Evolve

Evolve, a 2015 FPS title, places unique demands on modern hardware, and the combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB produces a distinctive performance profile. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly capable at mainstream resolutions but reveals a clear GPU-bound ceiling as resolution scales toward 4K. This analysis walks through the measured FPS data, ranking context, and component roles to provide a methodical breakdown of what this pairing delivers.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Evolve demonstrates a classic performance curve where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 219 FPS average, which drops to 147 FPS at 2560x1440 and further to 84 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 61.6% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the rendering pipeline scales heavily with pixel count.

When examining High settings, the scaling pattern becomes more pronounced. The average FPS at 1080p High is 133, dropping to 89 FPS at 1440p and 51 FPS at 4K. The 4K result is only 38.3% of the 1080p figure, showing that the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB’s memory bandwidth and pixel throughput are taxed severely at ultra-high resolutions. The pixel rate of 123.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 370.4 GTexel/s are sufficient for 1080p but become limiting factors as the resolution climbs.

The Medium settings row provides the only complete FPS data with min and max values. At 1080p Medium, the average is 170 FPS with a minimum of 144 and maximum of 195. At 1440p Medium, these figures shift to 114 average, 97 minimum, and 131 maximum. The 4K Medium row shows 65 average, 55 minimum, and 74 maximum. The spread between minimum and maximum FPS widens slightly at higher resolutions, suggesting increased frame time variance under heavier load.

Ultra settings reveal the steepest performance cliff. The average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 92, falling to 62 at 1440p and 35 at 4K. The 4K Ultra figure represents only 38.0% of the 1080p Ultra performance, confirming that this setting preset combined with 4K pushes the GPU well beyond its comfortable envelope. The data indicates that the limiting component at 1080p and 1440p is primarily the GPU, while the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.40 GHz boost clock provide adequate headroom for the game’s logic and physics processing.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this combo in Evolve?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 219, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This demonstrates the system’s capability to drive very high frame rates when graphical demands are minimized.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: The 4K Ultra preset yields an average FPS of 35, which is the lowest measured performance point in the dataset. This indicates that Ultra settings at 4K are not playable for smooth gameplay, as the frame rate falls below typical 60 FPS targets.

Q: What is the frame time consistency like at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo delivers an average FPS of 114, with a minimum of 97 and maximum of 131. This narrow range of 34 FPS between minimum and maximum suggests relatively stable frame pacing, making this a viable configuration for consistent performance.

Q: Is there a significant performance gap between Medium and High settings at 1080p?

A: Yes, the data shows a 28.0% difference. Medium settings produce 170 FPS average, while High settings yield 133 FPS. This gap indicates that the High preset introduces substantial additional rendering work compared to Medium.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19039, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, scores 19047 with a deltaPct of 0, indicating near-identical overall performance. The Intel Core 3 201E scores 19056 with a deltaPct of -0.1, showing the i5-12400F is 0.1% slower in this comparison.

Q: What does the GPU’s percentile ranking indicate about its overall performance?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB sits at the 29th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 4901. This places it below the majority of tested graphics cards, though its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5130M (score 4904, deltaPct -0.1) and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 (score 4893, deltaPct 0.2), showing the RTX 5060 Ti outperforms the latter by 0.2%.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F belongs to the Core 12th Gen series, built on the Alder Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. This configuration provides solid multi-threaded capability for Evolve’s simulation and AI workloads, though the game’s age means it likely relies more heavily on single-thread performance.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12380, while the single-core score is 1680. The Geekbench multicore result is 9472 with a single-core score of 1964. In the Passmark suite, the multithread score is 19433, and the single-thread score is 3481. These numbers indicate a balanced performer that can handle both lightly-threaded game logic and more demanding background tasks without bottlenecking the GPU.

The CPU’s 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19039, places it in the upper-middle tier of processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, matches its average score at 19047 with a 0% deltaPct, while the Intel Core 3 201E is 0.1% slower. The Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X both score 18982 and 18979 respectively, each with deltaPct values of 0.3%, meaning the i5-12400F outperforms them by 0.3%.

In the context of Evolve’s measured FPS, the CPU’s role becomes evident when examining the scaling from 1440p to 4K. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 147 at 1440p to 84 at 4K, a 42.9% reduction. This steep decline suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor at both resolutions, as the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed frames. The 4.40 GHz boost clock ensures that the game’s main thread can execute efficiently, while the 12 threads handle secondary tasks like physics and audio processing.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB achieves a combo rank of 1096 out of 2872 tested combinations in Evolve. This places it in the top 38.2% of all tested combos, indicating that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it performs respectably for the hardware involved. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU’s strong mid-range performance and the GPU’s relatively lower percentile position.

The CPU’s 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 29th percentile ranking. This disparity suggests that the combo’s overall rank is dragged down by the graphics card, which is positioned in the bottom third of all tested GPUs. The CPU is capable of driving higher frame rates, but the GPU’s rendering throughput becomes the ceiling in many scenarios.

