Greedfall

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination delivers a dataset that reveals a clear division of labor in Greedfall. The CPU provides a robust foundation with 20 cores and 20 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The data suggests this processor is more than sufficient for the game's demands, as the measured frame rates scale predictably with resolution changes, a hallmark of GPU-bound scenarios. The RTX 4070 Ti, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 192-bit bus, appears to be the primary driver of performance, especially at higher resolutions and settings where its 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth and 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are put to work.

The benchmark results show a system that excels at high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, while still maintaining playable frame rates at 4K. The combination's rank of 373 out of 2938 tested combos places it firmly in the upper echelon of tested configurations, yet the data also reveals interesting performance cliffs at the Ultra preset, suggesting specific bottlenecks. This analysis will break down the measured FPS across resolutions and settings, interpret the CPU and GPU roles based on their specifications and benchmark scores, and provide clear recommendations for the best gaming experience according to the measured data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. This high core count, combined with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, positions it as a top-tier desktop CPU, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. The benchmark data for this processor shows strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 points. This suggests that the CPU has ample headroom to handle not only game logic but also background tasks and streaming overlays without becoming a limiting factor.

In the context of Greedfall, an Action RPG, the CPU's role is primarily to feed the GPU with draw calls and manage game physics and AI. The data indicates that the Core Ultra 7 265 is not a bottleneck, as the frame rates at 1080p are exceptionally high. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 291 FPS. This high frame rate, even on a low preset, suggests that the CPU is capable of processing frames far faster than the GPU can render them at lower resolutions. The processor's 30 MB of shared L3 cache likely helps in keeping frequently accessed game data close to the cores, reducing latency.

Comparing the Core Ultra 7 265 to its nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database shows a tight cluster of performance. It is a mere 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P and 0.7% behind the AMD EPYC 7343 in average benchmark score. Conversely, it is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9124. This indicates that in raw computational throughput, the Core Ultra 7 265 is on par with these server-class chips, which confirms its efficiency. While these are not direct gaming competitors, the data shows that the CPU has significant compute resources that are unlikely to be fully utilized by Greedfall.

The processor's 65W TDP and 3nm process node from TSMC also contribute to its efficiency profile. The data shows a high Passmark multi-thread score of 49682, reinforcing its capability in heavily threaded workloads. However, for Greedfall, the single-threaded performance is often more critical. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960 is robust, indicating strong per-core performance that is essential for games that rely on a few primary threads. The measured FPS data supports this, as the performance scales primarily with GPU load, not CPU load, across the resolution matrix.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the clear performance driver in this combination. Its specifications are well-suited for 1440p and 4K gaming, with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is a key factor in the game's performance at higher resolutions, where larger textures and more complex scenes require substantial data throughput. The GPU's boost clock of 2610 MHz, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, allows it to achieve a pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 213808 provide context for the GPU's raw capabilities. The Passmark G3D score of 31624 further confirms its high-end status, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. In Greedfall, this translates to high frame rates even at demanding settings. The data shows that at 2560x1440 with High settings, the system averages 144 FPS, indicating that the GPU is well-utilized. The GPU's 80 ROPs are critical for the final pixel output, and the 60 RT cores, while not directly benchmarked in this game, suggest future-proofing for ray-traced titles.

The RTX 4070 Ti's performance relative to its nearest rivals is surprisingly tight. It is 0.8% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile and 1.3% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT in average benchmark score. It is also 1.6% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A6000 and 1.7% ahead of the Intel Arc A730M. This is a fascinating data point, as it shows that the 4070 Ti's desktop performance is comparable to a high-end mobile GPU and a workstation card, though these are not typical gaming comparisons. The data suggests that while the GPU is powerful, the performance headroom is not infinite, and the Ultra preset in Greedfall will push it to its limits.

The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM is a significant asset. At 4K resolution, the game's High preset averages 86 FPS, which is well within playable territory. The memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s is likely a key reason why the GPU does not suffer from severe frame rate drops at higher resolutions, as it can quickly stream textures and geometry. The 285W TDP and suggested 600W PSU indicate a power-hungry component, but the performance data justifies this power draw, as it consistently delivers high frame rates across all tested resolutions.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales with resolution. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 291 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 with Low settings, the average drops to 202 FPS, a reduction of 89 FPS or approximately 30%. Finally, at 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average falls to 120 FPS, a further drop of 82 FPS from 1440p, or about 40%. This pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound system, where frame rate is inversely proportional to the number of pixels being rendered.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings. For the High preset, the frame rates are 208 FPS at 1080p, 144 FPS at 1440p, and 86 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is about 31%, and from 1440p to 4K is about 40%. This consistent ~30% and ~40% reduction pattern strongly suggests that the GPU is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a more pronounced drop at 1080p and a plateau at higher resolutions, which is not the case here. The CPU's high single-threaded score of 5960 in Cinebench R23 supports this interpretation, as it has enough headroom to maintain these frame rates.

