Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 112 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 48 | 64 | 73 | 103 |
| 1440p QHD | 74 | 99 | 113 | 159 |
| 1080p Full HD | 101 | 135 | 154 | 217 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB, In-Depth Analysis
# Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB delivers a playable but not exceptional experience in Lockdown Protocol, with measured frame rates ranging from 48 FPS at 4K Ultra to 217 FPS at 1080p Low. The combination sits at rank 1091 out of 2828 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database. The CPU is a top-tier performer in synthetic benchmarks, but the GPU's 29th percentile ranking among all GPUs means this pairing leans heavily on the processor to carry the load in this FPS title.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Lockdown Protocol with this combo?
A: 1920x1080 is the most reliable choice, with all four settings presets delivering above 100 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium settings clear 100 FPS, while at 3840x2160, every preset falls below 104 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?
A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160, High settings yield 64 FPS, Medium produces 73 FPS, and Low reaches 103 FPS. Ultra drops to 48 FPS, which is below the smooth gameplay threshold for a fast-paced FPS.
Q: Which settings preset gives the highest frame rate?
A: Low settings at 1920x1080 produces 217 FPS, the highest measured result across all configurations. At 2560x1440, Low yields 159 FPS, and at 3840x2160, Low achieves 103 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus scores 84,003 average on benchmarks, which is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and 1.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX. It trails the AMD EPYC 7F72 by 1.3%.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB has an average benchmark score of 4,901, which is virtually identical to the AMD FirePro W5130M at 4,904 (0.1% difference) and 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450. The AMD Radeon R7 M265 scores 0.6% higher.
Q: Is the GPU's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Lockdown Protocol?
A: The benchmark data shows playable frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings, with no VRAM-related failures or stutters reported. The 8 GB GDDR7 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth appears adequate for this title at the tested configurations.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on TSMC's 3 nm process with an Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. Its base clock runs at 3.70 GHz, boosting up to 5.80 GHz, which provides substantial single-thread headroom for Lockdown Protocol's gameplay logic. The CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB L2 per core help keep frequently accessed game data close at hand, reducing latency in combat scenarios where reaction time matters.
In synthetic workloads, this processor demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 51,731 and single-core score of 7,303 indicate a balanced design that excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 60,860 and single-thread score of 4,823 reinforce this picture. For an FPS like Lockdown Protocol, which typically relies on a few primary threads for game simulation and physics, the high single-core performance is particularly relevant.
The CPU sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 84,003. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, scores 83,807, a difference of just 0.2%. The AMD EPYC 4584PX and EPYC 9135 trail by 1.1% and 1.2% respectively, while the AMD EPYC 7F72 leads by 1.3%. These margins are small enough that in real-world gaming, the differences would be imperceptible.
The processor's memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 helps feed the GPU with game data efficiently. The 125 W TDP and unlocked multiplier make this a desktop part designed for enthusiasts who may want to push clocks further. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output, though the discrete RTX 5060 Ti handles all gaming workloads.
For Lockdown Protocol specifically, the CPU's role is to maintain consistent frame pacing and handle the game's simulation overhead. The benchmark results show that even at lower settings where the GPU has less work, frame rates scale appropriately — the 1080p Low result of 217 FPS indicates the CPU is not bottlenecking the system at high frame rates. This is a critical finding: the processor has enough headroom to support the GPU across all tested configurations without becoming the limiting factor.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a GB206 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 4,608 shading units, 144 tensor cores, and 36 RT cores, with a boost clock of 2,572 MHz. The 8 GB of GDDR7 memory runs at 28 Gbps effective across a 128-bit bus, producing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card draws 180 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W PSU.
Despite its modern architecture, the GPU's benchmark positioning is modest. It sits at the 29th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 4,901. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5130M (4,904, 0.1% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 (4,893, 0.2% behind) — both significantly older parts. This suggests that while the RTX 5060 Ti has modern features, its raw compute throughput places it in the lower tier of current GPUs.
The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,019 and PassMark G3D score of 21,981 provide additional context for gaming performance. The FP32 compute of 23.70 TFLOPS and texture rate of 370.4 GTexel/s are respectable for 1080p and 1440p gaming but constrain performance at higher resolutions.
In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU's performance scales predictably with resolution and settings. The 8 GB VRAM capacity has not shown limitations in the measured data, with the card handling Ultra settings at all three resolutions (48 FPS at 4K, 74 FPS at 1440p, 101 FPS at 1080p). The memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s appears sufficient for the game's texture streaming and geometry demands.
