Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
147
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 147 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 85 105 126
1440p QHD 84 135 166 199
1080p Full HD 116 186 229 282

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 126
3840x2160 Medium 105
3840x2160 High 85
3840x2160 Ultra 54
2560x1440 Low 199
2560x1440 Medium 166
2560x1440 High 135
2560x1440 Ultra 84
1920x1080 Low 282
1920x1080 Medium 229
1920x1080 High 186
1920x1080 Ultra 116

Downfall with Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Downfall, but the data reveals distinct bottlenecks depending on where you set the resolution and quality dials. This is a classic case where the CPU’s headroom is more than sufficient, leaving the GPU to dictate the frame rate at higher loads. Here is how the measured numbers break down.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling from 1080p to 4K exposes a clear shift in system pressure. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 282.1 FPS, which is an exceptionally high ceiling that indicates the CPU is feeding the GPU without issue. When you move to 2560x1440 on Low, the average drops to 198.8 FPS, a 29.5% reduction that shows the GPU beginning to take on more work. At 3840x2160 on Low, the average falls to 125.9 FPS, which is a 55.4% drop from the 1080p figure—a substantial decline that points squarely at the GPU as the limiting factor.

The pattern holds at higher settings, though the percentages tighten. With High settings, the FPS goes from 185.5 at 1080p to 134.6 at 1440p (a 27.4% loss) and then to 84.7 at 4K (a 54.3% loss from 1080p). This consistency suggests that the RX 7800 XT’s rendering throughput is the primary constraint once the resolution climbs, while the i7-14700K’s 20 cores and 28 threads remain largely idle. The delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is stark: 125.9 FPS versus 53.6 FPS, a 57.4% gap that demonstrates how dramatically the GPU’s workload expands with quality presets. Benchmark results indicate that 1080p is entirely CPU-unconstrained, while 4K is purely GPU-bound.

How This Combo Ranks

Looking at the broader picture, this specific pairing lands at rank 629 out of 1741 tested combos in Downfall. That places it in the upper-middle tier of the database, which is a reasonable outcome for hardware that is not at the absolute flagship level. The i7-14700K itself sits in the 96th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70074. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF, scores 70104 with a deltaPct of 0—meaning the two are effectively identical in synthetic tests. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is only 0.5% ahead, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 1.4% behind, so the CPU is comfortably competitive.

The GPU, however, is less dominant in its own percentile. The RX 7800 XT ranks in the 76th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 32619. Its nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 (0.2% ahead), the NVIDIA P104-100 (0.4% behind), and the NVIDIA T600 Mobile (0.7% behind). This suggests the GPU is a solid mid-to-high performer, but it is not in the same league as the CPU in relative terms. The combo rank of 629 out of 1741 reflects this balance: the CPU carries the team in synthetic benchmarks, but the in-game FPS is ultimately capped by the GPU’s capabilities, especially at higher resolutions.

GPU Role

The RX 7800 XT brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial amount of VRAM for a horror title like Downfall, which is unlikely to be constrained by memory capacity at any of the measured settings. The GPU’s clock behavior is more telling: its game clock is rated at 2124 MHz, with a boost clock of 2430 MHz, and the measured FPS suggests that the card sustains near-boost frequencies under load. The 5 nm process from TSMC and RDNA 3.0 architecture deliver a peak FP32 throughput of 37.32 TFLOPS, which is ample for this game’s visual demands.

What the data shows is that the GPU’s role shifts from being a high-refresh enabler at 1080p to a bottleneck at 4K. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the combo manages 116.2 FPS, which is still smooth for most displays, but at 4K Ultra, the average collapses to 53.6 FPS—a figure that is barely playable for a genre where reaction time matters. The 16 GB VRAM is never the problem; the raw rasterization power is. The pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s are strong on paper, but the measured results confirm that the card’s 96 ROPs are working hard at 4K, where the fill rate requirement grows exponentially.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience per the measured rows, Medium settings at 2560x1440 offer the most balanced trade-off. The average FPS of 165.6 at 1440p Medium is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and it is 96% higher than the 4K Ultra result. If you prefer 1080p, High settings at 185.5 FPS are excellent, but the jump to Medium at 228.9 FPS provides a 23.4% improvement with only a modest visual downgrade that is unlikely to be noticeable in a dark, atmospheric horror game.

