Greedfall

Greedfall is an Action RPG that places distinct demands on both processor and graphics hardware. The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Arc B370 produces a specific performance profile that is heavily skewed by the graphics solution. The data shows this pairing ranks 2699 out of 2938 tested combos for this title, placing it in the lower percentile of systems. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS results to explain why this configuration behaves as it does, focusing on the capabilities of each component as documented in the benchmark data.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The CPU’s base clock is 3.90 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This processor features a substantial cache hierarchy, including 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. For memory, it supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 9600X demonstrates strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. Its 3dmark single-thread score is 1253, while its 3dmark max-threads score is 7590. The Cinebench R23 scores are 2183.5 for single-core and 17528.5 for multi-core. Geekbench results show 2923 for single-core and 14438 for multi-core. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29713, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in average score include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656, 0.2% slower), the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, 0.5% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879, 0.6% faster). This data suggests the 9600X is a very capable processor, unlikely to be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

For Greedfall, the CPU’s role is to manage game logic, AI, and draw calls. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the average FPS reaches 76. When settings are increased to Ultra at the same resolution, the average FPS drops to 35. This significant drop across settings, even at a resolution where the CPU typically has more influence, indicates that the processor is not the limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively stable across different graphics settings, as the CPU work would be similar. The fact that FPS scales directly with graphics settings suggests that the GPU is handling most of the performance load. The Ryzen 5 9600X’s high single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread score of 1253) and multi-thread capabilities (3dmark 16-threads score of 7585) provide ample headroom for Greedfall’s engine, which is from 2019 and likely not heavily threaded. The data indicates the CPU has enough throughput to feed the GPU, but the GPU’s output limits the final frame rate.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is a mobile-focused graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, with the chip codenamed Panther Lake. It is built on Intel’s 3 nm process. The GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. A notable aspect of this GPU is its memory configuration: it uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it does not have its own dedicated VRAM but instead relies on the system’s main memory. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," which indicates a significant performance limitation.

In terms of compute resources, the Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 20 render output units (ROPs). It also includes 10 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS. The GPU’s TDP is remarkably low at 25 W, and it is classified as an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) with no power connectors and a slot width of "IGP." Its only benchmark score is 1184 on the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in score are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, 0.2% faster), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, 0.5% faster), and AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, 0.7% faster). These rivals are all much older, lower-end parts, which contextualizes the Arc B370’s performance level.

The GPU’s role in Greedfall is clearly the dominant factor in this combo’s performance. The measured FPS data shows that the Arc B370 struggles with even moderate settings. At 1080p Low, it achieves 76 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it falls to 35 FPS. The reliance on system-shared memory is a critical bottleneck, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth and latency. This is evident in the frame time data; at 1440p Medium, the min FPS is 35 and the max is 48, showing a wide variance. The GPU’s low percentile ranking (5th) and its proximity to legacy parts like the HD 5770 (which was released over a decade prior) demonstrate that it is not designed for high-end gaming. The data suggests that the Arc B370 is a limiting factor for this game, and its performance is closer to entry-level integrated graphics than to a dedicated gaming GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and the Intel Arc B370 in their respective benchmark fields?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29713, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This shows a massive disparity in relative performance, with the CPU being a high-end part and the GPU being an entry-level part.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rival, the ATI Radeon HD 5770?

A: The Arc B370 has a 3dmark Steel Nomad score of 1184, while the ATI Radeon HD 5770 has a score of 1190. The HD 5770 is 0.5% faster according to the deltaPct value.

Q: What is the impact of the Intel Arc B370 using "System Shared" memory?

A: The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." This means the GPU does not have dedicated VRAM and relies on the system’s main memory, which is a significant performance limitation compared to a dedicated graphics card with its own memory pool.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X?

A: The base clock is 3.90 GHz and the boost clock is 5.40 GHz.

Q: What is the best average FPS achieved by this combo at 1080p?

A: The best average FPS at 1920x1080 is 76, which is achieved with Low settings.

Q: At which resolution and settings does this combo achieve an average FPS below 20?

A: This combo achieves an average FPS of 14 at 3840x2160 (4K) with Ultra settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combo’s capabilities across three resolutions and four settings presets. The data is measured, not estimated, and includes average FPS for all configurations, with min and max FPS only provided for Medium settings.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the results are as follows:

• Low: Average FPS is 76.
• Medium: Average FPS is 60, with a minimum of 51 and a maximum of 69.
• High: Average FPS is 54.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 35.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the results are:

• Low: Average FPS is 53.
• Medium: Average FPS is 41, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48.
• High: Average FPS is 38.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 24.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are:

• Low: Average FPS is 31.
• Medium: Average FPS is 25, with a minimum of 21 and a maximum of 28.
• High: Average FPS is 22.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 14.

