Evolve

Evolve

AVERAGE FPS
97
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 97 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 46 61 78
1440p QHD 60 83 105 134
1080p Full HD 83 123 158 199

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 78
3840x2160 Medium 61
3840x2160 High 46
3840x2160 Ultra 34
2560x1440 Low 134
2560x1440 Medium 105
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Ultra 60
1920x1080 Low 199
1920x1080 Medium 158
1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Ultra 83

Evolve with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination delivers a robust, high-refresh-rate experience in Evolve, but its performance ceiling is firmly dictated by the GPU at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows a pairing where the CPU’s massive cache and strong multi-threading provide ample headroom, while the graphics card becomes the primary bottleneck as visual load increases. This combo ranks in the 823rd position out of 1695 tested combinations, placing it in the upper half of all systems, yet the FPS figures reveal a clear tiering between playable high-speed and demanding ultra settings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is built on the Zen 4 architecture (codename Raphael) and features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This processor is equipped with a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a key asset for gaming workloads that benefit from high-speed data access. The 3DMark scores indicate strong scaling, with a 16-thread score of 7980 and a single-thread score of 959, suggesting that the CPU can handle both heavily threaded and latency-sensitive tasks effectively.

In the context of Evolve, which is an FPS title from 2015, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with frame data and manage game logic. The benchmark results show that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 199.2 FPS, which is a high figure that suggests the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution and setting. The multi-core performance, as evidenced by Cinebench R23’s multicore score of 29149 and Geekbench multicore score of 15101, ensures that background tasks and complex scene calculations do not cause frame hitches. The CPU’s percentile rank of 87 versus all CPUs confirms it is a top-tier performer, with nearest rival Intel Core i7-12700F being only 0.1% ahead in average benchmark score, effectively a statistical tie.

The 7800X3D’s architecture also supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for feeding the GPU at high frame rates. However, the data does not show a scenario where the CPU becomes the bottleneck; instead, the FPS drops are more pronounced when increasing resolution or settings, which points to the GPU as the limiting component. For Evolve, the CPU provides a stable foundation, ensuring that even at 1080p with high settings, the system maintains 123.4 FPS, leaving performance on the table only when the GPU is pushed to its limits.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific pairing of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and RX 6750 XT achieves a combo rank of 823 out of 1695 tested combinations in Evolve. This places the system in the 51st percentile of all tested combos, meaning it outperforms slightly more than half of the configurations in the database. The rank reflects a balance between the CPU’s high processing power and the GPU’s mid-range to upper-mid-range performance, resulting in a system that is capable but not at the absolute top tier for this title.

Comparing the components to their nearest rivals provides context. The CPU is nearly identical in average benchmark score to the Intel Core i7-12700F (deltaPct of 0.1%), indicating that either processor would yield similar results in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU, however, shows a more varied competitive landscape. The RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 35327, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at a 0.2% difference, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile at -0.3%, meaning the RX 6750 XT is slightly ahead of the latter. This tight grouping suggests that the GPU’s performance is competitive with several other options, but the combo rank is ultimately determined by how these parts interact with Evolve’s specific engine requirements.

The rank of 823 is not exceptional, but it is solid, given that the GPU is not a flagship part. The data implies that users with this combo will experience smooth gameplay at most settings, but they will not achieve the highest frame rates possible in the database. The combination’s strength lies in its balance, offering a strong 1080p experience and a capable 1440p experience, rather than pushing extreme 4K performance.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound performance scaling. At 1080p Low, the system hits 199.2 FPS, which drops to 133.7 FPS at 1440p Low, and further to 77.5 FPS at 4K Low. This represents a 33% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 42% drop from 1440p to 4K. This steep decline indicates that the RX 6750 XT is struggling to fill the increasing pixel count, while the CPU maintains its ability to feed frames.

The scaling becomes even more pronounced at higher settings. For High settings, the FPS drops from 123.4 at 1080p to 83.1 at 1440p (a 33% reduction) and then to 46 at 4K (a 45% reduction from 1440p). At Ultra settings, the drop is from 82.8 at 1080p to 59.9 at 1440p (a 28% reduction) and then to 33.9 at 4K (a 43% reduction). This consistent pattern, where the percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is larger than from 1080p to 1440p, is a classic sign of a GPU that is hitting its memory bandwidth or shading unit limits.

