Greedfall

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks 743rd out of 3,703 tested combinations in Greedfall. This places the combo in the top 20% of all tested systems, a strong position for a game that is several years old. The rank reflects a balance between a mid-range 11th Gen CPU and a high-end RDNA 3 GPU, and the data shows that this pairing is capable of delivering smooth gameplay across most settings and resolutions.

Benchmark results indicate that the combo’s standing is driven primarily by the GPU’s raw throughput, as the CPU’s percentile rank among all processors is 71, while the GPU sits at a lower 55th percentile among all graphics cards. This discrepancy suggests that the processor is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. The measured FPS figures reinforce this, as the combo achieves triple-digit averages at 1080p and 1440p on most presets, only dropping below 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. In the context of all tested combos, the 743rd rank is respectable, and the data shows that this system outperforms a significant majority of configurations, particularly those with older or lower-tier components.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Rocket Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 14 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 12 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode, offering a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. These specifications place it as a solid mid-range desktop part, and its benchmark scores confirm its capability for gaming workloads.

In synthetic tests, the i5-11400F scores 14,340 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,024 in single-core, which are respectable figures for a 6-core part. Its Passmark multithread score is 16,908, and it achieves a single-thread score of 2,981. The CPU’s nearest rivals in overall average benchmark score include the AMD EPYC 7H12 (0.3% higher), Intel Core i5-12450H (0.4% lower), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (0.6% lower), and Intel Core Ultra 7 164U (0.6% higher). These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the i5-11400F performs on par with a range of other processors from different generations and market segments.

For Greedfall, an Action RPG that is not heavily threaded, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is more than sufficient. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU can feed the GPU effectively, as FPS averages reach as high as 268 on Low settings, indicating that the processor is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions. Even at 4K, where the GPU load is highest, the CPU’s single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 868 score in 3DMark single-thread, is adequate to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU’s 71st percentile ranking among all processors further suggests that it outperforms a majority of CPUs in general benchmarks, which translates to solid gaming performance in this title.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the dominant component in this combo, featuring the Navi 31 chip on a 5 nm process with 57,700 million transistors. It has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. The GPU’s clock speeds are 1,387 MHz base, 2,025 MHz game, and 2,394 MHz boost, with memory running at 2,500 MHz (20 Gbps effective). It includes 5,376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, along with 84 ray tracing cores. The compute power is substantial, with an FP32 throughput of 51.48 TFLOPS.

In benchmark tests, the RX 7900 XT scores 29,009 in Passmark G3D and 16,828 in GPU compute, while its DirectX 12 score is 110 and DirectX 11 is 340. Its average benchmark score is 13,745, placing it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 660M (0.5% lower), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (0.5% lower), AMD Radeon RX 570X (0.9% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (1.5% higher). These comparisons show that the RX 7900 XT is closely matched with a range of other cards in overall synthetic performance, though its real-world gaming results in Greedfall are what matter most here.

The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is far more than Greedfall requires, even at 4K, and the high memory bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and high-resolution assets do not cause stutters. The data supports this, as the measured FPS at 4K High is 79, which is smooth for a demanding resolution. The GPU’s role becomes more apparent at 1440p and 1080p, where it pushes frame rates well beyond 100 FPS on most settings. At 4K Ultra, the FPS drops to 50, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint at the highest settings, but this is an extreme scenario that the card still handles at a playable level.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves an average of 268 FPS on Low, 210 FPS on Medium (with a min of 179 and max of 242), 191 FPS on High, and 122 FPS on Ultra. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is heavily GPU-bound at lower settings, but even at Ultra, it maintains a high frame rate that exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 186 FPS on Low, 146 FPS on Medium (min 124, max 168), 132 FPS on High, and 84 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is noticeable but not drastic, with the Low setting still delivering nearly 200 FPS. The Ultra setting at 1440p, at 84 FPS, remains well within the range of smooth gameplay for most users.

