Greedfall

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT delivers a playable, though not flawless, experience in Greedfall, with the data indicating the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher settings and resolutions. This combination ranks in the 74th percentile (1273rd out of 1705 tested combos) in this specific title, placing it firmly in the mid-to-upper tier of tested systems. The benchmark results show a system that excels at 1080p and can manage 1440p, but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings, revealing a clear performance ceiling defined by the graphics card.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Greedfall?*

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the most comfortable territory, with average FPS ranging from 72.1 at Ultra settings to 148.2 at Low settings. At 2560x1440, the combo still performs well, but at 3840x2160, the frame rates drop significantly, with Ultra settings falling to 28.8 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70104, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-14700K (70074, 0% delta). It is also within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (70420) and 1.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71056), indicating it performs at the top tier of its class.

Q: Where does this GPU stand relative to its closest competitors?

A: The RX 5700 XT has an average benchmark score of 24731, placing it just 0.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763) and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Arc A350M (24647). Its performance is essentially neck-and-neck with these rivals, though it is 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the jump from Low to Ultra settings results in a significant performance cost. The average FPS drops from 148.2 on Low to 109.1 on High, 117.9 on Medium, and finally to 72.1 on Ultra, a reduction of over 51% from the Low preset.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance in this game?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor. At 4K Ultra, the system drops to 28.8 FPS, while at 1080p Low it reaches 148.2 FPS. This massive scaling with resolution and settings points to the RX 5700 XT being the primary constraint, as the 14700KF's high core count and clock speeds are sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions.

Q: How does the system's performance rank among all tested combinations?

A: In Greedfall, this specific combination of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ranks 1273rd out of 1705 tested combos. This places it in the upper-middle segment, showing it outperforms a significant portion of other systems but is not at the very top.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. With a 125W TDP and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, this CPU is a high-end desktop part designed to handle heavy multi-threaded workloads. Its synthetic benchmark scores are exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44557 and a single-core score of 6290, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs.

In the context of Greedfall, the CPU's role appears to be more about ensuring the GPU is never starved of data rather than being the primary driver of frame rates. The data shows that the system's FPS scales dramatically with resolution and settings, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. For instance, at 1080p Low, the system achieves 148.2 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it falls to 28.8 FPS. This indicates that the 14700KF's powerful multi-core performance, evidenced by its Passmark multi-thread score of 52425, is sufficient to handle the game's logic and streaming at all tested settings, allowing the graphics card to become the decisive factor in performance.

The processor's high single-thread performance, as seen in its Geekbench single-core score of 2972, likely contributes to consistent frame pacing and prevents CPU-related stutters. While the game is not new, the 14700KF's strong showing in benchmarks like Passmark physics (2961) suggests it provides a robust foundation. The fact that the combo's performance varies so widely between presets, from 148.2 FPS at 1080p Low to 28.8 FPS at 4K Ultra, strongly suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck, as a weak CPU would cause performance to plateau regardless of GPU load.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is built on the RDNA 1.0 architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 2560 shading units and operates at a boost clock of 1905 MHz, with a game clock of 1755 MHz. Its synthetic performance is substantial, with a Passmark G3D score of 16277 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2134, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs.

The benchmark results in Greedfall clearly show that the RX 5700 XT is the performance ceiling for this combo. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results tell a different story. At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to 42.5 on High and a barely playable 28.8 on Ultra. This is a direct consequence of the GPU's compute capabilities, as its FP32 performance is rated at 9.754 TFLOPS. The data indicates that while the card can handle the game at lower resolutions with ease, pushing 4K with high detail levels overwhelms its processing power.

