Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
134
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 134 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 76 93 114
1440p QHD 77 123 150 183
1080p Full HD 108 172 210 257

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 114
3840x2160 Medium 93
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Ultra 48
2560x1440 Low 183
2560x1440 Medium 150
2560x1440 High 123
2560x1440 Ultra 77
1920x1080 Low 257
1920x1080 Medium 210
1920x1080 High 172
1920x1080 Ultra 108

Downfall with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon RX 7900M, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AMD Radeon RX 7900M pairing delivers a robust 4K-capable experience in Downfall, a 2016 horror title. The data shows that this combination sits in the upper tier of tested configurations, ranking 1219th out of 2928 total combos, placing it in the top half of all systems. The measured frame rates indicate that the system is well-balanced for this title, with the GPU emerging as the primary performance limiter at higher resolutions and settings.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Downfall?*

A: This CPU and GPU combination ranks 1219th out of 2928 tested system configurations, which places it in the 58th percentile or higher. This indicates that the pairing outperforms a majority of other tested combos in this specific game.

Q: What is the best performance result for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 257 FPS at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. At the more demanding 4K Ultra preset, the average frame rate drops to 48 FPS, showing the performance envelope spans a wide range depending on the settings and resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740. This is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, and 2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7%.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900M has an average benchmark score of 97487. It is 0.4% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro VII but 4.3% slower than the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000. It outperforms the AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 by 5.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 by 6.3%.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 resolution, the average frame rate drops from 183 FPS on Low settings to 77 FPS on Ultra settings. This represents a significant 58% reduction in performance when enabling the highest visual quality preset.

Q: Does the system maintain playable frame rates at 4K?

A: Yes, the data shows the system is capable of 4K gaming. At 3840x2160, it achieves an average of 76 FPS on High settings and 93 FPS on Medium settings. The Ultra preset is the only setting that falls below 60 FPS, averaging 48 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, allowing for substantial single-thread performance when needed. The processor is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC and features a 64 MB shared L3 cache, which helps in keeping data close to the cores for faster access. With a TDP of 55 W, it is a high-end mobile part designed for performance.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates its strength. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 35314, while its single-core score is 2044. The Geekbench multi-core and single-core scores are 20992 and 2464, respectively. These results place the CPU in the 95th percentile compared to all other processors, indicating it is a top-tier part. Its average benchmark score of 77740 is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, but 1.7% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K.

For Downfall, a horror game from 2016, the CPU's high clock speeds and substantial core count are more than sufficient to handle the game's logic and physics. The game is not likely to be heavily multi-threaded, so the strong single-core performance, evidenced by the 2044 Cinebench R23 score, is more critical for maintaining high frame rates. The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this configuration, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution and graphics settings, which are primarily GPU-bound tasks.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data for Downfall provides clear guidance on the optimal settings for different priorities. The system is capable of very high refresh rate gaming at 1080p, where even the Ultra preset achieves 108 FPS on average. For players seeking the absolute highest frame rates, the Low preset at 1920x1080 delivers a massive 257 FPS, which would be ideal for a 240Hz or higher display.

At 2560x1440, the High preset offers an excellent balance, providing an average of 123 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and leaves headroom for demanding scenes. The Medium preset at this resolution yields 150 FPS, but the jump to High is modest in terms of visual quality for the slight reduction in performance. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 77 FPS, which is still playable but represents a significant visual cost.

For 4K gaming on a 3840x2160 display, the High preset is the recommended choice, delivering an average of 76 FPS. This provides a smooth and visually detailed experience. The Medium preset is also a strong option, with an average of 93 FPS, but it may have lower texture quality. The Low preset at 4K achieves 114 FPS but sacrifices too much visual fidelity for a horror game where atmosphere is key. The Ultra preset, with an average of 48 FPS, is not recommended as it falls below the standard 60 FPS target and the performance drop from High is substantial.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested system configurations for Downfall, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AMD Radeon RX 7900M achieves a rank of 1219 out of 2928. This places the combo in the upper half of all systems tested for this game, outperforming over 1700 other configurations. This rank suggests that while it is not the absolute top-tier system, it is a high-performing combination that can handle the game's requirements at high resolutions.