At 3840x2160, the performance scales down further: 111 FPS on Low, 87 FPS on Medium (min 74, max 100), 79 FPS on High, and 50 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show that the GPU is the limiting factor, especially on Ultra, where the frame rate drops below 60. However, High settings at 4K still provide a very playable 79 FPS, and even Medium maintains an 87 FPS average. The data shows a consistent trend: as resolution increases, the gap between Low and Ultra settings narrows in terms of absolute FPS, but the relative performance penalty of Ultra grows.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the limiting component in this combo. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 268 at 1080p to 186 at 1440p (a 30.6% decrease) and then to 111 at 4K (a 40.3% decrease from 1440p). This steep drop indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the CPU’s workload does not increase proportionally with resolution. The same pattern holds for Medium and High settings, where the FPS decreases by roughly 30-40% at each resolution step.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is even more pronounced: from 122 FPS at 1080p to 84 FPS at 1440p (a 31.1% drop) and then to 50 FPS at 4K (a 40.5% drop). This consistent 30-40% reduction in FPS for each resolution increase is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is able to maintain frame delivery even at 1080p, where the FPS exceeds 250, suggesting that it is not a significant constraint. The data indicates that the RX 7900 XT’s rendering throughput is what governs performance, and as pixel count rises, the GPU’s workload scales linearly, leading to the observed FPS declines.

The fact that the combo ranks 743rd out of 3,703 in this game, despite the GPU’s high-end status, suggests that other combinations with more powerful CPUs might achieve higher frame rates at 1080p. However, at 4K, the differences would be minimal, as the GPU is the clear limiting factor. The resolution scaling data makes it evident that for this pairing, the GPU should be the focus for any performance tuning, and that the CPU has ample headroom to support even more powerful graphics cards.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the user’s resolution and refresh rate preferences. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 122 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors (120Hz or above). For users with 144Hz or 165Hz displays, the High preset at 191 FPS or even Medium at 210 FPS would be better suited to maximize the display’s potential, as these settings offer a substantial FPS boost with only a modest visual quality reduction. The Low preset at 268 FPS is only recommended for competitive play where every frame matters, as the visual sacrifice is significant.

At 1440p, the Ultra preset at 84 FPS is playable but not ideal for high-refresh displays. The High preset at 132 FPS strikes the best balance, providing a smooth experience on 120Hz and 144Hz monitors while maintaining high visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 146 FPS is also a viable option for users who prioritize frame rate over maximum detail, and the Low preset at 186 FPS is overkill for most displays. For 1440p, High is the recommended setting, as it offers the best combination of visual quality and performance.

At 4K, the choices are more constrained. The Ultra preset at 50 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold that most users consider smooth, so it is not recommended unless the user has a 60Hz display and values maximum detail. The High preset at 79 FPS is the clear winner, delivering a smooth experience on 60Hz and 75Hz displays with high visual quality. The Medium preset at 87 FPS offers a slight FPS boost but at a noticeable visual cost, and the Low preset at 111 FPS is only for users who prioritize frame rate above all else. For 4K, High is the recommended setting, as it provides the best experience per the measured data.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s ranking among all tested configurations in Greedfall?

A: The Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combo ranks 743rd out of 3,703 tested combinations, placing it in the top 20% of all systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17,177, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 7H12, 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-12450H, 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G, and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U.

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS at 1920x1080 is 268, achieved on Low settings. The Medium setting delivers 210 FPS, High delivers 191 FPS, and Ultra delivers 122 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K resolution?

A: The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, as FPS drops from 122 at 1080p Ultra to 50 at 4K Ultra, a reduction that scales with pixel count and indicates GPU-bound performance.

Q: Does the combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra?

A: No, at 4K Ultra the average FPS is 50, which is below 60. However, at 4K High the average FPS is 79, and at 4K Medium it is 87, both of which exceed 60 FPS.

Q: What settings are recommended for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: For a 144Hz display at 2560x1440, the High setting is recommended, as it delivers 132 FPS on average, which is close to the refresh rate, while Medium at 146 FPS is also a viable option for higher frame rates.