Looking at the measured FPS data, the combo’s rank is justified by its ability to exceed 60 FPS at 1440p with Medium and High settings, and at 1080p with all presets except Ultra. The 4K results, particularly at Ultra (35 FPS) and High (51 FPS), fall below the 60 FPS threshold, limiting the combo’s appeal for high-resolution gaming. The rank of 1096 out of 2872 suggests that many other combos achieve better 4K performance, likely due to GPUs with higher memory bandwidth or more shading units.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores highlight its positioning. The AMD FirePro W5130M scores 4904 with a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the RTX 5060 Ti is 0.1% slower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 scores 4893 with a deltaPct of 0.2%, showing the RTX 5060 Ti is 0.2% faster. These comparisons place the RTX 5060 Ti in a narrow performance band, though its 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a modern feature set that older rivals lack.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive picture of performance. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 219 FPS at Low, 170 FPS at Medium, 133 FPS at High, and 92 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset includes min and max values of 144 and 195, respectively, showing a 51 FPS range. This indicates that even at 1080p, frame rates can vary significantly during intense scenes, though the average remains well above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably. Low settings yield 147 FPS, Medium produces 114 FPS with a min of 97 and max of 131, High reaches 89 FPS, and Ultra falls to 62 FPS. The Medium preset’s 34 FPS range between min and max is tighter than at 1080p, suggesting more consistent frame pacing at this resolution. The Ultra result of 62 FPS is just above the 60 FPS threshold, making it playable but with little headroom for demanding scenes.

The 3840x2160 results show significant degradation. Low settings produce 84 FPS, Medium yields 65 FPS with a min of 55 and max of 74, High drops to 51 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35 FPS. The Medium preset’s min of 55 FPS indicates that even this setting can dip below 60 FPS during heavy action, while the Ultra preset’s 35 FPS average is well below playability standards for most users. The gap between Low (84 FPS) and Ultra (35 FPS) at 4K is 58.3%, highlighting the GPU’s struggle with higher-quality rendering at this resolution.

Comparing across resolutions, the scaling factor varies by preset. At Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces FPS by 32.9% (219 to 147), and from 1440p to 4K reduces it by 42.9% (147 to 84). At High settings, the reductions are 33.1% (133 to 89) and 42.7% (89 to 51), respectively. This consistent pattern suggests that the GPU’s shading units and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints, as the CPU has sufficient capacity to maintain frame delivery.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and frame rate priorities. For 1080p gaming, High settings at 133 FPS average provide a strong balance between visual quality and performance, staying well above the 60 FPS threshold with room for high-refresh-rate displays. Ultra settings at 92 FPS also remain playable, but the 30.8% performance hit compared to High may not justify the visual gains for competitive play.

At 1440p, Medium settings at 114 FPS average offer the best experience, with a minimum of 97 FPS ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense moments. High settings at 89 FPS are also viable, but the 21.9% reduction from Medium could cause noticeable dips in demanding scenes. Ultra settings at 62 FPS are borderline, with the average just above 60 FPS but likely to drop below during heavy action.

For 4K gaming, the data shows that only Low settings at 84 FPS provide a consistently smooth experience above 60 FPS. Medium settings at 65 FPS average with a 55 FPS minimum risk visible stuttering, while High (51 FPS) and Ultra (35 FPS) fall below playability standards. Users targeting 4K should either accept Low settings for stable performance or consider lowering resolution to 1440p for better visual quality at higher frame rates.

The Medium preset offers the most consistent frame pacing across all resolutions, as evidenced by the min and max values. At 1080p, the 144-195 range provides a 51 FPS spread, while at 1440p the 97-131 range tightens to 34 FPS, and at 4K the 55-74 range narrows further to 19 FPS. This consistency makes Medium a reliable choice for users who prioritize smoothness over absolute visual fidelity.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, featuring 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 2407 MHz and boost clock of 2572 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical factor for Evolve’s texture-heavy scenes.

The GPU’s compute capabilities include 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. Its FP32 performance is 23.70 TFLOPS, and the pixel rate is 123.5 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 370.4 GTexel/s. These specifications translate to strong raw performance, but the 8 GB memory capacity becomes a limiting factor at 4K where Evolve’s textures and effects consume significant VRAM.

Benchmark results place the RTX 5060 Ti at the 29th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 4901. This positioning is notably lower than the CPU’s 73rd percentile, creating an imbalance in the combo. The Passmark G3D score of 21981 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019 indicate moderate DirectX 12 performance, though Evolve’s 2015 release date means it likely relies on older APIs where the GPU’s modern architecture may not be fully utilized.

The GPU’s nearest rivals illustrate its benchmark standing. The AMD FirePro W5130M scores 4904 with a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the RTX 5060 Ti is marginally slower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 scores 4893 with a deltaPct of 0.2%, showing the RTX 5060 Ti edges it out. These comparisons suggest that in synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5060 Ti performs similarly to much older or lower-tier GPUs, though its real-world gaming performance in Evolve is bolstered by its modern feature set and memory bandwidth.

In Evolve, the GPU’s role is clearly dominant in determining frame rates. The measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a consistent reduction that aligns with the GPU’s pixel and texture throughput limits. At 1080p Low, the 219 FPS figure indicates the GPU is not fully saturated, allowing the CPU to keep pace. However, at 4K Ultra with 35 FPS, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the CPU’s 4.40 GHz boost clock and 12 threads provide ample processing power for the game’s logic.