Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol is a demanding FPS, and this pairing of an AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti produces a wide range of frame rates depending on how you configure it. The data shows a system that is capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1080p but quickly becomes bound by the graphics card as resolution increases. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to help you find the right balance.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and clearly identifies the GTX 1080 Ti as the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 112.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 84.2 FPS at 2560x1440, a 25% reduction. Moving to 3840x2160, the average drops further to 55.2 FPS, which is a 51% decrease from the 1080p result. This pattern is consistent across all settings presets, indicating a classic GPU-bound scenario at higher pixel counts.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly punishing. At Low settings, the 132.3 FPS at 2560x1440 falls to 84.3 FPS at 4K, a 36% loss. Even at Ultra settings, where the frame rates are already low, the drop from 60.8 FPS at 1440p to 38.1 FPS at 4K represents a 37% reduction. This confirms that the 11 GB of GDDR5X memory and the 484.4 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain the pixel throughput required for 4K, and the 3584 shading units are simply overwhelmed by the workload.

The data suggests that the Ryzen 7 5700G, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is not the bottleneck at any resolution. The frame rate deltas between resolutions are much larger than the differences between CPU-bound scenarios. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates at 1080p would be much closer to those at 1440p. Because the 1080p results are significantly higher, it proves the CPU has ample headroom. The GPU is the component that dictates the performance ceiling, especially when you push past 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database for Lockdown Protocol, this combination of CPU and GPU ranks 984 out of 1637 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 40% of all configurations, which is a direct result of the GTX 1080 Ti's age. The GPU's percentile ranking of 61 against all other GPUs is decent, but the combo's overall rank is dragged down by the fact that many modern systems pair newer cards with faster processors.

Looking at the GPU's nearest rivals, the GTX 1080 Ti scores an average of 19402, which is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 (19405, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (19426, -0.1% delta). It is 1.1% faster than the NVIDIA TITAN Xp (19184) but 0.6% slower than the NVIDIA Tesla K40m (19519). These figures show that while the 1080 Ti is not a top-tier performer in 2024, it still holds its own against a specific set of older and professional-grade cards.

The CPU side tells a similar story of a mid-pack performer. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G has an average benchmark score of 25626, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest competitors are the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (25706, -0.3% delta), the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25532, 0.4% delta), and the Intel Core 5 210H (25490, 0.5% delta). This means the processor's compute capability is solid, but it is not a standout part that would boost the combo's rank. The rank of 984 primarily reflects the GPU's limitation in this specific game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a Zen 3 architecture part on the AM4 socket, built on TSMC's 7 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This configuration provides strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20755 and its Passmark multithread score of 24419. For a game like Lockdown Protocol, this core count and clock speed are more than sufficient to feed the GTX 1080 Ti.

The CPU's single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2930 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 899. These figures indicate that it can handle the game's primary game logic and render thread without becoming a bottleneck. The measured FPS data supports this, as the system is able to achieve 179.3 FPS at 1080p Low settings. This high frame rate is a clear sign that the CPU is not holding the system back, as it can process the game state quickly enough to allow the GPU to push out a high number of frames.

The L3 cache is 16 MB, which is standard for the 5000 series. While not as large as some newer chips, it is sufficient for gaming workloads. The memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s with dual-channel DDR4 support is another factor that keeps the CPU from being a limiting factor. In this combo, the CPU's role is to provide a stable foundation, and it does so without any signs of struggle in the measured data. The performance ceiling is entirely defined by the GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system is clearly capable of high-refresh-rate gaming. With Low settings, it averages 179.3 FPS. Medium settings yield 129.1 FPS, and High settings produce 112.4 FPS. Even at Ultra settings, the average remains playable at 85.7 FPS. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for this hardware, allowing you to prioritize frame rate or visual fidelity depending on your preference.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops, but the results are still mostly playable. Low settings average 132.3 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. Medium settings average 96.3 FPS, and High settings average 84.2 FPS. The Ultra preset brings the average down to 60.8 FPS, which is the minimum for a smooth experience on a standard 60 Hz monitor. The data shows that 1440p is viable if you are willing to adjust the quality settings.

Stepping up to 3840x2160 reveals the GPU's limits. The highest average frame rate at 4K is 84.3 FPS on Low settings. This is a significant drop from the 132.3 FPS at 1440p Low. Medium settings average 60.8 FPS, High settings drop to 55.2 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to a barely playable 38.1 FPS. At this resolution, the GTX 1080 Ti is clearly overburdened. The 4K results are only suitable for slower-paced games or if you can tolerate lower frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo handle 1080p gaming at high refresh rates?

A: Yes, the data confirms it. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average FPS is 112.4, and at Low settings it reaches 179.3 FPS. This indicates the system can easily drive a 144 Hz monitor at 1080p.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700G a bottleneck for the GTX 1080 Ti in this game?

A: No, the data does not suggest a CPU bottleneck. The frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings, which is typical of a GPU-limited workload. The high scores at 1080p, such as 179.3 FPS on Low, show the CPU is not holding the GPU back.

Q: What is the best resolution for a smooth experience?

A: For a consistent 60+ FPS experience, 1080p is the safest choice, with all presets averaging above 85 FPS. At 1440p, you can achieve 60+ FPS on Low, Medium, and High settings. 4K is not recommended for smooth gameplay, as only the Low preset averages above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the GTX 1080 Ti compare to its nearest rivals?

A: In terms of average benchmark score, it is essentially tied with the GTX 780 (0% delta) and the Radeon Pro 560X (-0.1% delta). It is 1.1% faster than the TITAN Xp but 0.6% slower than the Tesla K40m. Its performance is consistent with that group.

Q: Is the CPU's multi-threaded performance strong for gaming?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 5700G has a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20755 and a 3DMark 16-thread score of 6629. This 8-core, 16-thread processor provides ample processing power for modern game engines, ensuring it can keep up with the GPU's demands.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings average 132.3 FPS, while Ultra settings average 60.8 FPS. This is a 54% reduction in frame rate, showing the significant impact of the Ultra preset on the GPU.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the best experience depends on your target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p, the High preset is the recommended starting point. It delivers 112.4 FPS, which is a great balance between visual quality and performance. If you have a 144 Hz monitor and want to maximize smoothness, the Low preset at 179.3 FPS is the best choice. The Medium preset at 129.1 FPS is also an excellent option if you want a slight visual upgrade without sacrificing too much speed.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the most practical choice. It averages 96.3 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and provides good visual detail. The High preset at 84.2 FPS is also viable if you prefer higher quality settings. The Ultra preset at 60.8 FPS is playable but sits right at the edge of what is considered smooth. For a more competitive edge, the Low preset's 132.3 FPS is the clear winner if you want the highest frame rate possible.

For 4K, the data suggests that this combo is not well-suited for the task. The Low preset at 84.3 FPS is the only one that provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 60.8 FPS is borderline, and the High and Ultra presets at 55.2 and 38.1 FPS respectively are not recommended for a smooth experience. If you are gaming at 4K, you will need to accept significant compromises in visual quality to maintain playable frame rates.