Inside

Inside

AVERAGE FPS
190
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 190 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 85 90 143 179
1440p QHD 136 143 228 284
1080p Full HD 189 198 293 317

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 179
3840x2160 Medium 143
3840x2160 High 90
3840x2160 Ultra 85
2560x1440 Low 284
2560x1440 Medium 228
2560x1440 High 143
2560x1440 Ultra 136
1920x1080 Low 317
1920x1080 Medium 293
1920x1080 High 198
1920x1080 Ultra 189

Inside with AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination produces a compelling dataset for Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer, with measured frame rates that range from a staggering 317 FPS at 1080p Low to a still-smooth 85 FPS at 4K Ultra. This pairing of a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 3 processor with an 8 GB Ampere graphics card demonstrates that even older, less demanding titles can reveal distinct performance bottlenecks, and the data suggests that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution increases.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for this combo shows a dramatic and consistent decline as resolution scales from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, which is a classic indicator of the GPU becoming the limiting component. At the High settings preset, the average frame rate drops from 198 FPS at 1080p to 143 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 55 FPS, and then further down to 90 FPS at 4K, representing a total drop of 108 FPS from the 1080p baseline. This pattern of performance degradation strongly suggests that the RTX 3070 Ti's rendering throughput is the constraining factor at higher resolutions, rather than the CPU.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly telling, with the High preset losing 53 FPS (from 143 to 90), which is a 37% reduction. This steep decline is typical of a system where the graphics card's pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth are being pushed to their limits. The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU is likely doing more of the heavy lifting to maintain high frame rates, but as the pixel count increases, the GPU's workload expands exponentially, and the frame rate falls in near lockstep with that increased demand.

Interestingly, the gap between the Low and Ultra presets also widens with resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (317 FPS) and Ultra (189 FPS) is 128 FPS, but at 4K, that difference shrinks to 94 FPS (179 vs 85). This compression of the performance delta at 4K further reinforces the idea that the GPU is saturated at that resolution, as even the reduced workload of the Low preset cannot overcome the raw pixel-pushing requirements, whereas at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to exploit the lower graphical demand.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, with its 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, appears to be more than sufficient for Inside, as the frame rates at 1080p suggest the CPU is not a bottleneck. The processor's high multi-threaded capabilities, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16262 and a 3DMark max threads score of 10075, provide ample processing power for a puzzle platformer's physics and game logic, which are typically not heavily threaded. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 317 FPS, a figure that is likely near the engine's or the CPU's practical limit for frame generation.

The single-thread performance of the Ryzen 9 5900X is also robust, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3469 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2083. This strong single-core performance is crucial for games like Inside that may rely on a primary game thread for core simulation tasks. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz, up from a base of 3.70 GHz, ensures that these individual threads can run at high speeds, which helps maintain high average frame rates even when the GPU is not the limiting factor.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU's performance is in the 87th percentile compared to all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 41376 places it in close competition with rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41263, a 0.3% delta) and the Intel Core i7-14650HX (41576, a -0.5% delta). This suggests that while the 5900X is a high-end desktop part, its relative standing in synthetic benchmarks is not significantly ahead of some mobile and newer desktop chips, yet in this specific game, the measured FPS at 1080p Low (317 FPS) indicates it has the headroom to feed the GPU effectively at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the component that most directly determines the playable experience at higher resolutions, with its 8 GB of GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth proving to be a significant asset. The GPU's benchmark scores, such as a Passmark G3D score of 23356 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 139541, place it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, indicating solid mid-to-high-end performance. However, its average benchmark score of 29945 is closely matched by rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (29928, a 0.1% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30095, a -0.5% delta), showing that it sits in a competitive performance tier.

The memory configuration of 8 GB is a notable factor, especially considering the game's age and visual style. While Inside is not a VRAM-heavy title, the data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate drops to 85 FPS, which is the lowest measured value in the dataset. This suggests that the GPU's compute units, with 6144 shading units and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, are working at their maximum capacity to render the game's high-contrast, atmospheric scenes at that resolution, and the memory bandwidth is sufficient to keep up with the demand.

The GPU's role is further highlighted by the performance difference between settings at 4K. The jump from Low (179 FPS) to Medium (143 FPS) represents a 20% decrease in performance, and the further drop to High (90 FPS) is another 37% reduction. This non-linear scaling indicates that the higher settings introduce effects that are particularly taxing on the RTX 3070 Ti's architecture, likely involving more complex pixel shading and fill-rate requirements. The data implies that for a consistent 4K experience, dialing back to Medium settings is the wise choice, as it provides a 58 FPS advantage over High while still looking superior to Low.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Inside, this pairing of the Ryzen 9 5900X and RTX 3070 Ti achieves a combo rank of 1293 out of 3716 tested combos. This places the system in the upper third of all configurations tested, which is a strong showing given the game's age and the prevalence of more modern, higher-end components in the database. The rank suggests that while this combo is not at the very top of the leaderboard, it delivers a performance level that is significantly better than the majority of systems tested.

