Fortnite

Intel Core Ultra 5 235 pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 to deliver a versatile 1080p and 1440p Fortnite experience, with clear trade-offs at 4K. This combination ranks in the 54th percentile of tested combos, indicating a solid mid-pack performer that prioritizes high refresh rates over absolute visual fidelity at higher resolutions. The data shows a system capable of exceeding 240 FPS in esports settings at 1080p, but one that will require settings management to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This configuration provides the foundational throughput needed to handle Fortnite's game logic, physics, and the high object counts typical of Battle Royale matches. The processor's performance percentile of 89 places it well above the average CPU, suggesting it is rarely the primary bottleneck in this setup.

Benchmark data supports this interpretation. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and single-core score of 2085 indicate strong headroom for feeding the GPU with draw calls. In the context of Fortnite, which can be sensitive to single-thread performance for frame pacing, the 5.00 GHz boost clock is a key asset. The Passmark single-thread score of 4516 reinforces that the Ultra 5 235 has the per-core muscle to keep the frame pipeline full, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU can render frames faster than at higher settings.

The nearest rivals for this CPU show a tightly contested performance bracket. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 0.1% higher in average benchmarks, while the Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 0.1% lower. The AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303 trail by 0.2% each. These negligible deltas mean that in CPU-bound scenarios, the Core Ultra 5 235 will effectively perform on par with these alternatives. For Fortnite specifically, the measured FPS data confirms that even at 1080p Low settings, where CPU overhead is highest, the system achieves an average of 245 FPS, indicating the CPU is not holding back the RTX 4060.

The processor’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the game's data streaming requirements. The 14 cores are divided into performance and efficiency groups, allowing the OS to schedule background tasks away from the primary gaming threads. This architectural design helps maintain consistent frame times during intense combat scenes. The lack of a multiplier unlock means overclocking is not supported, so the stock 5.00 GHz boost is the performance ceiling. In practical terms, the data indicates this CPU is a capable partner for the RTX 4060, ensuring that the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates in most Fortnite scenarios.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the graphical workhorse here, featuring 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. Its boost clock is rated at 2460 MHz, with a base clock of 1830 MHz. The GPU's percentile rank of 61 is notably lower than the CPU's rank, marking it as the more limiting component in this pairing. This is a classic mid-range GPU profile, and the measured frame rates reflect that positioning.

In Fortnite, the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at most settings, but it becomes a potential constraint at 4K with higher detail levels. The passmark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 provide a general compute baseline, but the game-specific data is more illuminating. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% higher score) and AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.5% lower score), but these are integrated or workstation parts; the RTX 4060's dedicated 8 GB frame buffer and dedicated RT cores give it a distinct advantage in real-world gaming.

The measured FPS data shows the RTX 4060's performance envelope. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 30, which is below the threshold for comfortable play. The 4K Medium setting yields an average of 58 FPS, with a minimum of 49 FPS and a maximum of 67 FPS, showing that the GPU can handle 4K only with reduced settings. This aligns with the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface, which limit bandwidth and capacity for high-resolution textures. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for the game's rendering workload, but the memory subsystem is the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

At 1440p, the card performs much better. The High preset achieves an average of 85 FPS, while Medium reaches 110 FPS with a minimum of 93 FPS. The Low preset at 1440p hits 156 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 1080p results are where this GPU shines: Low settings produce an average of 245 FPS, Medium yields 173 FPS, and High achieves 134 FPS. These numbers indicate that the RTX 4060 is well-suited for competitive play at 1080p and 1440p, where the game is optimized for high frame rates rather than absolute visual quality.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo can achieve in Fortnite?

A: The highest measured average frame rate is 245 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset. This suggests the system is capable of driving very high refresh rates in competitive scenarios.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Fortnite?

A: Yes, but with significant compromises. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 30, which is playable but not smooth. Dropping to Medium settings improves the average to 58 FPS with a minimum of 49 FPS, making it a more viable option for 4K play.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235 is statistically tied with its nearest rivals. It scores 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900HX. The AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303 both trail by 0.2%.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?

A: The RTX 4060 ranks in the 61st percentile of all GPUs in the benchmark database. This is a solid mid-range position, indicating it outperforms the majority of graphics cards but is not at the high-end tier.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the combo exceed 144 FPS?

A: The system exceeds 144 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings (245 FPS) and at 2560x1440 with Low settings (156 FPS). It also comes close at 1080p Medium, which averages 173 FPS, and 1080p High, which averages 134 FPS.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values recorded for the Medium settings at different resolutions?