The data strongly suggests that the RX 6750 XT is the limiting component at resolutions above 1080p. The CPU’s performance, as indicated by its high benchmark scores, is sufficient to push well over 200 FPS in less demanding scenarios, but the GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are unable to sustain high frame rates at 4K. The fact that the FPS at 4K High (46) is less than half of the 1080p High (123.4) underscores this bottleneck. For users targeting 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the primary factor determining playability, while the CPU ensures that frame pacing remains consistent.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system’s performance across all combinations of resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from a high of 199.2 at Low settings to 82.8 at Ultra settings. The Medium setting yields 157.8 FPS, and High produces 123.4 FPS. These numbers show a clear hierarchy, with each step up in settings costing a significant number of frames. The gap between Low and Ultra is 116.4 FPS, which is substantial and indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed by the graphical features enabled at Ultra.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS figures are 133.7 for Low, 104.9 for Medium, 83.1 for High, and 59.9 for Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, with the Low setting losing 65.5 FPS and Ultra losing 22.9 FPS. At this resolution, the system remains playable at all settings, with even Ultra maintaining a decent 59.9 FPS, but the headroom for high refresh rate monitors is reduced. The 1440p High setting, at 83.1 FPS, is a good target for a 144Hz display, though it will not fully saturate it.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a notable hit. The average FPS is 77.5 for Low, 61 for Medium, 46 for High, and 33.9 for Ultra. The 4K Ultra setting is the only configuration that falls below 40 FPS, making it less than ideal for smooth gameplay. The 4K Low setting, at 77.5 FPS, is the most viable option for 4K gaming, but it still requires significant graphical compromises. The data shows that the system is most comfortable at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K being a stretch that demands lower settings to maintain playability.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain over 100 FPS?

A: At 1920x1080, the system achieves over 100 FPS at Low (199.2), Medium (157.8), and High (123.4) settings. At 2560x1440, it only exceeds 100 FPS at Low (133.7) and Medium (104.9) settings.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 959 in 3DMark single-thread and 7980 in 3DMark 16-threads, indicating strong scaling. In Cinebench R23, it scores 4115 single-core and 29149 multi-core, showing a multi-thread advantage of roughly 7 times.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the primary bottleneck at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 33.9, which is a 59% drop from 1080p Ultra (82.8 FPS). This large drop, combined with the CPU’s high benchmark scores, indicates the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What is the FPS difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High setting produces 83.1 FPS, while Ultra produces 59.9 FPS. This represents a 23.2 FPS reduction when moving from High to Ultra.

Q: How does this GPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 35327, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (35264) and 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (35435, meaning the RX 6750 XT is lower).

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D has a launch MSRP of $449.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For the best overall experience, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the recommended choice. The data shows this setting provides 104.9 FPS, which is comfortably above 60 FPS and offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. This is a significant improvement over High settings, which drop to 83.1 FPS, and it remains smooth on standard 60Hz monitors while also being viable for 144Hz displays with some margin. The Medium preset at 1080p, yielding 157.8 FPS, is also an excellent option for users with high refresh rate monitors, but the 1440p Medium setting provides a sharper image with only a 52.9 FPS penalty.

For users prioritizing maximum visual quality, the High preset at 1080p is the sweet spot. It delivers 123.4 FPS, which is still very fast and offers a noticeable visual upgrade over Medium. Ultra settings at 1080p drop to 82.8 FPS, which is still playable but not ideal for competitive play. At 1440p, High is the most demanding setting that remains above 60 FPS, at 83.1 FPS, making it a solid choice for those who prefer higher resolutions. For 4K gaming, the Low preset at 77.5 FPS is the only setting that provides a consistently smooth experience, as Medium drops to 61 FPS and High to 46 FPS. The data suggests avoiding Ultra settings at any resolution above 1080p, as the performance hit is substantial.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 2150 MHz, a boost clock of 2600 MHz, and a game clock of 2495 MHz. It also includes 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs, which are key for pixel processing. These specifications are directly reflected in the game’s performance, particularly at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth and pixel fill rate become critical.

The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for Evolve at all tested settings, as the game is from 2015 and does not require excessive memory. However, the GPU’s raw compute power, measured at 13.31 TFLOPS FP32, is what limits performance at 4K. The pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s are modest for 4K, explaining the steep FPS drops. The GPU’s benchmark scores show it is competitive, with a percentile rank of 79 versus all GPUs, and its average score of 35327 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 5600M.

The GPU’s performance at 1080p is strong, with the Low setting hitting 199.2 FPS, but the data shows that the RX 6750 XT is not designed for high-refresh 4K gaming. The memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and the 192-bit bus provide adequate bandwidth for 1440p, but the 4K results indicate a bottleneck. The GPU’s TDP of 250 W and suggested PSU of 600 W are specifications that do not affect in-game FPS but are relevant for system builders. Overall, the RX 6750 XT is capable of delivering a great 1080p and good 1440p experience, but it is the component that holds the combo back from achieving top-tier rankings in Evolve at higher resolutions.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4200 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2600 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Evolve

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 77.5
3840x2160 Medium 61.0
3840x2160 High 46.0
3840x2160 Ultra 33.9
2560x1440 Low 133.7
2560x1440 Medium 104.9
2560x1440 High 83.1
2560x1440 Ultra 59.9
1920x1080 Low 199.2
1920x1080 Medium 157.8
1920x1080 High 123.4
1920x1080 Ultra 82.8

Evolve with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Other GPUs

See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Evolve with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs

See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + RX 6750 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.