Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combination delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a puzzle platformer from 2016. The measured frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings indicate that this pairing is vastly overqualified for the game’s demands, providing fluid gameplay even at 4K Ultra. The data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary scaling factor as resolution increases, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures high frame rates remain attainable at lower settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings for this combo?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT combo achieves an average of 193.9 FPS.

Q: How does the 4K High preset compare to the 4K Ultra preset in terms of average FPS?

A: At 3840x2160, the High preset delivers an average of 92.6 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 89.1 FPS, a difference of only 3.5 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns at the highest setting tier.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor at 1080p Low settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches 336.1 FPS. This high frame rate, coupled with the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 951 in 3dmark, indicates that the CPU is the primary limiter at this low-resolution setting, as the GPU has less work to do.

Q: What is the performance difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings produce an average of 234.5 FPS, while High settings produce 150.3 FPS. This represents a significant 84.2 FPS drop when moving from Medium to High.

*Q: How does the combo’s rank in Inside compare to all other tested combinations?*

A: The combo ranks 531 out of 1671 tested combinations, placing it in the top third of all systems tested for this game.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT?

A: The launch MSRP for the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is 499 USD.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data for Inside suggests that the Ultra preset is the optimal choice for this hardware combination, as it provides the highest visual fidelity without a major performance penalty. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset still produces an average of 193.9 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most standard monitors. Even at 4K, the Ultra preset maintains an average of 89.1 FPS, which is playable for a puzzle platformer that does not rely on twitch reflexes.

The difference between High and Ultra is minimal across all resolutions. At 1080p, the drop from High (203.5 FPS) to Ultra (193.9 FPS) is only 9.6 FPS. At 1440p, the drop is 8.3 FPS (150.3 to 142). At 4K, the drop is 3.5 FPS (92.6 to 89.1). This pattern indicates that the Ultra preset offers a negligible performance cost for its visual improvements, making it the clear recommendation for the best experience.

Lowering to Medium or Low settings yields massive frame rate increases, but this is unnecessary given the already high performance. For example, at 4K, the Medium preset delivers 148.4 FPS, but the Ultra preset’s 89.1 FPS is already sufficient. Choosing Ultra ensures the user gets the full visual experience of the game without sacrificing smoothness, making it the best-balanced preset for this combo.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K clearly identifies the GPU as the scaling component. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 203.5 at 1080p to 150.3 at 1440p, then to 92.6 at 4K. This represents a 54.5% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. The pattern is similar for other presets, with Low settings dropping from 336.1 FPS at 1080p to 185.2 FPS at 4K, a 44.9% reduction.

The relative consistency of these drops across different presets suggests that the GPU’s rendering load is the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. The CPU, with its high 3dmark single-thread score of 951, is able to feed frames fast enough, but the GPU’s pixel fill rate and compute resources become the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU’s pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s is substantial, but the sheer number of pixels at 4K (3840x2160) still presents a significant workload.

At 1080p, the gap between Low (336.1 FPS) and Ultra (193.9 FPS) is 142.2 FPS. At 4K, this gap narrows to 96.1 FPS (185.2 to 89.1). This narrowing gap indicates that at higher resolutions, the GPU is saturated, and the CPU’s ability to process the game logic becomes less relevant. The system is well-balanced for 1440p High, which delivers 150.3 FPS, but it is clearly GPU-bound at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT ranks 531 out of 1671 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the 68th percentile of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms the majority of other hardware pairings in this game. The rank reflects the high frame rates achieved, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU’s performance is leveraged.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25064 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, has an average score of 25057, a delta of 0%. This indicates that the Ryzen 5 8400F offers comparable overall processing power to a much older high-end chip. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 32619 puts it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro S9300 X2, scoring 32540, a delta of 0.2%.

The combo’s rank in Inside is likely higher than its individual component percentiles would suggest. This is because Inside is a puzzle platformer with relatively simple geometry and effects, making it less demanding on the GPU than modern 3D titles. The high CPU single-thread performance is more beneficial here, allowing the system to reach frame rates that are limited by the game engine rather than the hardware.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT plays a critical role in this combo, with its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth ensuring that texture data is readily available even at 4K. This is evidenced by the relatively small performance drop from High to Ultra at 4K (3.5 FPS), which suggests that the memory subsystem is not a bottleneck. The GPU’s boost clock of 2430 MHz and game clock of 2124 MHz provide the raw compute throughput needed to maintain high frame rates.

The GPU’s compute capabilities, measured at 37.32 TFLOPS FP32, are substantial. However, in Inside, the frame rate scaling indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The drop from 295.5 FPS at 1440p Low to 185.2 FPS at 4K Low shows that even with minimal settings, the GPU’s rendering pipeline is taxed by the 4K resolution.

The GPU’s 96 ROPs and 240 TMUs are responsible for pixel output and texture filtering. At 4K High, the 92.6 FPS average suggests these units are working efficiently. The GPU’s performance relative to its rivals is notable; it scores slightly higher than the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 (delta 0.2%) but slightly lower than the NVIDIA P104-100 (delta -0.4%). This places it in a competitive position, though the specific demands of Inside favor the high memory bandwidth and capacity of this card.