Inside

Inside is a puzzle platformer released in 2016, and the measured combo here is the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX. The data is flagged as measured rather than estimated, and the average FPS rows range from 116 at 3840x2160 Ultra to 243.1 at 1920x1080 Low. Even the lowest measured result is far above typical smoothness requirements, which frames the rest of the analysis.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip. It uses a 5 nm TSMC process, contains 57,700 million transistors, and has a die size of 529 mm². Its memory configuration is 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2500 MHz, listed as 20 Gbps effective. Core clocks are 1929 MHz base, 2365 MHz game, and 2498 MHz boost. The GPU also carries 6,144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, 192 raster operations pipelines, and 96 RT cores.

These specifications are enormous for a puzzle platformer from 2016. The measured FPS reflects that. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average is still 116 FPS, and at 3840x2160 High it is 119.1 FPS. Lower presets at the same resolution produce 174.1 FPS at Medium and 185.7 FPS at Low. There is no measured row in which the GPU appears to run out of memory bandwidth or VRAM capacity. With 24 GB of GDDR6 and a 960.0 GB/s bus, the memory subsystem is far beyond anything this game can likely request, and the benchmark results confirm that the GPU is delivering high frame rates even at the highest resolution.

The GPU’s synthetic benchmarks also support the idea of a very strong part. Its average benchmark score is 44,019, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 85. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,841, and the PassMark G3D score is 31,238. In Vulkan, the Geekbench score is 192,597, while OpenCL is 189,573. These are not game-specific numbers, but they show the same pattern: the RX 7900 XTX is a high-end card on paper and in synthetic tests.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this CPU and GPU pairing in Inside is 684 out of 1,671 tested combos. That is a middle-of-the-database result for a system whose CPU and GPU each sit at the 85th percentile among all parts. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 44,019, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with a deltaPct of -0.4, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile at 0.8, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 at 1.6, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti at -2. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 28,631, with the Intel Core i5-12600 at 28,654 and a deltaPct of -0.1, the Intel Core i5-12600H at 28,666 and -0.1, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT at 28,591 and 0.1, and the AMD EPYC 7203P at 28,583 and 0.2.

The data suggests that Inside does not reward raw GPU power the way newer games might. A hardware combination that ranks at the 85th percentile in both individual component lists lands at 684 out of 1,671 combos in this specific game. That gap between component percentile and game rank is informative: it points to the game’s workload not scaling strongly with the RX 7900 XTX’s massive resources. Instead, the measured frame rates remain high across the board, which makes the rank more sensitive to how other combinations behave in the same game than to a failure of this particular pair.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data makes the resolution scaling easy to follow. At Low settings, the average at 1920x1080 is 243.1 FPS, at 2560x1440 it is 221 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it is 185.7 FPS. At Medium, the same path goes 226.4, then 203.7, then 174.1. At High, the numbers are 187.5 at 1920x1080, 166.2 at 2560x1440, and 119.1 at 3840x2160. At Ultra, they are 183 at 1920x1080, 163.2 at 2560x1440, and 116 at 3840x2160.

The pattern is consistent across every preset: moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 costs a moderate amount of average FPS, and moving to 3840x2160 costs more. The largest measured gap is at High settings, where 3840x2160 drops to 119.1 from 187.5 at 1920x1080. The smallest measured drop in absolute terms is not something this data set explicitly calculates, but the ordering shows that the High preset loses more from the resolution jump than Low or Medium does. Because the GPU has 24 GB of VRAM and a 960.0 GB/s memory bus, the resolution drop is unlikely to be a memory-capacity issue. The data indicates a rendering load issue: more pixels and higher preset quality reduce the frame rate in a steady, predictable way.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest measured row is Low at 1920x1080, with an average of 243.1 FPS. Medium at 1920x1080 is next at 226.4 FPS, and Low at 2560x1440 is 221 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank in Inside?

A: The combo rank is 684 out of 1,671 tested combos. The CPU and GPU both carry an 85th percentile rating among all CPUs and all GPUs, respectively.

Q: What are the measured FPS values at 3840x2160?

A: Low averages 185.7 FPS, Medium averages 174.1 FPS, High averages 119.1 FPS, and Ultra averages 116 FPS.

Q: Does the data include minimum or maximum frame rates?

A: No. Every measured FPS row includes only an avgFps value; the minFps and maxFps fields are null for all listed rows.

Q: What memory configuration does the RX 7900 XTX use?

A: It uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, listed as 20 Gbps effective.

Q: How close are the Ryzen 7 3700X’s nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 3700X has an average benchmark score of 28,631. The Intel Core i5-12600 is at 28,654 with a deltaPct of -0.1, the Intel Core i5-12600H is at 28,666 with -0.1, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is at 28,591 with 0.1, and the AMD EPYC 7203P is at 28,583 with 0.2.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the 3000 series. It is built on the Zen 2 architecture with the codename Matisse, uses a 7 nm TSMC process, and contains 3,800 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.60 GHz, a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and a TDP of 65 W. The cache layout is 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of L3. It supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel interface with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it connects through PCIe Gen 4 with 24 CPU lanes.

The CPU’s benchmark scores show a balanced single-thread and multi-thread profile. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 19,087 and the single-core score is 2,694. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 8,016 and the single-core score is 1,131. PassMark reports a single-thread score of 2,656 and a multithread score of 22,458. Geekbench also shows 8,083 in multi-core and 1,672 in single-core. These numbers place the processor at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within a deltaPct range of -0.1 to 0.2.

For Inside, the CPU is not the source of low frame rates. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 243.1 FPS; if the CPU were weak in this game, the average would drop noticeably at such a high frame rate. The 8-core, 16-thread design ensures plenty of throughput, while the 4.40 GHz boost clock supports the per-thread work that an older game likely needs. The data does not show any measured row where CPU-related bottlenecks push the average below 116 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows provide a direct comparison across Low, Medium, High, and Ultra at each resolution. At 1920x1080, Low is 243.1 FPS, Medium is 226.4 FPS, High is 187.5 FPS, and Ultra is 183 FPS. At 2560x1440, Low is 221 FPS, Medium is 203.7 FPS, High is 166.2 FPS, and Ultra is 163.2 FPS. At 3840x2160, Low is 185.7 FPS, Medium is 174.1 FPS, High is 119.1 FPS, and Ultra is 116 FPS.

If the goal is maximum measured frame rate, Low is the strongest preset at every resolution. If the goal is a higher image quality setting without losing too much measured FPS, Medium is the more interesting row. At all three resolutions, Medium sits much closer to Low than to High or Ultra in the measured numbers. At 3840x2160, Medium is 174.1 FPS while Low is 185.7 FPS and High is 119.1 FPS. The same shape holds at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. For a puzzle platformer, the data suggests Medium as the balanced choice, with High and Ultra reserved for users who prefer visual preset improvements and are comfortable with the lower frame rates shown in those rows.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The table below lists all measured average FPS values from the FACT PACK. The data set does not include minimum or maximum FPS values.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

| --- | --- | --- |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 243.1 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 226.4 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 187.5 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 183 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 221 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 203.7 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 166.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 163.2 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 185.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 174.1 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 119.1 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 116 |