Inside

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a highly capable experience in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that is far more demanding at 4K than its minimalist art style suggests. The measured frame rates show this combo can push well past 144 FPS at 1080p and remains comfortably playable at 4K Ultra, with the GPU acting as the primary performance limiter in most scenarios. Data from the FACT PACK indicates this pairing ranks 1615 out of 2887 tested combos for this game, placing it in the upper half of all systems evaluated. The following analysis breaks down how each component contributes to the observed results, what settings to use, and how this specific combination compares to other hardware pairings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, built on Intel's Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node. Its base clock runs at 2.50 GHz, boosting up to 4.40 GHz under load, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, though the measured FPS data does not specify which memory type was used in testing. Cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 18 MB of last-level cache.

Benchmark scores for this CPU place it at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19039. Its nearest competitors include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (average score 19047, 0% delta), Intel Core 3 201E (19056, -0.1% delta), Intel Core i5-1335U (18982, 0.3% delta), and AMD EPYC 7773X (18979, 0.3% delta). These results show the i5-12400F sits right at the edge of its performance class, with no meaningful gap to its closest rivals.

In Inside, the CPU's role is secondary to the GPU, given the game's relatively modest thread utilization. Single-thread performance is strong—Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1680, Geekbench single-core of 1964—which matters for the game's physics and logic updates that run on a single primary thread. The 3DMark single-thread score of 909 and 2-thread score of 1699 indicate that even lightly threaded workloads run efficiently. Multi-threaded scores are also respectable: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 12380, 3DMark 16-thread of 5895, and 3DMark max-threads of 5912. PassMark multi-thread score of 19433 further confirms the CPU handles concurrent tasks well, though Inside rarely stresses all 12 threads simultaneously.

The 4.40 GHz boost clock is the most relevant spec for this game. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 309 FPS average, which indicates the CPU is feeding frames quickly enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 66 FPS, but that is primarily a GPU limitation—the RX 9060's pixel throughput is the constraint at that resolution. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly a quarter of the CPUs in the database, and its proximity to the Ryzen 5 7535HS (0% delta) suggests users would see nearly identical frame rates with either processor in this title.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a RDNA 4.0 architecture GPU based on the Navi 44 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. Core clocks are 1700 MHz base, 2400 MHz game clock, and 2990 MHz boost. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 21.43 TFLOPS.

The GPU's benchmark performance places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs tracked, with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (average score 16129, -0.7% delta), AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, 1% delta), AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852, 1% delta), and AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679, 2.1% delta). The RX 9060 sits essentially at parity with the RTX 3060 Ti, trailing by only 0.7%, which is within normal run-to-run variance.

For Inside, the RX 9060's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient—the game's textures and effects are modest by modern standards, and the measured frame rates show no signs of memory-related stuttering. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is also adequate; even at 4K, the data throughput requirements of this puzzle platformer do not exceed what this bus can deliver. The 2990 MHz boost clock provides the raw compute headroom needed for the game's lighting and shadow effects, which are relatively simple but still benefit from higher clock speeds.

The GPU's performance scaling across resolutions is illustrative. At 1080p High, the combo hits 155 FPS average, dropping to 111 FPS at 1440p High, and further to 70 FPS at 4K High. This scaling pattern—roughly 40% drop from 1080p to 1440p, then another 37% from 1440p to 4K—is typical for a GPU with this level of pixel throughput. The RX 9060's 64 ROPs and 191.4 GPixel/s fill rate are the limiting factors at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the 66 FPS average indicates the GPU is working near its maximum capacity.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Inside at 4K with high settings?*

A: Yes. The measured data shows 70 FPS average at 3840x2160 with High settings. This is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, though it does not reach the 144 FPS that higher refresh rate displays would benefit from.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo if I want the highest frame rates?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 309 FPS average. Even at 1080p Ultra, it maintains 147 FPS average. For 1440p, Low settings produce 222 FPS average, while Ultra stays at 106 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in this game?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's 16129. In practical terms, the two GPUs perform nearly identically, and frame rate differences in Inside would be within a few FPS at any given resolution and settings combination.

*Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM enough for Inside at 4K?*

A: Yes. The game's visuals are stylized and low-detail, so 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is more than sufficient. The measured FPS data shows no frame rate anomalies that would indicate VRAM capacity issues at any resolution up to 4K Ultra.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to other processors?

A: The Core i5-12400F ranks at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. This means it outperforms approximately 73% of tracked processors, placing it in the upper mid-range of desktop CPUs.

Q: Does the combo rank well among all tested systems for this game?

A: The combo ranks 1615 out of 2887 tested combinations, placing it in the 56th percentile of all systems tested in Inside. This is a solid mid-pack result, reflecting that the GPU, while capable, is not a top-tier performer.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data for this combo provides clear guidance on which settings preset to use at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset yields 66 FPS average, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The High preset at 4K produces 70 FPS average, only 4 FPS higher than Ultra, suggesting the difference between these two presets is minimal in this game. The Medium preset at 4K jumps to 112 FPS average (with a minimum of 95 FPS and maximum of 128 FPS), which is a substantial improvement while still maintaining visual quality that suits the game's art style. For 4K users, Medium is the optimal choice—it provides a 60% frame rate increase over Ultra while the visual downgrade in a monochrome puzzle platformer is barely perceptible.

