Greedfall

Benchmark results for Greedfall with the Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT are measured across three resolutions and four presets. The pairing ranks 1072nd out of 1705 tested combos in this game, with the CPU at the 75th percentile of all tested CPUs and the GPU at the 63rd percentile of all tested GPUs. Across the measured rows, the combo shows strong average frame rates at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 for most settings, then a sharp drop at 3840x2160.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor from Rocket Lake, running at a 2.60 GHz base clock and a 4.40 GHz boost clock. It has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, dual-channel DDR4 support, and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which matches the Radeon RX 7600 XT's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. In synthetic tests, the i5-11400F scores 14372 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2029 in single-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 16908 and a PassMark single-thread score of 2981. Its average benchmark score is 17181, placing it at the 75th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals in the database are effectively tied with this chip. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700U scores 17189 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17212 with a -0.2% delta, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U scores 17215 with a -0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i5-1240U scores 17141 with a 0.2% delta. For Greedfall, this means the CPU is not an outlier in either direction. The game is an action RPG from 2019, and the measured results show that the processor can feed very high frame rates at lower resolution: at 1920x1080 Low, the average FPS is 161.1. The same CPU/GPU pairing at 3840x2160 Low drops to 63.8, so the limit shifts decisively to the GPU as pixel count rises.

FAQ

Q: What is the fastest measured preset in the data?

A: 1920x1080 Low produces an average of 161.1 FPS. Medium is 124.4, High is 113.4, and Ultra is 74.1 at the same resolution.

Q: Can this combo run Greedfall at 3840x2160 smoothly?

A: Only Low settings reach a solid average, at 63.8 FPS. Medium averages 50.2, High averages 48.9, and Ultra drops to 27.8.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17181. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700U is at 17189 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i7-1260P is at 17212 with a -0.2% delta, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is at 17215 with a -0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i5-1240U is at 17141 with a 0.2% delta. These are effectively tie scores.

Q: What about the GPU's position among rivals?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 20146 and sits at the 63rd GPU percentile. It is 0.6% below the RX 7600 (20258), 0.3% above the RX 460 (20088), 1.9% above the RTX 2060 SUPER (19774), and 1.9% below the RTX 3070 Mobile (20534).

Q: Which resolution delivers the highest average at High settings?

A: 1920x1080 High averages 113.4 FPS. 2560x1440 High averages 79.0, and 3840x2160 High averages 48.9.

Q: What do the CPU's multi-threaded scores suggest for this game?

A: The 3DMark max-thread score is 5652, Cinebench R23 multi-core is 14372, and Geekbench multi-core is 7579. These scores point to a 6-core/12-thread part with enough parallel throughput to keep Greedfall moving at high frame rates in the measured rows.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the tested database, this Core i5-11400F and RX 7600 XT combination ranks 1072nd out of 1705 combos for Greedfall. That puts the pairing in the lower half of the field. The CPU's 75th percentile and the GPU's 63rd percentile explain the result: neither component is near the top of its category, and the measured frame rates, while strong at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, do not stand out among the full set of tested combinations. The rank reflects the whole data set, not just this game's playability. In practical terms, this combo still produces 161.1 FPS at 1920x1080 Low, 124.4 at Medium, and 113.4 at High. At 2560x1440 it delivers 111.9 on Low, 86.4 on Medium, and 79.0 on High, so the lower-middle ranking is more about competition than about the experience being weak.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data includes only average FPS; minimum and maximum values were not recorded. The rows break down as follows:

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 48.9 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 63.8 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 50.2 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27.8 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 79.0 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 111.9 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 86.4 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.8 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 113.4 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 161.1 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 124.4 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 74.1 |

At 1920x1080, Low and Medium leave a large gap over Ultra. At 2560x1440, High and Medium remain well ahead of Ultra. At 3840x2160, only Low stays above the other presets, while High and Medium sit close together at 48.9 and 50.2.

Resolution Scaling

Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 reduces average FPS across every preset. The High preset goes from 113.4 to 79.0 to 48.9. Low goes from 161.1 to 111.9 to 63.8. Medium goes from 124.4 to 86.4 to 50.2. Ultra goes from 74.1 to 52.8 to 27.8.

This steady drop points to a GPU-limited configuration. If the CPU were the main constraint, the resolution change would not alter the average FPS by this magnitude. The i5-11400F can push 161.1 FPS at 1920x1080 Low, but the same Low preset at 3840x2160 drops to 63.8. That behavior is typical of a card whose compute and memory bandwidth are being saturated by higher pixel counts. The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, but the measured frames show that Ultra at high resolution is beyond its practical range.

Settings Recommendations

The best preset depends on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, Medium and High are the strongest measured options. Medium averages 124.4 FPS and High averages 113.4, so both preserve visual quality while maintaining high frame rates. Low is faster at 161.1 but lowers the visual preset. Ultra at 74.1 is playable, but it costs a large amount of average FPS relative to Medium.

At 2560x1440, High is the recommended preset. It averages 79.0 FPS, while Medium averages 86.4 and Low averages 111.9. The difference between Medium and High is small enough that High offers the better balance of image quality and frame rate. Ultra at 52.8 falls behind the other presets and is the only 2560x1440 row that drops below a smooth average.

At 3840x2160, Low is the only preset with a solid average at 63.8. Medium and High are at 50.2 and 48.9 respectively, which are borderline for smooth play, and Ultra at 27.8 should be avoided. Overall, the measured data points to 2560x1440 High as the best experience for this pairing, with 1920x1080 Medium or High as the fallback if higher frame rates are needed.