Greedfall

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX paired with the Intel Core i5-14400F delivers a commanding performance profile in Greedfall, with the data showing a combination that scales aggressively across resolutions. The measured results place this configuration in the 562nd rank out of 3,703 tested combos, indicating a top-tier setup for this Action RPG. The frame rates achieved at 1080p and 1440p are exceptionally high, suggesting the system is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate displays, while 4K performance remains solidly playable, though with a noticeable drop-off at the most demanding preset.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a classic resolution scaling curve, where the GPU becomes an increasingly dominant factor as pixel count rises. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 290 FPS, which is an extraordinarily high ceiling. This number indicates that at this resolution, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough frames to reach near-vertical limits, and the system is far from being constrained by the graphics card. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 201 FPS, a reduction of roughly 30% from the 1080p figure, which is a typical and expected scaling factor as the GPU begins to work harder on rendering more pixels.

The transition from 1440p to 4K at Low settings shows another significant step down, with the average falling from 201 FPS to 120 FPS. This 40% decrease is a strong indicator that the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is now the primary limiting component, as the workload has shifted heavily onto the graphics processor. The pattern is consistent across all settings; for instance, at High settings, the frame rate drops from 207 FPS at 1080p to 143 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 85 FPS at 4K. This scaling behavior is typical for a high-end GPU, where the raw compute power is abundant at lower resolutions but becomes the bottleneck as the resolution increases.

The data also shows that the gap between 1080p and 1440p is smaller than the gap between 1440p and 4K. At High settings, the difference between 1080p and 1440p is 64 FPS, while the difference between 1440p and 4K is 58 FPS, which is a smaller absolute delta but a larger percentage drop. This suggests that the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s and its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory are sufficient for 1440p, but the sheer pixel throughput required at 4K begins to tax the card more heavily. The 4K Ultra preset, which averages 55 FPS, highlights this limitation clearly, as it represents a 54% drop from the 4K High preset’s 85 FPS, showing that the most demanding settings at the highest resolution are where the hardware is pushed to its limits.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the star of this configuration, and its specifications explain the high frame rates observed. With a boost clock of 2498 MHz and a game clock of 2365 MHz, the card is running at high frequencies, which directly contributes to the strong performance in Greedfall. The 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus yields a massive 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that is crucial for feeding the GPU’s 6144 shading units and 192 ROPs at high resolutions. This memory configuration is particularly relevant for 4K gaming, where texture data and frame buffers demand substantial bandwidth to avoid stuttering or frame drops.

The GPU’s architecture, RDNA 3.0, is built on a 5 nm process from TSMC, which allows for a high transistor density of 109.1M per mm² across a 529 mm² die. This translates to a theoretical FP32 performance of 61.39 TFLOPS, which is more than enough to handle the graphical demands of a 2019 Action RPG like Greedfall. The benchmark results corroborate this, with a Passmark G3D score of 31,238 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,841, placing the card in the 64th percentile of all GPUs. While the nearest rivals in the database, such as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, show a delta of only 0.4%, this is a misleading comparison based on average benchmark scores, as the raw specs and measured FPS in this game tell a far more favorable story for the RX 7900 XTX.

The measured FPS data shows the GPU’s role clearly. At 4K Ultra, the average of 55 FPS is the lowest measured, but it is still a playable frame rate. The card’s ability to maintain 85 FPS at 4K High shows that it has headroom to spare, and the jump to 120 FPS at 4K Low demonstrates that the GPU is not the limiting factor until the settings are pushed to their maximum. The fact that the card is rated for a 355 W TDP and supports PCIe 4.0 x16 ensures it can sustain these performance levels without bandwidth constraints. The dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin power connectors are standard for this class of hardware, and the data confirms that the GPU is performing as expected, with no signs of thermal or power throttling in the measured results.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F serves as the supporting pillar in this setup, and its specifications indicate it is more than capable of keeping up with the high-end GPU. With 10 cores and 16 threads, the processor offers a strong multi-threaded foundation, which is beneficial for the background tasks and game logic in Greedfall. The base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz provide a wide frequency range, allowing the CPU to scale its performance based on workload. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache is another positive indicator, as it helps reduce latency when accessing frequently used data.

The CPU’s benchmark scores paint a picture of a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range processor. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and a single-core score of 3,055 show that the chip is competitive in its class. The Passmark multi-thread score of 25,470 and single-thread score of 3,701 further confirm this, placing the CPU in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Intel Core i9-11900, show deltas of 0.1% and 0.2% respectively, indicating that the i5-14400F is statistically tied with these alternatives in synthetic benchmarks. This is a strong sign that the CPU is not a bottleneck in gaming scenarios.

