Greedfall

The benchmark data for Greedfall, captured with an Intel Core i7-14700F and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, reveals a configuration that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but exhibits extraordinary headroom at 1080p. The measured frames per second (FPS) show that while the system can push well past 200 FPS at lower settings, the Ultra preset creates a significant bottleneck that scales predictably with resolution. This analysis breaks down the specific performance characteristics, the role of each component, and the optimal settings for this particular title.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and clearly indicates where the system’s limits lie. At the High preset, the average FPS falls from 208 at 1920x1080 to 144 at 2560x1440, and then to 86 at 3840x2160. This represents a 31% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a further 40% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The scaling is not linear; the jump to 4K demands significantly more from the GPU, confirming that the RTX 4070 Ti is the primary limiting factor at that resolution.

The pattern holds across other settings, though the percentage drops vary. With the Low preset, the system achieves 291 FPS at 1080p, 202 FPS at 1440p, and 120 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 31%, nearly identical to the High preset, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is 41%. This consistent 30-40% decline per resolution step highlights the classic GPU-bound scenario where pixel count directly dictates frame rate. The Ultra preset shows the steepest relative decline: 133 FPS at 1080p, 92 FPS at 1440p, and just 55 FPS at 4K. Here, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 31%, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is 40%.

What this data says about the limiting component is clear: the CPU is not a constraint at 1080p. The fact that the Low preset at 1080p hits 291 FPS suggests the Core i7-14700F is feeding frames far faster than most displays can show. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU as resolution increases. At 4K, even the Medium preset (95 FPS) struggles to maintain high refresh rates, and the Ultra preset (55 FPS) falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The data indicates that for 4K gaming, users must compromise on settings to achieve smooth gameplay, while at 1080p, the system has massive untapped potential that is only realized at lower settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its benchmark scores are exceptional, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. In multi-core tests, it scores 35,122 in Cinebench R23 and 19,620 in Geekbench multicore, while single-core performance is equally strong at 4,958 in Cinebench R23 and 2,429 in Geekbench singlecore. These numbers position it slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which has an average benchmark score 0.6% lower.

In Greedfall, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (291 FPS) demonstrates that the processor is not a limiting factor at standard resolutions. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU drops to 55 FPS, the CPU is clearly not struggling, as the frame rate is dictated by the graphics card’s rendering capability. The high single-thread performance (4,958 in Cinebench R23) is particularly relevant for an Action RPG like Greedfall, which typically relies on a few heavily loaded threads for AI and physics calculations.

The CPU’s 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample bandwidth for game data. The data shows that the i7-14700F is overkill for this title at 1080p, but it ensures that there is no CPU-induced stutter or frame pacing issues. The nearest rivals, including the Intel Xeon 6505P and Intel Xeon Phi 7290, have average scores within 0.3% of the i7-14700F, but their server-oriented designs are irrelevant for gaming. The conclusion is that the processor provides a rock-solid foundation, allowing the RTX 4070 Ti to be the sole determinant of frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable with this CPU and GPU combo in Greedfall?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 291, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This indicates the system is capable of extremely high frame rates when the GPU load is minimized.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti sufficient for 4K gaming in Greedfall?

A: The data shows it is marginal. At 4K with the High preset, the average FPS is 86, which is playable. However, the Ultra preset drops to 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 4K averages 95 FPS, making it a viable option for 4K.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 144 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 92 FPS. This is a 36% reduction in performance for the Ultra settings, which may not be visually justifiable to all users.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Medium settings at 1080p?

A: The Low preset averages 291 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 229 FPS. The Medium preset also shows a minimum FPS of 194 and a maximum of 263, indicating a wider variance than the Low preset’s stable output.

Q: Is the Core i7-14700F a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: Based on the data, no. Even at 1080p Low with 291 FPS, the CPU is not limiting performance. The frame rate scales inversely with resolution and settings, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck.

Q: How does this combo rank against other systems in Greedfall?

