Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS released in March 2024, tests both the CPU and GPU in ways that scale dramatically across resolution and quality. This benchmark combines an Intel Core i5-14600KF with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, a pairing that yields measured average frame rates from 331 FPS at 1080p Low to a more moderate 73 FPS at 4K Ultra. The combo ranks 241st out of 3,714 tested configurations, placing it comfortably in the upper echelon of the measurement database. The data shows a system that can handle competitive play at high refresh rates, but which also reveals clear limits when pushing 4K. The following analysis examines how the CPU and GPU contribute to the result, how the frame rates scale with resolution, and what settings make the most sense across the measured spectrum.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a Raptor Lake–Refresh part built on Intel's 10 nm process, with 14 cores and 20 threads. Its base clock is 3.50 GHz, boosting to 5.30 GHz, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus. Cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3. The CPU itself ranks at the 90th percentile of all processors. In synthetic tests, it records 32,544 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 17,085 in Geekbench multi-core, and 38,697 in Passmark multithread. Against its nearest rivals, the i5-14600KF sits in a tight cluster — it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, 0.4% above the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, 0.8% ahead of the Core Ultra 5 245, and 0.8% behind the Ryzen AI Max+ 388. These margins are small enough that real-world game performance will rarely be separable. In Lockdown Protocol, the CPU appears more than sufficient to feed the GPU at most resolutions. At 1080p Low, the measured 331 FPS is the highest figure in the dataset; this indicates that the processor is not the limiting factor at that point. The high boost clock of 5.30 GHz gives single-threaded physics and game logic plenty of headroom, and the 20 threads are likely to handle the concurrency of a crowded scene without causing drops.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture at TSMC's 5 nm node, is a massive rendering engine. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 256-bit bus, producing a memory bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. Its core is equipped with 10,240 shading units, 320 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 80 RT cores, and 320 tensor cores. The base clock is 2295 MHz, boost to 2550 MHz, and memory runs at 1438 MHz, delivering 23 Gbps effective through a 256-bit data path. The card's raw math might totals 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 and 52.22 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). Its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 16 GB of VRAM are well suited for higher resolutions and texture-heavy settings. In the Geekbench OpenAI API, the GPU hits a 219,065 OpenCL score and 260,075 in Vulkan; passmark G3D is 34,245, and its overall percentile is 86th. The card's nearest rivals include the RTX 4080 (touring behind by 0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (–1.1%), the AMD Ryzen RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (–2.7%), and Radeon 8060S (–2.8%). The significant memory bandwidth and somatic resources drive the FPS in titles that stress geometry and shading. In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU is the dominant influence at 4K, where the Ultra preset average drops to 73 FPS — a reduction from the 1080p medium figure of 235. This matches the GPU being the limiting factor under resolution climbs, while the CPU remains idle at lower pixel counts.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS across the three resolutions (1920×1080, 2560×1440, and 3840×2160) show a clear pattern. Starting at 1080p, the averages for Low, Medium, High, and Ultra are 331, 235, 205, and 154 FPS respectively. At 1440p, those figures become 243, 172, 151, and 113; at 4K, they fall to 157, 111, 97, and 73. The drops are not uniform: for the Low preset, 4K (157) is under half of the 1080p value (331); the same is true for Medium (111 vs 235) and High (97 vs 205). The Bigger gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 177 FPS (since 331 minus 154), but at 4K the distance shrinks to 84 FPS (157 minus 73). This compression of the settings spread at high resolution suggests that when the pixel count writes, the GPU becomes the singular, uniform scalar. At 1080p, the CPU and core architecture can still produce part of the frame, yielding a large delta between presets; at 4K, the GPU’s workload is so high that even lower settings cannot fully relieve it. The effect of scaling is also evident in the minimum frame times. For Medium, the recorded minimum FPS at 1080p is 200, at 1440p it is 147, and at 4K it is 95. These numbers show that the game never dips below 60 FPS at any resolution, even under the medium preset, which is a reassuring sign for users wanting a smooth experience.

How This Combo Ranks

In the combined database of 3,714 test combinations, this pairing of the Intel i5-14600KF and RTX 4080 SUPER holds rank 241. That placement means it outperforms the vast majority of all measured configs, though it is not at the absolute top; 241 slots above it exist millions. The CPU percentile of 90 and GPU percentile of 86 both indicate strong individual components. The fact that the pairing is at 241 rather than near 1 suggests that other configurations, likely with even faster models or more balanced combos, push the limits further. Among the nearest rival CPUs, the difference is a few tenths of a percent, so the 0.3% delta over the Ryzen 9 7900 yields little in terms of overall rank. Similarly, the GPU trails the reference RTX 4080 by a negligible 0.1%, meaning that swapping to the non-SUPER variant would hardly affect the game score. The overall rank is therefore driven by the GPU and CPU both being well above average, not by outlier performance. In this game, the combo is capable of very high average FPS at standard resolution, but it does not hold the singular record; the data shows that a handful of other combinations are faster, likely due to more recent architectures or higher-end parts.

