Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol

AVERAGE FPS
112
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 112 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 64 73 103
1440p QHD 74 99 113 159
1080p Full HD 101 135 154 217

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 103
3840x2160 Medium 73
3840x2160 High 64
3840x2160 Ultra 48
2560x1440 Low 159
2560x1440 Medium 113
2560x1440 High 99
2560x1440 Ultra 74
1920x1080 Low 217
1920x1080 Medium 154
1920x1080 High 135
1920x1080 Ultra 101

Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB, In-Depth Analysis

Lockdown Protocol is a fast-paced FPS where frame pacing and responsiveness directly translate into competitive advantage, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB combination delivers a highly capable, if not flawless, experience across the board. The benchmark data shows this pairing is heavily skewed toward high-refresh 1080p and 1440p play, with 4K available for those who prioritize visual fidelity over raw frame rates. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data to explain exactly what this combo offers, where its bottlenecks lie, and how to configure it for the best results.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which provides substantial headroom for the single-threaded workloads that often dominate game logic in a fast-paced FPS like Lockdown Protocol. With a 65W TDP and support for DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, this CPU is positioned as a high-end enthusiast part, and its benchmark results confirm its strength in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks.

In the context of Lockdown Protocol, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls, manage game physics, and handle AI for opponents. The data from this specific combo suggests that the Core Ultra 7 265 is more than up to the task, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the limiting factor. The processor's strong single-core performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960, ensures that the game's main thread is rarely a bottleneck. Its multi-threaded capabilities, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216, also provide ample overhead for background tasks like streaming or voice chat without impacting frame rates.

The CPU's performance relative to its direct rivals is tight. The data shows it is just 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P in average benchmark score, a negligible difference. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, which is essentially a variant without integrated graphics. Given the game's reliance on frame generation and high-FPS scenarios, this CPU's ability to maintain high minimum frame rates is critical, and the measured results indicate it does so effectively. The processor ranks in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, placing it firmly in the top tier for gaming performance, which is a crucial foundation for the frame rates seen in the measured FPS data.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset to choose based on your performance priorities. At 1080p, the most common resolution for competitive FPS players, the data shows that the Low preset delivers a massive 217 FPS average. This is the optimal choice for players with high-refresh monitors (144Hz or higher) who crave the absolute smoothest experience, as it provides a significant buffer above the 144 FPS mark. The Medium preset also performs admirably at 1080p, with an average of 154 FPS and a minimum of 131 FPS, ensuring a consistent, tear-free experience on a 144Hz display. While the High preset drops to 135 FPS average, it remains playable, but the jump from Medium to High costs nearly 20 FPS, which is a significant trade-off for minor visual gains.

For those gaming at 1440p, the sweet spot is clearly the Medium preset, which yields an average of 113 FPS and a minimum of 96 FPS. This is a solid result for a 100Hz or 120Hz monitor and offers a good balance between visual quality and performance. The Low preset at 1440p reaches 159 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh 1440p panels, but it sacrifices visual fidelity. The High preset at 1440p drops to 99 FPS average, which is still smooth but falls below the 100 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for a competitive shooter. At 4K, the situation changes dramatically. The Low preset is the only truly playable option, averaging 103 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 73 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets fall to 64 FPS and 48 FPS respectively, which are not ideal for a competitive FPS.

The data indicates that the Medium preset provides the best overall experience, balancing visual fidelity with high frame rates. It offers a 154 FPS average at 1080p, a 113 FPS average at 1440p, and remains the best option for 4K users who want more than just the absolute lowest settings. While the Low preset offers the highest FPS, the jump to Medium provides a noticeable improvement in visual quality for a relatively small performance cost at 1080p and 1440p. For 4K, however, Low is the recommended preset if frame rate is the primary concern.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data reveals a clear picture of where the bottleneck lies in this system. Moving from 1080p to 1440p on the High preset, the average FPS drops from 135 to 99, a 26.7% decrease in performance. This substantial drop indicates that the system is becoming increasingly GPU-limited as the pixel count rises. The trend continues more aggressively when moving from 1440p to 4K, where the average FPS on High falls from 99 to 64, a further 35.4% decrease. This steep decline is a classic sign of a GPU that is struggling to keep up with the rendering demands of higher resolutions.

At 1080p, the CPU is doing more of the heavy lifting, and the Core Ultra 7 265's strong performance allows the GPU to work at its full potential, resulting in the high frame rates observed. As the resolution increases, the pixel fill rate and shader workload on the GPU become the dominant factor. The RTX 5060 Ti's 8 GB of VRAM and its 128-bit memory bus are put under significant strain at 4K, limiting the frame rate. The fact that the FPS drops from 217 at 1080p Low to 103 at 4K Low, a 52.5% reduction, even on the lowest settings, underscores that the GPU is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions.