At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 111 FPS average, which is smooth on most monitors. Ultra sits at 106 FPS, only slightly lower. Medium reaches 178 FPS average (minimum 151, maximum 204), which is ideal for 144 Hz displays. For 1440p, the Medium preset is recommended because it offers the best balance between visual fidelity and the high frame rates that the game's fast-paced puzzle mechanics benefit from. Low at 1440p produces 222 FPS, but the visual reduction is unnecessary given that Medium already exceeds 144 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the situation differs. Ultra produces 147 FPS average, which is above the 144 Hz refresh rate threshold most competitive players target. High reaches 155 FPS, while Medium hits 247 FPS average (minimum 210, maximum 284). Low scales to 309 FPS. For 1080p, the Ultra preset is the best choice—it delivers frame rates high enough for any standard monitor, and the game's simple visuals mean that Ultra settings do not introduce any noticeable input lag or stutter.

The general recommendation is to prioritize Medium settings for 4K and 1440p, and Ultra for 1080p. The gap between Medium and Ultra at higher resolutions is significant (46 FPS difference at 4K, 72 FPS at 1440p), while the visual differences in Inside are subtle due to its flat-shaded, silhouette-heavy presentation. Players seeking the absolute smoothest experience should use Low settings at any resolution, but the data indicates that Medium provides a superior experience without the visual compromises of Low.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 1615 out of 2887 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the 56th percentile of all systems evaluated. This ranking reflects the GPU's mid-tier status—the CPU is strong (73rd percentile) but the GPU only reaches the 59th percentile, and the overall combo ranking is pulled down by the GPU's relative performance.

The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, has a 0.7% higher average benchmark score. In Inside, this translates to roughly 1-2 FPS difference at any given settings level, which is imperceptible in real gameplay. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 1% lower than the RX 9060, placing the two cards essentially on equal footing. The RX 9060's position relative to these rivals means that the combo's ranking would shift only slightly if paired with a different mid-range GPU.

The CPU's nearest rivals also show minimal performance deltas. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS matches the i5-12400F exactly (0% delta), while the Intel Core 3 201E is 0.1% lower and the Intel Core i5-1335U is 0.3% higher. These differences are negligible for gaming, meaning the combo's ranking is primarily determined by the GPU choice.

Within the context of Inside, this combo's 56th percentile ranking indicates it sits above average among all tested systems. The game is not particularly demanding—it runs at 66 FPS on 4K Ultra—so even mid-range hardware can achieve high frame rates. The ranking would be higher if the GPU were a tier above, but as configured, this combo delivers a smooth experience across all resolutions and settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The FACT PACK provides measured average FPS for twelve distinct configurations, spanning three resolutions and four settings presets. Data for minimum and maximum FPS is only available for the Medium preset at each resolution.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 140 FPS average
• Medium: 112 FPS average (minimum 95, maximum 128)
• High: 70 FPS average
• Ultra: 66 FPS average

At 4K, the scaling from Low to Medium is a 20% drop (28 FPS), while the jump from Medium to High is a 37.5% drop (42 FPS). High to Ultra is only a 5.7% drop (4 FPS), indicating that the High and Ultra presets have similar GPU requirements. The Medium preset's minimum of 95 FPS ensures it stays above 90 FPS even in demanding scenes, making it the safest choice for consistent 4K gameplay.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 222 FPS average
• Medium: 178 FPS average (minimum 151, maximum 204)
• High: 111 FPS average
• Ultra: 106 FPS average

At 1440p, the pattern is similar to 4K but with higher absolute values. Low to Medium drops by 19.8% (44 FPS), Medium to High drops by 37.6% (67 FPS), and High to Ultra drops by 4.5% (5 FPS). The Medium preset's minimum of 151 FPS ensures it never dips below 144 FPS, making it the ideal choice for 144 Hz monitors. Low at 222 FPS is overkill unless chasing maximum input response.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 309 FPS average
• Medium: 247 FPS average (minimum 210, maximum 284)
• High: 155 FPS average
• Ultra: 147 FPS average

At 1080p, the CPU becomes more relevant. The jump from Low to Medium drops 20.1% (62 FPS), Medium to High drops 37.2% (92 FPS), and High to Ultra drops 5.2% (8 FPS). The Ultra preset's 147 FPS average is just above the 144 Hz threshold, while Medium's 247 FPS provides ample headroom for high refresh rate displays. Low at 309 FPS is the maximum this combo can produce, limited by the CPU's single-thread performance.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset consistently offers the best frame rate-to-visual quality ratio, with minimum FPS values (95 at 4K, 151 at 1440p, 210 at 1080p) that never cause perceptible stutter. The High and Ultra presets are nearly identical in performance, differing by only 4-8 FPS, which suggests the Ultra preset's additional effects are not significantly more demanding. For players with 60 Hz displays, even 4K Ultra (66 FPS) is acceptable, but for higher refresh rate monitors, Medium at 1440p or 1080p is the data-driven choice.