A: The combination ranks 523rd out of 3,703 tested combinations, placing it in the top 14% of all systems for this game. This is a strong result, though not the absolute top tier.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. With the Low preset, the average FPS is 291, a figure that exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors. The Medium preset averages 229 FPS, with a minimum of 194 and a maximum of 263, showing some frame time variance but remaining exceptionally smooth. The High preset averages 208 FPS, which is still far above any standard 144Hz display’s capability. The Ultra preset is the most demanding at 1080p, averaging 133 FPS. This is a significant drop from High (a 36% reduction), but it remains playable on high refresh rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but start to show the GPU’s workload. The Low preset averages 202 FPS, a 31% drop from 1080p. The Medium preset averages 159 FPS, with a minimum of 135 and a maximum of 182. The High preset averages 144 FPS, which is perfectly suited for a 144Hz monitor. The Ultra preset drops to 92 FPS, which is still smooth but represents a 36% reduction from High. At this resolution, the RTX 4070 Ti is still performing admirably, with all presets except Ultra maintaining over 140 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens. The Low preset averages 120 FPS, which is a solid result for 4K. The Medium preset averages 95 FPS, with a minimum of 80 and a maximum of 109. The High preset averages 86 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS comfort zone. The Ultra preset averages 55 FPS, which falls below the standard for smooth gameplay. The data shows a clear progression: 4K requires either lowering settings to Medium or High, or accepting a sub-60 FPS experience with Ultra.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the star of this benchmark, and its specifications explain the performance profile. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 7,680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2610 MHz. Its compute power is rated at 40.09 TFLOPS for FP32 operations. These specifications place it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44,795.

In Greedfall, the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth are crucial. The game’s textures and geometry at 4K can stress the 12 GB frame buffer, but the measured FPS does not indicate any memory-related stuttering. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, scores 0.8% higher on average, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 1.3% higher. This puts the RTX 4070 Ti in a competitive tier, though it is not the top performer.

The data shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences between presets. At 1080p, the difference between Low (291 FPS) and Ultra (133 FPS) is 158 FPS, indicating that the GPU is being pushed harder by the Ultra settings’ increased shading and texture demands. At 4K, the same comparison shows a drop from 120 FPS to 55 FPS, a 65 FPS difference. The GPU’s 208.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 626.4 GTexel/s texture rate are the metrics that govern these results. The card’s 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores are not directly relevant to Greedfall’s rasterized rendering, but they contribute to the overall feature set.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data provides a clear hierarchy for optimal settings based on resolution and target frame rate. For 1080p users with high refresh rate displays (144Hz or 165Hz), the High preset at 208 FPS is the best choice, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (229 FPS) with only a 9% performance penalty. The Ultra preset at 133 FPS is still viable for 144Hz displays but offers diminishing returns for the 36% FPS loss compared to High. For competitive play or maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 291 FPS is available, but the visual compromise is steep.

At 1440p, the High preset at 144 FPS is the sweet spot for 144Hz monitors, delivering a perfect match between frame rate and refresh rate. The Medium preset at 159 FPS offers a 10% boost but with lower visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 92 FPS is acceptable for 60Hz displays but fails to take advantage of higher refresh rates. For 60Hz displays at 1440p, the Ultra preset provides the best image quality without sacrificing smoothness, as 92 FPS is well above the 60 FPS threshold.

For 4K displays, the recommendations change dramatically. The Ultra preset at 55 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the 60 FPS standard and may feel less responsive. The High preset at 86 FPS is the best balance of visual quality and performance, providing a smooth experience on 60Hz displays and even allowing for some headroom. The Medium preset at 95 FPS is a strong alternative for those who prefer higher frame rates, offering a 10% improvement over High. The Low preset at 120 FPS is only recommended for users with 120Hz+ 4K displays who prioritize speed over fidelity. In summary, the measured rows suggest that High settings are the universal recommendation for this hardware, with Medium as a fallback for 4K users seeking higher frame rates.