Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing delivers a commanding performance in Greedfall, placing 39th out of 1705 tested combos. This places the system in the top 2.3% of all configurations, underscoring its status as a high-end platform for this Action RPG. The measured frame rates reveal a consistent hierarchy across settings and resolutions, with the RTX 4090’s immense graphics power frequently pushing the CPU to its limits, particularly at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

The data presents a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate, but the optimal choice depends heavily on the target display. At 4K, the Ultra preset yields an average of 66 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The High preset, however, jumps to 106.8 FPS, a 61.8% improvement over Ultra, while presumably retaining most of the visual enhancements. This makes High the clear recommendation for 4K, as it provides a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience without the severe performance penalty of Ultra.

For 1440p, the calculus shifts. Ultra delivers 111 FPS, which is already excellent for most monitors. The High preset at 175.9 FPS is tempting for 144Hz or 165Hz displays, but the jump from Ultra to High here is only 58.5% (from 111 to 175.9), which is less dramatic than at 4K. The Medium preset offers a staggering 194.7 FPS, making it ideal for competitive play if the visual downgrade is acceptable. At 1080p, the story is about maximizing refresh rates. Ultra still hits 162.2 FPS, but Medium (277.5 FPS) and High (251.8 FPS) are the standouts, allowing users to fully exploit 240Hz panels. Low is generally unnecessary, as even Ultra at 1080p exceeds the refresh rate of most standard monitors.

The benchmark results indicate that the High preset provides the best balance of image quality and performance across all three resolutions. It is the only preset that consistently stays above 100 FPS at 4K, while simultaneously offering high triple-digit frame rates at 1440p and 1080p. For users prioritizing maximum visual quality on a 1440p monitor, Ultra remains a viable choice, but High is the safest default for a flawless experience.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the undisputed driver of this system’s performance in Greedfall. Its 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, ensures that texture streaming and memory allocation are never a bottleneck, even at 4K Ultra settings. The GPU’s architecture, Ada Lovelace, with its 16,384 shading units and 128 RT cores, is more than capable of handling the game’s rendering workloads. The core clock dynamics, with a base of 2235 MHz and a boost of 2520 MHz, allow the card to scale performance aggressively under load.

The data shows a clear GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At 4K, the frame rate drops from 147 FPS on Low to 66 FPS on Ultra, a 55.1% reduction. This steep decline indicates that the game is heavily reliant on the GPU’s pixel-pushing capabilities at 4K. The RTX 4090’s 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate is being taxed by the increased resolution, and the higher settings add more complex shading and effects, further amplifying the load. The fact that the GPU can still maintain an average of 106.8 FPS at 4K High reflects its raw power.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic pattern of CPU and GPU interplay. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 352 FPS. This is an exceptionally high number, suggesting that the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, is the primary limiting factor at this point. The GPU is so powerful that it can render frames faster than the CPU can feed it data, creating a CPU-bound scenario.

As the resolution increases, the load shifts to the GPU. At 4K Low, the average FPS drops to 147, a 58.2% decrease from the 1080p Low result. This massive drop indicates that the GPU is now the bottleneck, as the number of pixels to be processed quadruples. The pattern is consistent across all settings. For High, the drop from 251.8 FPS at 1080p to 106.8 FPS at 4K represents a 57.6% reduction. For Ultra, the drop is even more pronounced, going from 162.2 FPS to 66 FPS, a 59.3% decrease. This data confirms that while the 5950X is a formidable CPU, the RTX 4090’s performance ceiling is the deciding factor in frame rate scaling as resolution increases.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X a bottleneck for the RTX 4090 in this game?

A: At 1080p with Low settings, the system hits 352 FPS, which is a strong indicator of a CPU limit. The Ryzen 9 5950X, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, is powerful, but the RTX 4090 can outpace it at such low graphical workloads. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as evidenced by the significant frame rate drop.

Q: What is the best preset for a 4K 120Hz monitor?

A: The High preset is the only one that can consistently achieve an average FPS above 120 on a 4K display, delivering 106.8 FPS. The Medium preset (112.8 FPS) is close, but High offers better visuals. Ultra at 66 FPS is not suitable for 120Hz displays.

Q: How much faster is the 4K Ultra preset compared to the 4K Low preset?

A: The frame rate drops from 147 FPS on Low to 66 FPS on Ultra at 4K. This is a 55.1% reduction in performance, illustrating the massive cost of enabling the highest visual settings.

Q: Can the system handle 240Hz gaming?

A: Yes, at 1080p. The Medium preset achieves 277.5 FPS, and High hits 251.8 FPS, both exceeding the 240Hz threshold. At 1440p, the Medium preset gets 194.7 FPS, which is below 240Hz but still very high.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to all other tested systems?

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is ranked 39th out of 1705 tested combos in Greedfall. This puts it in the top 2.3% of all systems, indicating excellent performance.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the High and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, the High preset averages 175.9 FPS, while Ultra averages 111 FPS. This represents a 58.5% performance advantage for the High preset, making it a much smoother experience if you prefer higher frame rates over maximum visual detail.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 configuration secures the 39th position out of 1705 tested combos. This rank is a strong indicator of a top-tier gaming experience. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 49062 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-14600K (with a delta of -0.2%) and the AMD EPYC 4345P (with a delta of -1.1%), are all extremely close in synthetic performance. This suggests the 5950X is not holding the system back.

The GPU, meanwhile, sits in the 91st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66473. Its nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, are within a 1.3% delta, but these are professional or workstation cards, not gaming-focused. The RTX 4090’s raw gaming performance is far superior. The combination of a CPU in the top 7% and a GPU in the top 9% results in a system that excels in Greedfall, with the 39th rank out of 1705 combos confirming that very few systems can match its frame rates.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, with its 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, provides a substantial foundation for gaming. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz allow for strong single-threaded performance, which is crucial for game logic and physics. In synthetic benchmarks like Cinebench R23, it scores 38607 in multi-core and 5450 in single-core, showing its ability to handle both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks.

In Greedfall, the CPU’s role becomes apparent at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system hits 352 FPS, which is a clear sign that the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU is capable of rendering even more frames. The 3DMark scores reinforce this, with a max-thread score of 11597 and a single-thread score of 944. The CPU’s 64 MB of L3 cache is also beneficial for gaming, as it reduces memory latency and improves data access. While the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at 4K, its robust performance ensures that it can keep up with the RTX 4090’s immense rendering speed at 1440p and 1080p, preventing it from holding back the system’s overall frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average FPS measurements from the benchmark data.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|:--------- |:------- | ------: |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Ultra | 66.0 |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | High | 106.8 |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Medium | 112.8 |

| 3840x2160 (4K) | Low | 147.0 |

| 2560x1440 (1440p) | Ultra | 111.0 |

| 2560x1440 (1440p) | High | 175.9 |

| 2560x1440 (1440p) | Medium | 194.7 |

| 2560x1440 (1440p) | Low | 241.2 |

| 1920x1080 (1080p) | Ultra | 162.2 |

| 1920x1080 (1080p) | High | 251.8 |

| 1920x1080 (1080p) | Medium | 277.5 |

| 1920x1080 (1080p) | Low | 352.0 |

The data shows a consistent pattern. At every resolution, the Low preset offers the highest frame rate, followed by Medium, then High, and finally Ultra with the lowest. The gap between Medium and High is generally smaller than the gap between High and Ultra, suggesting that the Ultra preset introduces a disproportionately heavy performance cost. The frame rate differences also shrink as resolution increases, but the relative ordering remains stable. This breakdown allows users to precisely predict performance for their specific monitor and graphical preferences.