This data suggests that the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is not the bottleneck. The CPU has ample headroom to support the GPU at 1080p, but as the resolution climbs, the GPU's raw throughput becomes the ceiling. The measured FPS curve is a textbook example of a GPU-bound scenario at 1440p and 4K, while 1080p is more balanced. For players who prefer 4K, the data implies that they must accept lower settings to achieve playable frame rates, as the GPU's memory bandwidth and processing power are insufficient to handle High or Ultra settings at that resolution without a significant performance hit.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the grand scheme of all tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB pairing ranks 1091st out of 2828 combos. This places it in the top 38.6% of all tested systems, which is a respectable position, though not a dominant one. This ranking is a composite of the CPU's and GPU's capabilities and how they interact within this specific game's engine.

The rank suggests that this is a mid-to-high-tier setup, capable of delivering a very good experience, but it is outclassed by combinations featuring higher-end GPUs. The CPU's high percentile ranking (93rd) is partially offset by the GPU's less impressive standing. The RTX 5060 Ti's 29th percentile ranking among all GPUs, as well as its average benchmark score, which is nearly identical to older cards like the AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450, highlights that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing. This is a crucial insight: the CPU is a high-performance component, but it is paired with a mid-range GPU that cannot fully leverage the CPU's potential in all scenarios.

The combo's ranking at 1091 indicates that while it will outperform many older or lower-tier systems, it will fall behind rigs with more powerful graphics cards, such as those with more VRAM or higher compute throughput. For a competitive FPS, this ranking is acceptable, as the frame rates achieved at 1080p and 1440p are more than sufficient for high-refresh gaming. However, users expecting top-tier 4K performance will find this combo's position in the rankings to be a fair reflection of its limitations. The data shows it is a balanced pairing for its class, but it is not a top-tier performer.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is the other half of this combo, and its specifications directly explain the performance ceilings seen in the data. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process and has a base clock of 2407 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. While the boost clock is high, the memory configuration is a potential limiting factor for Lockdown Protocol at high resolutions.

The GPU's role in this game is to handle the vast majority of the rendering workload, including geometry, textures, and post-processing effects. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with High settings, but it becomes strained at 4K, where texture detail and memory footprint increase significantly. The data supports this: the FPS drops sharply at 4K on High settings, suggesting the GPU is hitting a memory bandwidth wall. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p, but at 4K, the demand for texture data outpaces what the bus can deliver, causing the frame rate to plummet.

The GPU's performance metrics, such as its 23.70 TFLOPS FP32 compute power and 370.4 GTexel/s texture rate, are solid for a mid-range card. However, the 48 ROPs and the 128-bit memory bus are significant constraints for high-resolution rendering. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the bottleneck at 1440p and 4K, as the CPU is capable of much higher frame rates. For example, at 1080p Low, the GPU manages 217 FPS, but the CPU could likely push higher, indicating that the GPU is already near its limit. This is a classic case of a capable CPU being paired with a GPU that is sufficient for high-refresh 1080p/1440p gaming but not for 4K enthusiasts.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 144Hz 1080p monitor?

A: The Low preset provides the highest average FPS at 217, ensuring you stay well above your monitor's refresh rate. The Medium preset is also viable, with an average of 154 FPS and a minimum of 131 FPS, offering a better visual experience while still keeping you above the 144Hz target.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1440p for competitive play?

A: At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering an average of 113 FPS and a minimum of 96 FPS. This provides a smooth, responsive experience for competitive play. The Low preset offers a higher 159 FPS average but sacrifices visual clarity.

Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The Low preset at 4K achieves a 103 FPS average, which is playable. However, the Medium preset drops to 73 FPS, and the High preset falls to 64 FPS, which may not be smooth enough for fast-paced action. The Ultra preset is not recommended at 4K, as it only averages 48 FPS.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck for this combo?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance is strong, as evidenced by its high benchmark scores, but the RTX 5060 Ti's 8 GB VRAM and memory bandwidth limit performance as resolution increases. At 1080p, the system is more balanced, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is very closely matched with its nearest rivals. It is 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F. This indicates that the CPU's performance is right in line with its direct competitors.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among other tested systems for this game?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB combo ranks 1091st out of 2828 tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the upper-middle tier, indicating it is a solid performer but not a top-tier system for this specific game.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Cores / Threads 20 / 20
Base Clock 2400 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB

VRAM 8 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2572 MHz MHz
TDP 180 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB in Lockdown Protocol

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 103.0
3840x2160 Medium 73.0
3840x2160 High 64.0
3840x2160 Ultra 48.0
2560x1440 Low 159.0
2560x1440 Medium 113.0
2560x1440 High 99.0
2560x1440 Ultra 74.0
1920x1080 Low 217.0
1920x1080 Medium 154.0
1920x1080 High 135.0
1920x1080 Ultra 101.0

Lockdown Protocol with RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB + Other CPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 265 + RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.