Settings Recommendations

Choosing an optimal preset depends on the mathematical balance between visual quality and raw frame rate. The measured numbers give concrete guidance. At 1080p, all presets yield averages above 150 FPS, but if a user wants maximum smoothness for competitive play, the Medium setting shows an average of 235 FPS and a minimum of 200 FPS, plus it still produces notable visual improvements over Low. High at 205 (average) is only slightly behind Medium, but Medium delivers a 30 FPS lift. Ultra at 154 is still high, but the drop from Medium is 80 FPS. For 1440p displays where a 144 Hz monitor is common, the Medium setting provides an average of 172 FPS and a minimum of 147 FPS — a strong match for high refresh. High at 151 (average) is just above 144, but Medium offers a safer margin and the min is 147, which is above 144 Hz as well. Ultra at 113 (average) is below 144, so it is unlikely to satisfy a 144 Hz display without a lock.

For 4K, the question is one of target fluidity. An average of 73 FPS at Ultra might be acceptable for a 60 Hz display, but the min? Min was checked only for Medium: 95 FPS. So a Medium preset at 4K gives an average of 111 and a minimum of 95, meaning the game never falls below 60 FPS. High an average of 97 and a more variable, but still above 60. Therefore, in 4K, the Medium preset is the best compromise between fidelity and frame time. In total, the data suggests that for any resolution, the Medium setting grants near-ideal frame times across all three pixel counts, while Ultra is only recommended for users who have a lower refresh (or are not sensitive) and specifically want the highest quality at 4K. The Low preset, though fast at 1080p (331), does not give a balanced experience; it is intended for competitive users who want the highest frame ceiling.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The table below lists every measured average FPS, along with the minimum and maximum that were recorded for the Medium setting. All other presets lack a reported min/max.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 (4K) | High | 96 | – | – |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Low | 157 | – | – |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Medium | 111 | 95 | 128 |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Ultra | 73 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 (2K) | High | 151 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 (2K) | Low | 243 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 (2K) | Medium | 172 | 147 | 198 |

| 2560x1440 (2K) | Ultra | 113 | –| – |

| 1920x1080 (Full HD) | High | 205 | – | – |

| 1920x1080 (Full HD) | Low | 331 | – | – |

| 1920x1080 (Full HD) | Medium | 235 | 200 | 270 |

| 1920x1080 (Full HD) | Ultra | 154 | – | – |

The Min FPS column shows that at Medium, the lower bound is always above 95 FPS, so even a dramatic scene with lots of action maintains a smooth experience. The difference between the 1080p averages (331 vs 154) shows how much a quality preset can shape a GPU's load. At 4K, the gap shrinks to 73 vs 157. The High and Ultra presets at the same resolution differ by a noticeable margin (97 vs 73) likely due to extra effects that hammer the 16 GB VRAM and bandwidth. The frame data paints a consistent picture: the combo delivers around 100 FPS at 4K on High settings, but it is best to do the Medium preset to ensure a constant above 60 FPS without sacrificing much image fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the fastest preset at 1080p?

A: According to the measurements, the Low preset gives the highest average FPS at 331. The second fastest is Medium at 235, then High at 205, and Ultra at 154.

Q: At 4K, which preset yields the best average FPS?

A: The Low preset the highest at 157, followed by Medium (111), High (97), and Ultra (73). However, for most users, the Medium preset offers a balanced experience with a confident average of 111.

Q: What are the lowest recorded minimum FPS numbers for any resolution?

A: The only available Min FPS values are from the Medium preset: 200 at 1080p, 147 at 1440p, and just 95 at 4K. These confirm that the game always stays above 60 FPS at Medium on all tested resolutions.

Q: How does the CPU i5-14600KF compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU beats the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 by 0.3% in averaged benchmark scores, and is 0.4% ahead of the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. However, it is 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388. The differences are minimal.

Q: How does the GPU RTX 4080 SUIT compare to the baseline RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER's average benchmark is 54,209, and it trails the RTX 4080 (which has 52,247) by 0.1%. It is also behind the AMD Radeon Pro W2800 by 1.1% and the RX 5600 XT (the GPU list has no competitor). So the SUPER is essentially a fraction slower than the non-S series.

Q: Does the combo rank indicate that it is among the best in the database?

A: The rank of 241 out of 3,716 means it outperforms about 93.5% of tested configurations. It is high but not the absolute; there are 240 other combinations that score higher. Both the CPU and GPU have percentiles of 90 and 86, showing that no single part is a weak link