The data also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (291 FPS) and Ultra (133 FPS) is 158 FPS. At 1440p, the difference is 110 FPS (202 vs 92), and at 4K, the difference is 65 FPS (120 vs 55). This indicates that at lower resolutions, the GPU has spare capacity to render more complex scenes, but at 4K, it is fully saturated, and the settings have less impact on the absolute frame rate. The data implies that the RTX 4070 Ti is the primary determinant of performance, and its 12 GB VRAM buffer and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are being utilized to their fullest extent at 4K Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti ranks 373rd out of 2938 tested combos in Greedfall. This places it in the top 12.7% of all tested configurations, which is a strong showing for a desktop setup. This rank is a composite measure that considers the performance across all measured resolutions and settings. The high rank indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for this specific game, with neither component severely bottlenecking the other.

The rank of 373 is particularly interesting when considering the GPU's 84th percentile ranking. While the GPU is in the top 16% of all GPUs, the combo rank is slightly lower, suggesting that the CPU might be holding back the GPU in some scenarios, or that other combos with slightly different pairings achieve better results. However, the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's, which means the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a more exceptional component compared to its peers than the RTX 4070 Ti is. This asymmetry suggests that the GPU is the more likely limiting factor, which aligns with the resolution scaling analysis.

The data indicates that the combo is not rank 1, and there are 372 other combos that perform better. These could include systems with the RTX 4090 or other top-tier GPUs, which would have higher raw performance. The rank of 373 is not a criticism of this combo but rather a reflection of the competitive landscape. For a high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming rig, this rank is excellent. The measured FPS data shows that the combo can exceed 144 FPS at 1440p on High settings, which is a target many gamers consider the sweet spot for competitive and immersive gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. With Low settings, it averages 291 FPS. Medium settings yield an average of 229 FPS, with a minimum of 194 FPS and a maximum of 263 FPS. High settings drop the average to 208 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, still manages an average of 133 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is primarily limited by the CPU's ability to issue draw calls, as the frame rates are incredibly high even on Ultra.

At 2560x1440, the performance is still very strong. Low settings produce an average of 202 FPS. Medium settings average 159 FPS, with a minimum of 135 FPS and a maximum of 182 FPS. High settings yield 144 FPS, which is exactly at the refresh rate of many high-end monitors. Ultra settings drop to 92 FPS, which is still very smooth for a demanding title. The data shows a smooth progression, with the GPU taking on more responsibility as the pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to show the strain of 4K rendering. Low settings average 120 FPS, which is excellent. Medium settings average 95 FPS, with a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS. High settings drop to 86 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, is the outlier, with an average of only 55 FPS. This significant drop from High to Ultra at 4K (86 to 55 FPS) suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU's memory bandwidth or shading units. The 12 GB VRAM might also be nearing its capacity at 4K Ultra, causing a performance cliff.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

According to the measured data, the High preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, it provides 208 FPS, which is far beyond what any monitor can display, making it a waste of potential but proof of the system's power. At 2560x1440, the High preset hits 144 FPS, which is the gold standard for high-refresh-rate gaming, offering a perfect balance of visual fidelity and responsiveness. At 3840x2160, the High preset averages 86 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, making it the recommended choice for 4K.

The Medium preset is a viable alternative for those who want to ensure a rock-solid frame rate with no dips. At 4K, it averages 95 FPS with a minimum of 80 FPS, which is more stable than the High preset's 86 FPS average. The data shows that Medium offers a 9 FPS average increase over High at 4K, and the minimum FPS of 80 provides a better guarantee against stutters. At 1440p, the Medium preset at 159 FPS is only slightly higher than High, but the 135 FPS minimum is lower than the High preset's average, indicating it might not be as consistent. However, for 4K gaming, Medium is the safest choice for a consistent experience.

The Low preset is only recommended for competitive play at 1080p or 1440p, where the extra frame rate could theoretically provide a slight advantage. The data shows it provides 291 FPS at 1080p and 202 FPS at 1440p. However, the visual downgrade is significant, and the game's world detail is likely to suffer. The Ultra preset is not recommended, especially at 4K, where the 55 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS target. Even at 1440p, the 92 FPS average is lower than the High preset's 144 FPS, with no clear benefit in the data to justify the performance hit. The High preset is the best overall recommendation, with Medium as a strong alternative for 4K stability.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings is 144 FPS.

Q: Is the system capable of 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the data shows it can average 86 FPS at 4K with High settings and 120 FPS with Low settings, though the Ultra preset drops to 55 FPS.

Q: Which component is more likely to be the performance bottleneck?

A: The resolution scaling data indicates a GPU-bound system. The frame rate drops consistently as resolution increases, which is typical of a GPU limitation.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 4K experience?

A: The Medium preset is recommended for 4K, as it provides a 95 FPS average with a minimum of 80 FPS, offering better stability than the High preset.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score that is 0.3% lower than the AMD EPYC 4464P.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.