The scaling from Medium to Ultra settings at each resolution highlights the GPU's limitations. At 1440p, the system goes from 82.5 FPS on Medium to 49.2 FPS on Ultra, a drop of over 40%. Similarly, at 1080p, it falls from 117.9 FPS on Medium to 72.1 FPS on Ultra. These reductions are consistent with a GPU that has a finite amount of processing power, and the significant frame rate penalties at Ultra settings suggest that the card's 64 ROPs and 160 TMUs are being saturated. The GPU is the clear limiting factor, especially when visual fidelity is maximized.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 is the recommended starting point, as it delivers a high average of 117.9 FPS. This is a significant improvement over the Ultra preset's 72.1 FPS, with a relatively modest visual downgrade. For players with high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset at 1080p provides an excellent 148.2 FPS, ensuring maximum smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the High preset offers a solid 72.1 FPS, which is ideal for immersive gameplay without sacrificing too much detail. The Ultra preset at this resolution, at 49.2 FPS, may be acceptable for slower-paced moments but will feel less smooth. The Medium preset at 1440p provides a good middle ground at 82.5 FPS, making it the best choice for those who want a high frame rate with better visuals than Low.

The 3840x2160 resolution is not recommended for this combo. Even the Low preset only manages an average of 61.9 FPS, and the High preset drops to 42.5 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is effectively unplayable at 28.8 FPS. The data suggests that players should avoid 4K on this system unless they are prepared to use the Low preset and accept a marginally playable frame rate. The sweet spot for this hardware is clearly 1080p Medium or High, where the combo can leverage its CPU power to maintain high frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is ranked 1273rd out of 1705 tested combos in Greedfall. This ranking places it in the upper-middle tier of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms roughly 25% of other combinations but is bested by a substantial majority. Given the CPU's high percentile rank (96th) and the GPU's lower rank (68th), this result is expected.

The combo's overall standing is dragged down by the GPU. While the 14700KF is a top-tier processor that rivals the Intel Core i7-14700K and AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in synthetic tests, the RX 5700 XT is a mid-range graphics card. Its performance, while close to the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and Intel Arc A350M, is not in the same league as modern high-end GPUs. This mismatch means the system's in-game performance is heavily constrained by the graphics card, preventing the CPU from showcasing its full potential in this title.

This ranking is a clear indicator that the system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming but will not compete with high-end configurations at 4K. The 1273rd position reflects a system that is a capable performer for most gamers but does not offer the top-tier frame rates seen in the highest-ranked combos. It is a solid, reliable setup that prioritizes a strong CPU foundation for future GPU upgrades.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the system is very capable, starting with a low of 148.2 FPS on Low and descending through 117.9 FPS on Medium, 109.1 FPS on High, and finally 72.1 FPS on Ultra. This shows a smooth, predictable degradation in performance as the settings are increased.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop noticeably but remain respectable. The Low preset yields 103.7 FPS, which is still very smooth. Medium delivers 82.5 FPS, and High produces 72.1 FPS, which is identical to the 1080p Ultra figure. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 49.2 FPS, which is the first sign of the GPU struggling. These numbers show that 1440p is viable for most settings, but Ultra is a heavy load.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a significant hit. The Low preset is the only one that provides a playable experience at 61.9 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 52.2 FPS, High is 42.5 FPS, and Ultra is a very choppy 28.8 FPS. The gap between the 1080p and 4K results is stark, with the Ultra preset losing over 60% of its performance when moving from the lowest to the highest resolution. This breakdown confirms the GPU is the primary bottleneck at high resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 72.1 at 1080p to 49.2 at 1440p (a 31.8% decrease) and then to 28.8 at 4K (a 60.1% decrease from 1080p). This steep drop-off is a clear sign that the RX 5700 XT's processing power is being quickly exhausted as the pixel count increases.

The scaling on the Low preset is less severe but still significant, with FPS falling from 148.2 at 1080p to 103.7 at 1440p and 61.9 at 4K. This suggests that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is still the limiting factor, as the CPU has ample headroom. The fact that the 14700KF's performance is not the constraint is further proven by the fact that the FPS drops are directly proportional to the resolution increase, which is a hallmark of a GPU-limited system.

The data indicates that the limiting component in this combo is unequivocally the graphics card. The CPU's robust multi-core performance, while excellent for other tasks, cannot compensate for the GPU's lack of fill rate and compute power at higher resolutions. For this system, the most efficient use of its hardware is to play at 1080p or 1440p, where the GPU's workload is more manageable and the powerful CPU can help maintain high frame rates.