For those with a 4K display, the recommendation is to stick with Low settings, which yield 125.9 FPS—more than double the 4K Ultra figure. The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is 21.1 FPS (104.8 versus 125.9), but Low still offers a comfortable margin over the 60 FPS target. Avoid Ultra at 4K entirely, as the 53.6 FPS average will cause perceptible stutter in fast-moving scenes. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 84.4 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a game that may require quick camera turns. The data suggests that Medium is the sweet spot across all resolutions, balancing visual fidelity with performance headroom.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces a wide spread across settings: Low hits 282.1 FPS, Medium reaches 228.9 FPS, High delivers 185.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 116.2 FPS. The gap from Low to Ultra is 165.9 FPS, which is a 58.8% reduction—a clear indication that the GPU is heavily taxed by the Ultra preset even at the lowest resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers compress: Low averages 198.8 FPS, Medium 165.6 FPS, High 134.6 FPS, and Ultra 84.4 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra here is 114.4 FPS, or 57.5%, showing that the resolution increase amplifies the GPU load. At 3840x2160, the frame rates become the lowest in the set: Low averages 125.9 FPS, Medium 104.8 FPS, High 84.7 FPS, and Ultra 53.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only measured row that falls below 60 FPS, making it the single point of concern in the entire dataset.

Across all resolutions, the scaling from High to Ultra is particularly punishing: at 1080p, it costs 69.3 FPS (185.5 to 116.2); at 1440p, it costs 50.2 FPS (134.6 to 84.4); and at 4K, it costs 31.1 FPS (84.7 to 53.6). This pattern suggests that Ultra applies a disproportionately high load on the GPU’s shader and ROP units, making it a poor choice for marginal visual gains.

FAQ

*Q: Is this combo sufficient for 60 FPS at 4K in Downfall?*

A: Yes, but only at Low or Medium settings. The measured averages show 125.9 FPS on Low and 104.8 FPS on Medium at 3840x2160. High settings drop to 84.7 FPS, while Ultra falls to 53.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the i7-14700K compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70104, which is a 0 deltaPct from the i7-14700K’s 70074. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is 0.5% ahead, and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 1.4% behind, so the CPU is essentially tied with its direct sibling.

Q: What is the largest FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: On Low settings, the average goes from 282.1 FPS at 1920x1080 to 125.9 FPS at 3840x2160, a 156.2 FPS reduction. On Ultra, it drops from 116.2 FPS to 53.6 FPS, a 62.6 FPS loss.

Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM on the RX 7800 XT cause any bottlenecks in this game?

A: The measured data shows no evidence of VRAM-related stutters or limits. The memory size and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are more than adequate, as the FPS scaling is consistent with GPU compute load rather than memory capacity.

Q: Which settings preset gives the highest FPS at 1440p?

A: Low settings yield 198.8 FPS, followed by Medium at 165.6 FPS, High at 134.6 FPS, and Ultra at 84.4 FPS. Medium is the highest preset that remains well above 100 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU rank against its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7800 XT scores 32619 on average. The AMD FirePro S9300 X2 is 0.2% ahead, the NVIDIA P104-100 is 0.4% behind, and the NVIDIA T600 Mobile is 0.7% behind, placing it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-14700K

Cores / Threads 20 / 28
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2430 MHz MHz
TDP 263 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 125.9
3840x2160 Medium 104.8
3840x2160 High 84.7
3840x2160 Ultra 53.6
2560x1440 Low 198.8
2560x1440 Medium 165.6
2560x1440 High 134.6
2560x1440 Ultra 84.4
1920x1080 Low 282.1
1920x1080 Medium 228.9
1920x1080 High 185.5
1920x1080 Ultra 116.2

Downfall with ii7-14700K + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 7800 XT + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-14700K + RX 7800 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.