Evolve

The Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB pairing delivers a highly capable Evolve experience, with benchmark results showing that the combination ranks 1096th out of 2872 tested combos, placing it in the upper portion of the database. The measured frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets reveal a system that can comfortably handle 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K remains playable with adjustments. This analysis uses only the provided data to interpret how the CPU and GPU characteristics influence Evolve’s performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combination for Evolve?

A: The combo ranks 1096th out of 2872 tested combos, which places it in the 38th percentile of all tested configurations. This indicates that while it is not a top-tier setup, it outperforms the majority of tested combinations for this game.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 4901, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. The AMD FirePro W5130M scores 4904 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 scores 4893 (0.2% lower), the AMD Radeon R7 M265 scores 4929 (0.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon R7 M360 scores 4931 (0.6% higher). The RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB sits squarely within this narrow performance band.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1920x1080 with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the measured average FPS is 170, with a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 195 FPS. This provides a smooth experience well above standard 60 Hz refresh rates and even supports high-refresh monitors.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combo?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 35 on Ultra to 84 on Low settings. Medium settings yield 65 FPS on average, which is playable, while High settings produce 51 FPS. Ultra at 35 FPS may be less desirable for fast-paced gameplay.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K scores 1136 in 3DMark single-thread and 12412 in 3DMark max-threads, showing strong scaling across cores. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 2116 while the multi-core score is 30745, indicating the CPU is roughly 14.5 times faster in multi-core workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB achieves a rank of 1096 out of 2872 tested combos for Evolve. This places the setup in the 62nd percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly 62% of the combinations in the database. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU’s strong multi-threading capabilities complement the GPU’s mid-range performance profile.

The CPU itself holds an 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46881. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 with an average score of 46971 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at 47022 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX at 46654 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 at 46653 (0.5% lower). These margins are all within half a percent, positioning the i7-13700K as essentially performance-equivalent to this cluster of processors.

The GPU, by contrast, holds a 29th percentile ranking among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 4901. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.6% of this score, including the AMD FirePro W5130M, NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450, AMD Radeon R7 M265, and AMD Radeon R7 M360. This suggests that in synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB performs at a level comparable to much older or lower-tier graphics cards, though the measured FPS in Evolve tells a different story.

The divergence between the GPU’s low percentile ranking and the combo’s solid mid-tier position indicates that Evolve is not particularly GPU-bound at lower resolutions. The CPU’s high percentile ranking likely carries more weight in the overall combo performance, especially at 1080p and 1440p where the i7-13700K can feed frames efficiently. The data shows that the combo rank of 1096 is a meaningful improvement over what the GPU’s percentile alone would suggest.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, Medium settings provide the most consistent experience across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers an average of 170 FPS with a minimum of 144 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense firefights. At 2560x1440, Medium maintains 114 FPS on average with a minimum of 97 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for most displays. Even at 3840x2160, Medium achieves 65 FPS on average with a minimum of 55 FPS, making it the only preset besides Low that remains playable at 4K.

High settings offer a modest visual upgrade but require a significant frame rate sacrifice. At 1080p, High drops to 133 FPS average, which is still excellent, but at 1440p it falls to 89 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 51 FPS. For players with high-refresh monitors at 1080p, High is viable, but for 1440p or higher, Medium is the safer choice.

Ultra settings are only recommended for players who prioritize image quality over frame rate. At 1080p, Ultra yields 92 FPS average, which is playable, but at 1440p it drops to 62 FPS, and at 4K it falls to 35 FPS. The minimum FPS data is not available for Ultra presets, but the averages suggest that 4K Ultra would struggle to maintain consistent performance.

