Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 90 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 51 | 59 | 83 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 80 | 91 | 128 |
| 1080p Full HD | 81 | 109 | 124 | 175 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis
# Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 9060
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a playable but uneven experience in Lockdown Protocol, with the combination ranking in the 58th percentile of tested combos (rank 1647 out of 2828). The data shows a system that excels at 1080p and remains workable at 1440p, but struggles to maintain fluid frame rates at 4K, particularly when settings are pushed beyond Medium. This analysis breaks down the measured performance across resolutions and presets, identifies where the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and contextualizes the results against the component's broader benchmark profiles.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance drop as resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario at higher pixel counts. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 175 FPS average. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 128 FPS, a 27% reduction, and then 4K Low falls to 83 FPS, another 35% decline from 1440p. This scaling pattern indicates that the Radeon RX 9060's rendering throughput is the dominant factor once pixel count rises, rather than any CPU bottleneck.
The gap between resolutions widens at higher quality presets, which further confirms GPU-bound behavior. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 109 at 1080p to 80 at 1440p (a 27% drop) and then to 51 at 4K (a 36% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage declines across Low and High presets suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s) and its 8 GB VRAM capacity are being taxed similarly regardless of the visual complexity, since the resolution change alone accounts for most of the performance delta.
Interestingly, the jump from 1080p to 1440p costs less in relative terms than the jump from 1440p to 4K. For Medium settings, 1080p yields 124 FPS, 1440p yields 91 FPS (27% lower), and 4K yields 59 FPS (35% lower than 1440p). The 4K results are particularly telling: at Ultra, the average FPS collapses to 39, which is below the 50 FPS minimum recorded for 4K Medium. This indicates that 4K Ultra exceeds what the GPU can sustain, pushing the renderer into a state where frame pacing likely suffers. The data suggests that 4K is only viable at Low preset, where 83 FPS remains playable, while 1440p offers a much broader operating window across all presets.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1080p, Medium settings provide the best balance, delivering 124 FPS average with a recorded minimum of 106 FPS and maximum of 143 FPS. This preset offers a 15 FPS improvement over High (109 FPS) while retaining a smooth frame rate that exceeds most display refresh rates. Ultra at 1080p drops to 81 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 35% reduction from Medium for what is likely marginal visual gain in a fast-paced FPS title.
For 1440p, Medium again emerges as the sweet spot. The 91 FPS average with a 77 FPS minimum keeps the experience fluid, whereas High at 80 FPS may dip into less comfortable territory during intense scenes. Ultra at 1440p falls to 60 FPS average, which is technically playable but leaves little headroom for frame time spikes. The data suggests that 1440p Ultra should be avoided if consistent performance is a priority.
At 4K, the recommendations become more restrictive. Low settings produce 83 FPS average, which is the only preset that maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Medium drops to 59 FPS average with a 50 FPS minimum, which is borderline for competitive play. High (51 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) fall below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The measured data indicates that 4K should be reserved for Low or possibly Medium if the user tolerates occasional dips, while 1080p and 1440p users can comfortably run Medium or High without sacrificing frame rates.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The measured data shows 1080p as the strongest resolution, with 175 FPS at Low and 124 FPS at Medium. 1440p remains viable with 128 FPS at Low and 91 FPS at Medium, but 4K performance drops significantly, with only Low (83 FPS) exceeding 60 FPS average.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?
A: The average FPS at 4K Ultra is 39, which is the lowest measured value across all tested configurations. This falls well below the 50 FPS minimum seen at 4K Medium, indicating the GPU cannot sustain playable frame rates at this preset.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The resolution scaling data points to the GPU as the primary constraint. Performance drops by roughly 27-36% when moving from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K, which is consistent with GPU-bound rendering. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D's strong multi-threaded scores (16817 in Cinebench R23 multicore) suggest it is not the bottleneck.
Q: What preset should I use for 1440p gaming?
A: Medium settings provide the best measured experience at 1440p, with a 91 FPS average and 77 FPS minimum. High is also acceptable at 80 FPS, but Ultra drops to 60 FPS average, which offers less headroom for demanding scenes.
Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM affect performance at higher resolutions?
A: The measured frame rates show a steep decline at 4K, particularly at High (51 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS), which is consistent with the 8 GB memory capacity being exceeded at higher pixel counts. The GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth also appears insufficient for 4K Ultra workloads.
Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 1647 out of 2828 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the lower-middle tier. This ranking reflects the GPU's mid-range standing (59th percentile among all GPUs) rather than the CPU's stronger position (83rd percentile among all CPUs).
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Radeon RX 9060 ranks 1647 out of 2828 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the 58th percentile of all configurations. This ranking is notably lower than what the CPU's individual benchmark standing would suggest, as the Ryzen 7 7800X3D sits in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 33079. The GPU, in contrast, holds the 59th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 16014, which more closely aligns with the combo's overall position.
