Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol with the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is a balanced pairing that delivers strong frame rates across all tested resolutions. The data shows a combination that scales predictably with settings, offering a clear path to high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 4K performance. This analysis breaks down the measured results to explain where the CPU and GPU each carry the load.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. This is a modern desktop chip for the AM5 socket, supporting DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Its 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core are typical for this class.

For a fast-paced FPS like Lockdown Protocol, the CPU's single-thread performance often dictates the ceiling for high frame rates, especially at lower resolutions. The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 951 in the 3dmark_single_thread test and 2943 in cinebench_r23_singlecore. These are respectable figures that suggest the processor can handle the game's physics and game logic without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The 12 threads provide enough headroom for background tasks and the game's multi-threaded aspects.

The processor's overall standing is solid. It holds a percentile rank of 77 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, Intel Core i7-11850H, Intel Core i7-13620H, and AMD EPYC 9474F. The delta from these rivals is minimal, with the 8400F scoring 0.2% higher than the 7500F and 0.3% higher than the i7-11850H, while trailing the EPYC 9474F by 0.4%. This places the 8400F right in the middle of a very tight performance cluster, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios, the experience will be nearly identical to those alternatives.

The measured FPS results in Lockdown Protocol confirm that the CPU is up to the task. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 235 FPS, a frame rate that demands strong per-core performance. The fact that this number drops to 146 FPS at High settings and 109 FPS at Ultra shows that the GPU is increasingly taking over the workload as visual fidelity increases, but the CPU is clearly not limiting the combo from achieving very high frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 1235 out of 3714 combos. This places it in the top third of all tested systems, which is a strong result for a mid-range processor paired with an upper-mid-range graphics card. The percentile position indicates that a majority of tested systems will deliver lower or comparable performance, while a smaller segment of high-end pairings will outpace it.

What does this rank mean practically? It suggests that the Ryzen 5 8400F and RX 7800 XT combination is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, but it is far from a compromise. It is a config that will handle the game smoothly at the most common resolutions. The rank of 1235 out of 3714 implies that there is a significant performance gap to the very top systems, but this combo is well-positioned to provide a high-quality experience without the cost or power requirements of the absolute best hardware.

The data shows a consistent performance profile. The combo's ranking is a reflection of the balance between the CPU's 77th percentile rank and the GPU's 51st percentile rank among all parts. The CPU is a relatively stronger component than the GPU, which is an important dynamic to keep in mind for the remainder of this analysis. It means the system is more likely to be GPU-limited in most scenarios, which is generally a favorable situation for gaming.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data shows a clear and expected scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 146 FPS at 1080p to 107 FPS at 1440p, and further to 69 FPS at 4K. This represents a 27% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 53% drop from 1080p to 4K. This is a significant decline, but the frame rates remain playable at all resolutions.

The pattern at Low settings is even more revealing. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 235 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 172 FPS, and at 4K Low, it settles at 111 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 27%, which is similar to the High settings drop. However, the drop from 1080p to 4K is 53%, which is identical to the High settings drop. This consistency suggests that the scaling is primarily driven by the GPU's rendering load.

The data points strongly toward the GPU being the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU is able to feed the GPU enough data to achieve very high frame rates, but as the pixel count increases, the GPU's workload grows proportionally. The RX 7800 XT's performance declines steadily with resolution, while the CPU's capability remains constant. The fact that the percentage drop is similar across different settings presets further confirms that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K, as the CPU's workload does not change significantly with visual settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers a wide range of frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 235. Medium settings produce an average of 167 FPS, with a minimum of 142 FPS and a maximum of 192 FPS. High settings yield an average of 146 FPS, and Ultra settings bring the average down to 109 FPS. This shows that at 1080p, the system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming on all but the most demanding preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop but remain strong. Low settings average 172 FPS. Medium settings average 122 FPS, with a minimum of 104 FPS and a maximum of 141 FPS. High settings average 107 FPS, and Ultra settings average 80 FPS. At 1440p, the system still provides a smooth experience for most players, with the Medium preset offering a good balance of visual quality and performance.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits. Low settings average 111 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings average 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. High settings average 69 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to an average of 52 FPS. At 4K, the Ultra preset is the only setting that dips below the 60 FPS threshold, while High and Medium settings maintain playable frame rates. The data indicates that the RX 7800 XT has enough headroom for 4K gaming, but users will need to adjust settings to maintain a consistent frame rate.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is a substantial graphics card based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, featuring the Navi 32 chip. It comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This is a significant amount of VRAM that will easily handle Lockdown Protocol's textures and assets at any resolution, ensuring no memory-related stuttering or texture pop-in. The GPU's clock speeds are listed with a base of 1295 MHz, a game clock of 2124 MHz, and a boost clock of 2430 MHz.

The GPU's raw compute power is substantial, with 3840 shading units and a FP32 performance of 37.32 TFLOPS. Its 96 ROPs and 240 TMUs are well-suited for a fast-paced FPS game that relies on high fill rates and texture throughput. The card also features 60 RT cores, which are not directly relevant to the measured non-ray-traced results but are present for future titles. The card is rated for a 263W TDP and requires a 600W PSU, which is a standard requirement for this performance class.

The GPU's benchmark scores are notable. It scores 24176 in passmark_g3d and 4157 in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12. However, its percentile rank among all GPUs is 51, with an average benchmark score of 11627. This is a lower percentile than the CPU's 77, which reinforces the point that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, which is 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT, which is 1.8% behind. This is a strange grouping, as the GTX 1660 is an older, less powerful card, but the data shows they have similar average scores.

In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU's role is to render the game's environments and effects. The 16 GB VRAM ensures that even at 4K with Ultra settings, the memory buffer is sufficient. The performance scaling we see from 1080p to 4K is directly attributable to the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth capabilities. The card is clearly strong enough for high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gaming, and it can manage 4K with some settings adjustments.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. The data provides a clear guide for making the right choice.

For 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 235 FPS, which is ideal for a 240Hz monitor. However, if the monitor is 144Hz or 165Hz, the High preset at 146 FPS is the better choice, as it offers a significant visual upgrade while still exceeding the refresh rate. The Ultra preset at 109 FPS is also viable for a 120Hz display, but the jump from High to Ultra is not worth the 25% performance loss for most players.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 107 FPS is the sweet spot. It provides a smooth experience on a 144Hz monitor, though it won't fully saturate the refresh rate. For those with a 120Hz display, the High preset is perfect. The Medium preset at 122 FPS offers a slight frame rate advantage but with lower visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 80 FPS is playable but feels less responsive, making High the recommended choice for balanced performance.

At 3840x2160, the priorities shift. The Medium preset at 79 FPS is the best overall experience, as it maintains a frame rate above 60 FPS and looks significantly better than Low. The High preset at 69 FPS is also viable for those who prioritize visual quality and are comfortable with frame rates in the high 60s. The Ultra preset at 52 FPS should be avoided for competitive play, as it drops below the 60 FPS smoothness threshold. The Low preset at 111 FPS is an option for players who demand high frame rates even at 4K, but the visual compromise is substantial.

In summary, the data suggests that the best experience is achieved by running High settings at 1080p and 1440p, and Medium settings at 4K. This provides the best balance of visual quality and frame rate stability across all resolutions. The combo is versatile, but its performance ceiling is defined by the GPU, so adjusting settings is the most effective way to tailor the experience to your display's capabilities.