A: The measured minimum FPS values for Medium settings are 147 FPS at 1920x1080, 93 FPS at 2560x1440, and 49 FPS at 3840x2160. These figures provide a floor for frame rate consistency at this preset.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific configuration of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1995th out of 3700 tested combos in Fortnite. This places it in the 54th percentile of all combinations, meaning it outperforms roughly 54% of the tested systems. This ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's mid-range positioning; the CPU is a high-performer (89th percentile), but the GPU's 61st percentile pulls the overall combo down.

The rank indicates that this is a mainstream gaming setup, not a top-tier one. For context, the top 1000 combos likely feature higher-end GPUs like the RTX 4080 or 4090, which would deliver significantly higher frames at 4K. However, this combo's 1080p and 1440p performance is strong, as evidenced by the measured FPS. The rank of 1995 suggests that users with this setup will have a good experience at standard resolutions but will not be at the current-generation for 4K gaming or maxed-out settings.

The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this ranking. If paired with a more powerful GPU, the Core Ultra 5 235 could likely push this combo into a higher percentile. Conversely, the RTX 4060 is the bottleneck, as its performance is capped by its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus. The 54th percentile ranking is a fair assessment of the system's overall capabilities, reflecting a balance between a strong processor and a capable but not exceptional graphics card.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For competitive play at 1920x1080, the Low preset provides the highest average FPS at 245, which is ideal for a 240 Hz monitor. The Medium preset at 1080p still delivers an excellent 173 FPS average, with a minimum of 147 FPS, offering a good balance between visual quality and frame rate. High at 1080p drops to 134 FPS, which is still playable but less ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 156 FPS, making it suitable for 144 Hz panels. The Medium preset at 1440p yields 110 FPS with a minimum of 93 FPS, which is a strong choice for a smooth 100+ FPS experience with better visuals. High at 1440p averages 85 FPS, which is acceptable for 60 Hz or 75 Hz monitors but may feel less responsive on faster displays. The Ultra preset at both 1080p (88 FPS) and 1440p (56 FPS) provides the best image quality but requires a compromise on frame rate.

For 3840x2160, the data suggests that the Medium preset is the practical choice, delivering 58 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset at 4K achieves 82 FPS, which is surprisingly good and may be preferable for smoother gameplay. High at 4K drops to 45 FPS, and Ultra falls to 30 FPS, both of which are below the smoothness threshold for most gamers. The recommendation is to prioritize the Low or Medium presets at 4K to maintain playable frame rates.

The best overall experience for most users is likely the Medium preset, as it provides a balanced combination of visual fidelity and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p, it offers 173 FPS; at 1440p, it offers 110 FPS; and at 4K, it offers 58 FPS. This preset ensures a playable experience at all resolutions, with the caveat that 4K will be just above 60 FPS. For those with high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors, the Low preset is the clear winner for maximizing frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured performance data for this combo reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the system is heavily GPU-bound. The Ultra preset produces an average of 30 FPS, which is the lowest recorded figure for this combo. High settings at 4K yield an average of 45 FPS. The Medium preset improves this to an average of 58 FPS, with a minimum of 49 FPS and a maximum of 67 FPS. The Low preset at 4K delivers an average of 82 FPS, showing a significant jump in performance when visual effects are reduced.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates become more competitive with standard refresh rates. The Ultra preset averages 56 FPS, which is still below 60 FPS. High settings at 1440p produce an average of 85 FPS, offering a smooth experience on 60 Hz displays. The Medium preset reaches an average of 110 FPS, with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS, making it suitable for 100 Hz+ monitors. The Low preset at 1440p achieves an average of 156 FPS, which is excellent for 144 Hz panels.

At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates its peak performance. The Ultra preset averages 88 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. High settings at 1080p deliver an average of 134 FPS, providing a solid high-refresh-rate experience. The Medium preset reaches an average of 173 FPS, with a minimum of 147 FPS and a maximum of 198 FPS, which is excellent for 165 Hz monitors. The Low preset at 1080p produces an average of 245 FPS, which is the highest recorded frame rate and is ideal for 240 Hz displays.

The data shows a consistent pattern: lowering settings provides a more substantial FPS increase than lowering resolution. For example, switching from Ultra to Low at 1080p increases the average FPS from 88 to 245, a gain of 157 FPS. At 4K, the same settings change yields an increase from 30 to 82 FPS, a gain of 52 FPS. This indicates that the GPU's rendering load is the primary factor, and reducing graphical effects has a more significant impact on performance than dropping resolution. The minimum FPS values are only recorded for the Medium preset, which shows the frame rate consistency at this setting: 147 FPS at 1080p, 93 FPS at 1440p, and 49 FPS at 4K.