The GPU's dual-slot design and 241 mm length make it compatible with most mid-tower cases. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface provides ample bandwidth for this card's performance class. Given its 29th percentile standing, this GPU is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming or 1440p at medium settings, which aligns with the measured results in Lockdown Protocol.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimizing the Lockdown Protocol experience with this combo. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets deliver playable frame rates: Low at 217 FPS, Medium at 154 FPS, High at 135 FPS, and Ultra at 101 FPS. The Medium preset offers the best balance for competitive play, with average FPS well above 144 Hz refresh rates and a minimum of 131 FPS ensuring consistent responsiveness.
At 2560x1440, the options narrow. Low settings produce 159 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. Medium yields 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 FPS, still smooth for most players. High drops to 99 FPS, which is borderline for high-refresh monitors but acceptable for 60 Hz displays. Ultra falls to 74 FPS, which may feel less responsive in a fast-paced FPS.
At 3840x2160, the GPU starts to struggle. Low settings achieve 103 FPS, which is surprisingly strong and represents the best 4K option. Medium produces 73 FPS with a minimum of 62 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive scenarios. High drops to 64 FPS, and Ultra falls to 48 FPS, which is below the smoothness threshold for an FPS title.
For the best overall experience, the 1920x1080 Medium preset is recommended. It offers 154 FPS average with 131 FPS minimums, providing smooth gameplay with better visual quality than Low. The 2560x1440 Low preset is the second choice for players prioritizing resolution over visual fidelity, delivering 159 FPS. At 4K, Low settings are the only viable option for maintaining triple-digit frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB combination ranks 1091 out of 2828 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the 61st percentile of all tested combinations, meaning roughly 39% of configurations perform better in this specific game. Given that the CPU ranks in the 96th percentile and the GPU ranks in the 29th percentile, the overall combo ranking reflects the GPU's relative weakness dragging down an otherwise excellent processor.
The ranking disparity between the CPU and GPU components is notable. The processor is a top-tier part by every metric, while the GPU is positioned near entry-level territory according to benchmark scores. This imbalance manifests in the measured frame rates: the system performs well at 1080p but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K, particularly at higher settings presets.
Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing is well-suited for 1080p gaming with high refresh rates. The 217 FPS result at 1080p Low and 154 FPS at 1080p Medium place it ahead of many configurations in the database for competitive play. However, users expecting 4K Ultra performance at high frame rates will be disappointed, as the 48 FPS result at that configuration falls well short of smooth gameplay standards.
The combo's rank of 1091 out of 2828 suggests it is a mid-pack performer overall, though the context of resolution and settings matters significantly. At 1080p, this combo likely ranks much higher relative to other configurations, while at 4K Ultra, it would fall considerably lower. The data indicates this is a pairing best used with realistic expectations about its resolution and settings capabilities.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured frame rates show a clear hierarchy across settings. Ultra settings produce 48 FPS average, which is the lowest result across all tested configurations. High settings improve to 64 FPS, Medium reaches 73 FPS with a minimum of 62 FPS and maximum of 84 FPS, and Low achieves 103 FPS. The jump from Medium to Low represents a 41% increase in frame rate, making Low the only 4K preset that approaches high-refresh territory.
At 2560x1440, performance improves substantially. Low settings deliver 159 FPS, which is suitable for 144 Hz monitors. Medium produces 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 FPS and maximum of 130 FPS, maintaining smooth gameplay throughout. High settings reach 99 FPS, and Ultra drops to 74 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 85 FPS, representing a 53% performance difference between the extremes of the settings spectrum.
At 1920x1080, the data shows this combo's strongest performance. Low settings achieve 217 FPS, which is the highest measured result in the entire dataset. Medium produces 154 FPS with a minimum of 131 FPS and maximum of 178 FPS, ensuring consistent frame delivery. High settings reach 135 FPS, and Ultra achieves 101 FPS. All four settings presets exceed 100 FPS at 1080p, making this resolution the safest choice for any gameplay scenario.
The scaling between resolutions follows expected patterns. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings reduces frame rates by approximately 27% on Low (217 to 159), 27% on Medium (154 to 113), 27% on High (135 to 99), and 27% on Ultra (101 to 74). Moving from 1440p to 4K reduces frame rates further: 35% on Low (159 to 103), 35% on Medium (113 to 73), 35% on High (99 to 64), and 35% on Ultra (74 to 48). These consistent scaling patterns indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, with the CPU providing stable frame delivery throughout.
The minimum frame rate data available for Medium settings shows healthy 1% lows relative to averages: 131 FPS minimum against 154 FPS average at 1080p, 96 FPS minimum against 113 FPS average at 1440p, and 62 FPS minimum against 73 FPS average at 4K. These ratios suggest the system maintains stable frame pacing without significant drops during intense gameplay moments.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 103.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 73.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 48.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 159.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 113.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 99.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 74.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 217.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 154.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 135.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 101.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 290K Plus + RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.