitations, indicates that the processor is providing a strong enough foundation for the GPU to perform at its peak. The CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals, such as being 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-12700F, shows it is a top-tier contender for this workload.

Settings Recommendations

Analyzing the measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across the different presets. For users with a high-refresh-rate 1080p or 1440p monitor, the Low preset is the clear winner for competitive or maximum fluidity. At 1920x1080, it delivers an average of 198.1 FPS, and at 2560x1440, it maintains a robust 185.8 FPS.

However, for most players, the Medium preset offers the best balance between visual quality and performance. At 1920x1080, it achieves 178.9 FPS, which is only a 9.7% decrease from the Low preset but comes with a significant visual upgrade. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset still delivers an excellent 145.7 FPS average. Moving to High settings is also a strong option for 1440p, with an average of 111.9 FPS, which is well within the range for a smooth experience on most monitors.

For 4K gaming, the choice is more nuanced. The High preset provides a playable 76.7 FPS average, while the Ultra preset is just behind at 75.3 FPS. The Ultra preset is the best choice for visual fidelity at 4K, as the performance difference from High is minimal (a 1.8% decrease), and the frame rate remains above the standard 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset at 4K offers 136 FPS, but the visual compromise is likely too significant for a game that relies so heavily on scenery detail. The data suggests that the Ultra preset is the intended experience for this combination, as it maintains a playable frame rate at all tested resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's capabilities. At 1080p (1920x1080), the system is exceptionally fast. The Low preset leads with an average of 198.1 FPS. The Medium preset follows with 178.9 FPS, a 9.7% drop from Low. High settings reduce the average further to 135.7 FPS, and the Ultra preset delivers 132 FPS. The performance difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is only 2.7%, suggesting that the Ultra preset is a worthwhile selection given the high base frame rates.

At 1440p (2560x1440), the performance remains remarkably high. The Low preset yields an average of 185.8 FPS. The Medium preset delivers 145.7 FPS, a substantial 21.6% decrease from Low. High settings maintain a strong 111.9 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 103.6 FPS. The transition from High to Ultra here represents an 7.4% performance hit, which is a more significant cost than at 1080p, but it still results in a highly playable frame rate.

At 4K (3840x2160), the system's performance is still impressive but shows the expected scaling pressure. The Low preset delivers an average of 136 FPS, which is a 26.8% decrease from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset provides 108.8 FPS, and High settings achieve 76.7 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of 75.3 FPS. The performance gap between Medium and High at 4K is a significant 29.5%, indicating a major jump in rendering complexity. Interestingly, the difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is just 1.8%, meaning that users can enjoy the highest visual quality for nearly the same performance cost as the High preset. This makes Ultra the recommended choice for 4K users with this hardware.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4200 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 450 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 136.0
3840x2160 Medium 108.8
3840x2160 High 76.7
3840x2160 Ultra 75.3
2560x1440 Low 185.8
2560x1440 Medium 145.7
2560x1440 High 111.9
2560x1440 Ultra 103.6
1920x1080 Low 198.1
1920x1080 Medium 178.9
1920x1080 High 135.7
1920x1080 Ultra 132.0

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + RTX 4090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.