In the context of Greedfall, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The measured FPS at 1080p Low, which averages 290 FPS, is a direct testament to the CPU’s capabilities. At this resolution and settings level, the GPU is often idle waiting for data, and the fact that the system can achieve such high frame rates shows that the i5-14400F’s single-core performance is excellent. The 4.70 GHz boost clock is particularly important here, as Greedfall likely relies on a few heavily threaded tasks. The data shows that even at 1440p High, the CPU maintains a 143 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold, proving that the processor is not holding back the GPU until the resolution is pushed to 4K with Ultra settings, where the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo to achieve high refresh rates?

A: At 1440p with High settings, the combo averages 143 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Even at 1440p Ultra, it maintains 91 FPS, making it a strong choice for 1440p gaming.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K with maximum settings?

A: At 4K Ultra, the average frame rate is 55 FPS. This is playable but not ideal for competitive gaming, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold. For 4K, High settings are recommended, yielding 85 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data shows that at 1080p and 1440p, the GPU is the primary limiter, as frame rates scale predictably with resolution. At 1080p Low, the 290 FPS average suggests the CPU has headroom, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck as resolution and settings increase.

Q: How does the RX 7900 XTX compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 19,410, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (19,334) and NVIDIA TITAN Xp (19,177), with deltas of 0.4% and 1.2%, respectively. However, these scores do not reflect gaming performance in Greedfall.

Q: What is the frame time consistency at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 1440p Medium, the system records an average of 158 FPS, with a minimum of 134 FPS and a maximum of 181 FPS. This suggests a consistent frame pacing with minor fluctuations.

Q: Does the CPU’s 10-core configuration benefit this game?

A: While Greedfall may not utilize all 10 cores, the 16 threads ensure that background processes do not interfere with game performance. The high single-core score of 3,055 in Cinebench R23 is likely more impactful for this title.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy for settings, allowing for an informed recommendation based on the desired experience. For players targeting the highest possible refresh rates, the Low preset at 1080p offers an average of 290 FPS, which is a staggering figure that will satisfy the most demanding esports-style play. However, this comes at the cost of visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 1080p, averaging 228 FPS, is a better balance for those who want a competitive edge without sacrificing too much detail.

For the best overall experience on a high-refresh-rate monitor, the High preset at 1440p is the sweet spot. It delivers an average of 143 FPS, which is well above the 120 Hz refresh rate of many gaming monitors, and the visual quality is notably better than Medium. The Ultra preset at 1440p, with an average of 91 FPS, is also viable for gamers who prioritize image quality over raw frame rate, as it remains above 60 FPS. At 4K, the High preset is the recommended choice, averaging 85 FPS, which is smooth and immersive. The Ultra preset at 4K, at 55 FPS, is playable but shows the system’s limits, and the data suggests that High is the optimal balance of performance and quality at this resolution.

The data also highlights that the jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs only 15 FPS on average (158 to 143), while the jump from High to Ultra costs a significant 52 FPS (143 to 91). This indicates that High settings offer the best performance-per-quality ratio in the measured range. Similarly, at 4K, the difference between High and Ultra is 30 FPS (85 to 55), making High the clear recommendation for a stable experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete set of measured frame rates is presented below, organized by resolution and settings preset. All values are average FPS unless otherwise noted.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: 290 FPS average
• Medium: 228 FPS average (minimum 193 FPS, maximum 262 FPS)
• High: 207 FPS average
• Ultra: 132 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: 201 FPS average
• Medium: 158 FPS average (minimum 134 FPS, maximum 181 FPS)
• High: 143 FPS average
• Ultra: 91 FPS average

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: 120 FPS average
• Medium: 94 FPS average (minimum 80 FPS, maximum 108 FPS)
• High: 85 FPS average
• Ultra: 55 FPS average

The data shows a consistent pattern across all resolutions, with each step up in settings yielding a predictable decrease in frame rate. The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum values, showing a spread of 69 FPS at 1080p (193 to 262), 47 FPS at 1440p (134 to 181), and 28 FPS at 4K (80 to 108). This suggests that the variance in frame times increases at lower resolutions, likely due to CPU workload fluctuations, while at 4K, the GPU-bound nature of the workload leads to more consistent output. The Ultra preset at 4K, with its 55 FPS average, is the lowest measured value, indicating that this is the most demanding configuration tested.