The data shows a consistent scaling pattern. At 1080p, the combo can achieve playable frame rates at Low settings (76 FPS) and Medium settings (60 FPS). High settings at 1080p yield a borderline 54 FPS, while Ultra drops to 35 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The frame time data at 1080p Medium shows a range of 51 to 69 FPS, indicating noticeable variance during gameplay. Moving to 1440p, the average FPS drops by roughly 30% across all settings compared to 1080p. At 1440p, only Low settings (53 FPS) approach a playable level; Medium and High are sub-60 FPS, and Ultra falls to 24 FPS. At 4K, the combo is not viable for gaming, with all settings producing average FPS below 32. The Ultra preset at 4K is particularly poor, yielding an average of only 14 FPS. The min and max FPS data for Medium settings across all resolutions shows a consistent pattern of frame pacing issues, with the spread between min and max being roughly 17-18 FPS at each resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals the nature of the bottleneck in this system. When moving from 1080p Low (76 FPS) to 1440p Low (53 FPS), the FPS drops by 23 FPS, a 30% reduction. From 1440p Low to 4K Low (31 FPS), the FPS drops by another 22 FPS, a 41% reduction. For the Ultra preset, the drop is even more dramatic in percentage terms: from 1080p Ultra (35 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (24 FPS) is a 31% drop, and from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra (14 FPS) is a 42% drop.

This scaling pattern is characteristic of a system that is severely GPU-limited. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat as resolution increases, because the CPU workload would not change significantly. However, the data shows FPS decreasing consistently with resolution, which is a classic sign of the GPU being the limiting component. The GPU’s low processing power (6.144 TFLOPS FP32) and its system-shared memory architecture are the primary causes. As resolution increases, the number of pixels the GPU must render grows exponentially, and the Arc B370 simply does not have the fill rate or memory bandwidth to handle it. The pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s are low figures, and they are further hampered by the shared memory system, which introduces latency and bandwidth contention. The data suggests that even at 1080p, the GPU is working near its limit, and any increase in resolution or settings pushes it further into performance degradation. The difference in FPS between Low and Ultra settings at any given resolution (e.g., 76 vs 35 at 1080p) also confirms that the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rate, as these settings change the GPU’s workload directly.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and the user’s tolerance for frame rate fluctuations.

For 1080p, the only preset that consistently delivers an average FPS above 60 is Low, with an average of 76 FPS. The Medium preset averages exactly 60 FPS, but the min FPS of 51 suggests that there will be dips below 60 during intense scenes, which can cause stutter. High settings average 54 FPS, which is playable but not smooth for all users. Ultra settings at 1080p should be avoided, as the 35 FPS average will feel sluggish. The best experience at 1080p is likely the Medium preset, as it offers a balance of visual quality and performance, though users prioritizing smoothness over visuals should choose Low.

At 1440p, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset provides an average of 53 FPS, which is the only setting that approaches a playable level. Medium averages 41 FPS, with a min of 35, which is below the threshold for comfortable gameplay. High and Ultra at 1440p (38 and 24 FPS respectively) are not recommended for anything other than screenshots. For 1440p, the Low preset is the only viable choice for actual gameplay. At 4K, none of the presets are playable. The highest average FPS at 4K is 31 on Low, with Ultra dropping to 14 FPS. The data indicates that this combo should be used at 1080p for gaming, with the Low or Medium preset being the recommended choices. The High preset at 1080p (54 FPS) is a compromise, but the frame rate is not stable enough for a consistently smooth experience. The Ultra preset provides no playable experience at any resolution in this data set.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 2699 out of 2938 tested combos for Greedfall. This places it in the bottom 9% of all tested systems. The ranking reflects the severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU. While the Ryzen 5 9600X is a high-end processor (81st percentile in CPU benchmarks), the Intel Arc B370 is an entry-level integrated graphics solution (5th percentile in GPU benchmarks). The combo’s overall performance is effectively capped by the GPU’s capabilities. The data from the measured FPS shows that the system can handle the game at 1080p Low, but struggles at higher resolutions and settings. The low rank is consistent with the GPU’s low average benchmark score of 1184 and its proximity to rival parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770, which is a much older product. In contrast, the CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, are significantly more powerful, but this does not help the overall gaming performance because the GPU cannot utilize the CPU’s full potential. The benchmark results indicate that this combo is not suitable for demanding gaming, and its rank in this game’s database reflects that reality. The data shows that users seeking better performance in Greedfall would need a more capable GPU, as the CPU is not the limiting factor in this configuration.