The rank of 1293 out of 3716 implies that approximately 65% of the tested combos perform worse than this specific CPU-GPU pairing. This reflects the balance of the two components; the RTX 3070 Ti is powerful enough to handle high resolutions, and the Ryzen 9 5900X is capable enough to avoid holding it back in most scenarios. The data suggests that this combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming and capable 4K gaming, which is reflected in the measured FPS figures.

When interpreting this rank, it is important to consider that the combination's placement is likely influenced by the GPU's performance ceiling in this specific title. The CPU's high percentile ranking (87th) does not translate to a similar percentile in the game's combo ranking (roughly 65th), indicating that the GPU is the more significant determinant of the final rank. This analysis is supported by the resolution scaling data, which shows the GPU becoming the bottleneck at higher settings and resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset provides a comprehensive look at the system's performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. For 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 317 FPS at Low, 293 FPS at Medium (with a minimum of 249 FPS and a maximum of 337 FPS), 198 FPS at High, and 189 FPS at Ultra. These figures demonstrate that at 1080p, the system has immense performance headroom, with even the Ultra preset providing an average frame rate that is nearly three times the refresh rate of a standard 60 Hz monitor.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates are 284 FPS at Low, 228 FPS at Medium (minimum 194 FPS, maximum 263 FPS), 143 FPS at High, and 136 FPS at Ultra. The 1440p data shows a significant drop from 1080p, particularly at the Low and Medium presets, where the frame rate falls by 33 FPS and 65 FPS, respectively. This indicates that while the CPU still has some influence, the GPU's workload is increasing, and the system is transitioning towards a more GPU-limited state.

At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 179 FPS at Low, 143 FPS at Medium (minimum 122 FPS, maximum 165 FPS), 90 FPS at High, and 85 FPS at Ultra. The 4K results show a stark contrast to 1080p, with the High preset averaging only 90 FPS and Ultra dropping to 85 FPS. The Medium preset, however, remains very playable at 143 FPS, and even Low provides a very high frame rate of 179 FPS. These numbers clearly show that the RTX 3070 Ti is the limiting factor at 4K, as the frame rates are directly tied to the graphical settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend entirely on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the data suggests that the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it provides an average of 189 FPS, which is far beyond what most displays can show, and the performance difference compared to High (198 FPS) is negligible at 9 FPS. There is no reason to sacrifice visual quality at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset is still incredibly fast.

For 2560x1440, the High preset appears to be the sweet spot, delivering an average of 143 FPS. This is a significant jump from the Ultra preset's 136 FPS, and the difference in visual quality between High and Ultra is often minimal in many games. The Medium preset offers an even higher 228 FPS, but the data implies that High provides the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, as it remains well above the 120 FPS threshold for high-refresh-rate gaming.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation. It provides an average of 143 FPS, which is a 53 FPS improvement over the High preset's 90 FPS, and a 58 FPS improvement over Ultra's 85 FPS. The Medium preset also has a minimum frame rate of 122 FPS, ensuring that there are no noticeable dips that could affect the experience. While the Low preset is even faster at 179 FPS, the visual compromises are likely too significant for a game like Inside, which relies heavily on its art style and atmosphere. The data strongly suggests that Medium is the optimal setting for 4K on this hardware.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K with a high refresh rate?*

A: Yes, at 4K with the Medium settings preset, the average frame rate is 143 FPS, with a minimum of 122 FPS. This is well above 60 FPS and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo can achieve?

A: The highest measured average frame rate is 317 FPS, which is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: At 1080p, the data suggests the CPU may be more of a factor, but as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. This is evident from the significant FPS drops when moving from 1440p to 4K.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 5900X compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900X has an average benchmark score of 41376. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, while being 0.5% behind the Intel Core i7-14650HX.

Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 143 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 136 FPS, a difference of 7 FPS in favor of High.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM on the RTX 3070 Ti cause any issues at 4K?

A: The measured data does not show any VRAM-related stuttering or crashes. The lowest average frame rate at 4K is 85 FPS on the Ultra preset, indicating the 8 GB memory is sufficient for this game's requirements at that resolution.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4800 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1770 MHz MHz
TDP 290 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Inside

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 179.0
3840x2160 Medium 143.0
3840x2160 High 90.0
3840x2160 Ultra 85.0
2560x1440 Low 284.0
2560x1440 Medium 228.0
2560x1440 High 143.0
2560x1440 Ultra 136.0
1920x1080 Low 317.0
1920x1080 Medium 293.0
1920x1080 High 198.0
1920x1080 Ultra 189.0

Inside with Ryzen 9 5900X + Other GPUs

See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Inside with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 5900X + RTX 3070 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.