The disconnect between CPU and GPU standings indicates that Lockdown Protocol is heavily GPU-dependent in this configuration. The ranking data shows the combo sits near the middle of the pack, suggesting that many other GPU pairings with this CPU would achieve higher frame rates. The measured FPS at 1080p Medium (124 FPS) is respectable, but the 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS drags down the overall perception of the combo's capability. For users prioritizing high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming, this rank is acceptable; for those expecting 4K capability, the data suggests looking elsewhere.
The nearest rival comparisons for the GPU show the RX 9060 performing within a narrow band of comparable products. It sits within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (avg score 16129) and within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (avg score 15852). This tight clustering indicates that the RX 9060 is not an outlier in either direction; its gaming performance in Lockdown Protocol aligns with its synthetic benchmark position. The CPU's nearest rivals are similarly close, with the Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i7-13650HX both matching the 7800X3D's average score of 33089 with 0% delta.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). These specifications position the card as a mid-range offering, which is reflected in its 59th percentile standing among all GPUs.
The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and the measured FPS data shows this configuration becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The transition from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings results in a 35% frame rate reduction (91 to 59 FPS), while the jump from 1080p to 1440p costs only 27% (124 to 91 FPS). This nonlinear scaling suggests that the memory subsystem and pixel fill rate (191.4 GPixel/s) are insufficient for the higher pixel counts. The texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s and FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS provide adequate performance at lower resolutions but cannot compensate for the bandwidth constraint at 4K.
The GPU's benchmark profile reinforces its mid-range positioning. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 and Passmark G3D score of 17631 place it in a competitive but not elite tier. The nearest rival comparisons show the RX 9060 within 1% of the RX 7700 and R9 370X, and within 2.1% of the Radeon Pro W5500. In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU's role is decisive: it determines whether the combo achieves playable frame rates at higher resolutions, and the data clearly shows that 4K Ultra (39 FPS) and 4K High (51 FPS) are beyond its capabilities, while 1080p and 1440p remain strong.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance across all presets. Low settings produce 175 FPS average, Medium yields 124 FPS with a 106 FPS minimum and 143 FPS maximum, High achieves 109 FPS, and Ultra drops to 81 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra (175 to 81 FPS) represents a 54% reduction, demonstrating that the GPU can handle 1080p even at the highest settings, though the gap between Medium and Ultra (124 to 81 FPS) suggests diminishing returns for the visual upgrade.
At 2560x1440, performance remains solid but shows clear scaling pressure. Low settings maintain 128 FPS, Medium produces 91 FPS with a 77 FPS minimum and 105 FPS maximum, High reaches 80 FPS, and Ultra falls to 60 FPS. The 1440p results mirror the 1080p pattern but at consistently lower absolute values, with Ultra at 60 FPS sitting right at the edge of comfortable playability. The Medium preset's 77 FPS minimum indicates that even the recommended setting can experience dips during heavy scenes.
At 3840x2160, the combo's limitations become apparent. Low settings yield 83 FPS, which is the only preset that maintains a comfortable average. Medium produces 59 FPS with a 50 FPS minimum and 68 FPS maximum, High falls to 51 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 39 FPS. The 4K data shows a clear ceiling: the GPU cannot sustain 60 FPS at any preset above Low, and the gap between Medium (59 FPS) and High (51 FPS) is relatively small, suggesting that the rendering pipeline is saturated regardless of moderate quality adjustments.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename), manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 120 W TDP. The CPU features a substantial 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is a key characteristic of the X3D series and contributes to its strong gaming performance. Memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, along with ECC support.
In synthetic benchmarks, the 7800X3D demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16817 and a Geekbench multicore score of 15610. Its single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 singlecore at 1713 and Geekbench singlecore at 2426. The 3DMark results show scaling from 959 (single-thread) to 7980 (16-thread), indicating efficient utilization of all cores. The CPU's 83rd percentile standing among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33079, places it well above the GPU's relative position.
However, the measured FPS data in Lockdown Protocol suggests that the CPU is not the performance limiter in this pairing. The resolution scaling patterns—consistent percentage drops from 1080p to 1440p to 4K—are classic signs of GPU-bound rendering. If the CPU were the constraint, frame rates would show less variation across resolutions, particularly at lower settings where the GPU has less work to do. The fact that 1080p Low reaches 175 FPS while 4K Low drops to 83 FPS indicates the GPU's rendering throughput is the determining factor. The CPU's nearest rivals (Ryzen 7 8700G, Intel Core i7-13650HX, Ryzen 7 7745HX) all have nearly identical average scores, confirming that the 7800X3D provides consistent, high-level processing power that exceeds what this game demands at the tested settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Radeon RX 9060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 83.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 59.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 39.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 128.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 91.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 80.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 60.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 175.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 124.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 109.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 81.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RX 9060 + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + RX 9060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.