Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 104 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 61 | 73 | 88 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 94 | 115 | 140 |
| 1080p Full HD | 84 | 132 | 165 | 201 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data for Downfall shows a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases, but the magnitude of the drop reveals important information about the system's balance. At 1080p with High settings, the combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT delivers 131.6 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same settings, the frame rate drops to 93.9 FPS, a reduction of roughly 29%. The jump from 1440p to 4K is more severe, with the average falling to 60.6 FPS, another 35% decline. This steep falloff at 4K indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions.
The Low settings preset tells a similar story but with higher absolute numbers. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 200.6 FPS, which is a strong result for a horror title. At 1440p Low, the average is 140.3 FPS, and at 4K Low, it drops to 88.1 FPS. The scaling between Low and High settings is substantial, suggesting that the game's graphical options have a significant impact on rendering load. The delta from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is over 56%, which is a larger proportional drop than at High settings, where the 1080p-to-4K reduction is about 54%. This consistency across presets points to a GPU-bound scenario at 4K regardless of settings.
The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic resolution penalty. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 83.5 FPS, which is playable but not exceptional. At 1440p Ultra, it falls to 60.6 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it plummets to 40 FPS. The 1080p-to-4K drop at Ultra is over 52%, but the absolute numbers are low enough to make 4K Ultra impractical for smooth gameplay. The data indicates that the RX 7600 XT has enough headroom at 1080p and 1440p for most settings, but 4K Ultra pushes the card beyond its comfort zone. The scaling pattern suggests that the GPU's 16 GB memory and 128-bit bus are sufficient for the game's demands at lower resolutions, but the rendering workload at 4K overwhelms the card's compute capabilities.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The card features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. Its base clock is 1980 MHz, with a boost clock of 2755 MHz and a game clock of 2470 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. These specifications place the RX 7600 XT at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs in the benchmark database, with an average benchmark score of 20146.
In the context of Downfall, the GPU's performance is clearly the dominant factor at higher resolutions. The measured FPS at 4K Medium (72.8 FPS) and 4K High (60.6 FPS) show that the card can handle the game at 4K with moderate settings, but Ultra at 4K drops to 40 FPS, which is a significant penalty. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor in this title, as the game does not appear to exceed the memory allocation even at 4K Ultra. The memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s is adequate for the game's texture streaming demands, as evidenced by the consistent performance scaling across settings.
Comparing the RX 7600 XT to its nearest rivals in the database reveals that it sits in a competitive position. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average score of 20258, which is 0.6% higher than the XT variant's 20146, a negligible difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER scores 19774, which is 1.9% lower. The RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 1.9% higher, while the RX 460 scores 20088, just 0.3% lower. These deltas indicate that the RX 7600 XT is closely matched with its immediate competitors, and the measured FPS in Downfall reflects this balanced positioning. The GPU's 22.57 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 352.6 GTexel/s texture rate are sufficient for the game's horror-themed rendering, which typically involves darker scenes and fewer on-screen objects compared to open-world titles.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700. The i5-12400F sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19221.
In Downfall, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 200.6 FPS, which is close to the CPU's practical limit for this game. The single-thread performance of the i5-12400F, as measured by a 3DMark single-thread score of 909 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2332, is strong enough to feed the GPU at high frame rates. The multi-thread performance, indicated by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16518 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 9138, provides ample headroom for background tasks and game logic.
Comparing the i5-12400F to its nearest rivals shows a tight grouping. The Intel Core i7-8700K has an average score of 19210, just 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i5-1335U scores 19167, 0.3% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 19364, 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18979, 1.3% lower. These small deltas mean that the i5-12400F is essentially equivalent to its peers in overall CPU performance, and the measured FPS in Downfall reflects this balance. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for the game's requirements, as the frame rates at 1080p are not bottlenecked by processor limitations. The data shows that at 1080p High, the system reaches 131.6 FPS, which is a healthy result that indicates the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for Downfall with the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT covers three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 200.6 FPS, which is the highest recorded in the entire dataset. Medium at 1080p drops to 165.4 FPS, High to 131.6 FPS, and Ultra to 83.5 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a total reduction of over 58%, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a heavy rendering load. The gap between Medium and High is approximately 34 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is about 48 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset adds substantial effects that tax the GPU.
At 1440p, the Low preset achieves 140.3 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Medium at 1440p delivers 114.8 FPS, High drops to 93.9 FPS, and Ultra falls to 60.6 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result is exactly the same as the 4K High result, which is an interesting data point that suggests the frame rate is hitting a similar ceiling in both scenarios. The 1440p data shows a more compressed range compared to 1080p, with the Low-to-Ultra spread being about 80 FPS, compared to over 117 FPS at 1080p. This compression indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as resolution increases.
At 4K, the Low preset delivers 88.1 FPS, which is playable for a horror game. Medium at 4K drops to 72.8 FPS, High to 60.6 FPS, and Ultra to 40 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the lowest in the dataset and is below the threshold for comfortable gameplay in most scenarios. The 4K scaling shows that the RX 7600 XT can handle 4K with Low to Medium settings, but High and Ultra require a reduction in resolution or settings adjustments. The data also shows that the game is more GPU-intensive at 4K, as the CPU's performance headroom is not the limiting factor. The combination of the i5-12400F and RX 7600 XT ranks 1093 out of 1741 combinations in the game, placing it in the upper-middle tier of tested configurations.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combination in Downfall?
A: The data shows that 1440p with Medium or High settings provides the best balance, with 114.8 FPS and 93.9 FPS respectively. At 4K, only Low and Medium settings break the 60 FPS threshold, with 88.1 FPS and 72.8 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle 4K Ultra in Downfall?
A: No, the 4K Ultra preset averages 40 FPS, which is below the standard 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. The GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution and settings combination.
Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to the RX 7600 in this context?
A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 20146, which is 0.6% lower than the RX 7600's 20258. This negligible difference suggests near-identical performance in Downfall.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?
A: The data indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 200.6 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 40 FPS, showing that the GPU's rendering capacity is the primary constraint.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the Low preset averages 200.6 FPS, while Ultra averages 83.5 FPS, a difference of over 117 FPS. This shows that the Ultra preset imposes a much heavier load on the GPU.
Q: How does the i5-12400F's performance compare to its closest rival?
A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19221, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-8700K's 19210. This makes the two processors virtually identical in overall performance.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 88.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 72.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 60.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 40.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 140.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 114.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 93.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 60.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 200.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 165.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 131.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 83.5 |
Downfall with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400F + RX 7600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.