Low settings provide the highest frame rates, with 219 FPS at 1080p, 147 FPS at 1440p, and 84 FPS at 4K. This preset is ideal for competitive play where maximum frame rates are desired, but the visual downgrade may be noticeable. Given that Medium offers nearly the same performance at 1080p and 1440p with better visuals, Medium is the recommended preset for most players.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB delivers an average of 219 FPS on Low, 170 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 144 and maximum of 195), 133 FPS on High, and 92 FPS on Ultra. This resolution shows the GPU’s ability to handle Evolve well above the 60 FPS standard, with even Ultra settings maintaining a playable frame rate.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 147 on Low, 114 on Medium (minimum 97, maximum 131), 89 on High, and 62 on Ultra. The Medium preset remains the sweet spot, providing a 97 FPS minimum that keeps gameplay fluid. High settings at 1440p still offer a good experience, but the drop from 114 to 89 FPS represents a 22% performance loss for the visual upgrade.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits become apparent. Low settings produce an average of 84 FPS, which is respectable for 4K, but Medium drops to 65 FPS (minimum 55, maximum 74), High falls to 51 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 35 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 19 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 14 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 16 FPS. This shows that each successive quality tier at 4K requires a substantial frame rate trade-off.

The minimum FPS data, available only for Medium settings, shows that the combo maintains stability even at 4K. The 55 FPS minimum at 3840x2160 Medium suggests that frame pacing remains consistent, avoiding sudden stutters during action sequences. At 1080p Medium, the 144 FPS minimum indicates the system rarely drops below high refresh rates.

Comparing resolution scaling, the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB shows a 22.4% performance drop from 1080p to 1440p on Medium (170 to 114 FPS), and a 43% drop from 1440p to 4K (114 to 65 FPS). This scaling is typical for a mid-range GPU, with the 4K resolution placing significant strain on the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB frame buffer.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a GB206 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU contains 21,900 million transistors on a die size of 181 mm², giving it a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². It features 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation pipelines, along with 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores.

Clock speeds are relatively modest, with a base clock of 2407 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz. The memory operates at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s across the 128-bit bus. The 8 GB GDDR7 frame buffer is the primary limitation for Evolve at higher resolutions, as the game’s texture requirements can strain this capacity.

The GPU’s FP32 performance of 23.70 TFLOPS and texture rate of 370.4 GTexel/s indicate solid compute capabilities. The pixel rate of 123.5 GPixel/s helps with fill-rate-heavy scenes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering techniques.

In Evolve, the GPU’s role is most evident at 4K resolution, where the average FPS drops from 84 on Low to 35 on Ultra. The 128-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become bottlenecks when pushing high-resolution textures, as evidenced by the significant performance gaps between presets. At 1080p, the GPU has ample headroom, with even Ultra settings maintaining 92 FPS average, but the scaling to 1440p and 4K shows diminishing returns.

The GPU’s percentile ranking of 29th among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 4901, seems low relative to its Evolve performance. This discrepancy suggests that Evolve’s engine is well-optimized for the GPU’s architecture, or that the synthetic benchmarks do not fully capture the GPU’s strengths in this specific game. The nearest rivals, such as the AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450, all score within 0.6% of the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB, yet the measured FPS in Evolve shows the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB performing at a level that these older cards could not match.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU’s benchmark scores show strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multi-core score of 30745 and a single-core score of 2116. The Geekbench multi-core score is 19429, while the single-core score is 2529. The PassMark multithread score is 45887, with a single-thread score of 4333. These results place the CPU in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46881.

The nearest CPU rivals are all within 0.5% of the i7-13700K’s average score. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 46653 (0.5% lower). This tight clustering indicates that the i7-13700K is performance-equivalent to these competing processors for general workloads.

In Evolve, the CPU’s role is most pronounced at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo achieves 219 FPS, suggesting the CPU is capable of feeding frames well above typical display refresh rates. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2262 and 4-thread score of 4469 indicate strong single-and dual-core performance, which is relevant for games that rely on a few primary threads.

The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for Evolve’s background tasks and any additional software running concurrently. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with data locality, reducing memory latency in scenarios where the game engine accesses large datasets. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures high single-thread performance, which is beneficial for the game’s main simulation thread.

However, the CPU’s impact on Evolve’s frame rates appears secondary to the GPU’s limitations, especially at 4K. The performance drop from 1080p to 4K on Medium settings (170 to 65 FPS) is primarily driven by the GPU’s memory bandwidth and fill rate constraints rather than CPU processing power. The CPU’s high percentile ranking and benchmark scores suggest it is not the bottleneck in this configuration, even at the highest resolutions.