The rank is a result of the combined capabilities of both the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile standing among all processors ensures that it will not hold back the GPU, which itself sits in the 94th percentile among all GPUs. This balanced pairing allows the system to achieve the high frame rates seen in the measured data. The system's performance is consistent with its component-level benchmarks, showing that the two parts work well together without a significant bottleneck in either direction for this title.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900M is a high-end mobile GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1825 MHz and a boost clock of 2090 MHz. With 4608 shading units, 288 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, it is a highly capable graphics processor. The GPU also includes 72 ray tracing cores, though their impact in this 2016 title is likely minimal.

In synthetic benchmarks, the RX 7900M posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4201. Its Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 129499 and 158760, respectively. This performance places the GPU in the 94th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 97487. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is 0.4% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro VII and 5.4% faster than the AMD Radeon Instinct MI60, but 4.3% slower than the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000.

The GPU is the primary driver of the frame rates in Downfall. The data shows that as resolution and settings increase, the average FPS drops, which is typical of a GPU-bound workload. At 1080p Low, the GPU renders frames at 257 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 48 FPS. This scaling indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this system for this game, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at all tested settings. The 16 GB of VRAM is also more than sufficient for this title, even at 4K resolution with High settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Downfall provides a comprehensive look at the system's performance across three resolutions and four quality presets.

At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. The Low preset achieves an average of 257 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. The Medium preset delivers 210 FPS, with a minimum of 178 FPS and a maximum of 241 FPS. The High preset averages 172 FPS, and even the Ultra preset maintains a high average of 108 FPS. These numbers show that the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong. The Low preset averages 183 FPS, and the Medium preset hits 150 FPS, with a minimum of 127 FPS and a maximum of 172 FPS. The High preset delivers a smooth 123 FPS average. The Ultra preset is the only one to see a significant drop, averaging 77 FPS. This resolution offers a good balance between visual quality and performance, with High being the most balanced preset.

At 3840x2160, the system still provides playable frame rates. The Low preset averages 114 FPS, which is impressive for 4K. The Medium preset achieves 93 FPS, with a minimum of 79 FPS and a maximum of 107 FPS. The High preset averages 76 FPS, which is suitable for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of 48 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for optimal smoothness. The data shows that 4K High is the best choice for a visually detailed and smooth experience.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling of frame rates from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrates the system's performance characteristics. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 257 at 1080p to 183 at 1440p, a reduction of 28.8%. Moving to 4K, the average further drops to 114, which is a 55.6% reduction from 1080p. This scaling is typical for a GPU-limited scenario, where the number of pixels being rendered increases significantly.

At High settings, the pattern is similar. The average FPS is 172 at 1080p, falling to 123 at 1440p (a 28.5% drop) and then to 76 at 4K (a 55.8% drop from 1080p). The percentage decrease from 1080p to 1440p and from 1440p to 4K is relatively consistent across Low and High settings, indicating that the GPU is consistently the limiting factor.

The Ultra preset shows the most significant scaling. From 1080p (108 FPS) to 1440p (77 FPS), there is a 28.7% drop. From 1440p to 4K (48 FPS), the drop is 37.7%, and from 1080p to 4K, the total reduction is 55.6%. The consistent percentage drops across all settings strongly indicate that the GPU is the primary performance limiter. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would not scale as dramatically with resolution, as CPU load is relatively constant across resolutions. The data confirms that the AMD Radeon RX 7900M is the determining factor for performance in Downfall, and the CPU provides ample support to avoid becoming a constraint.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket AMD Socket FP11
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900M

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2090 MHz MHz
TDP 180 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon RX 7900M in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 114.0
3840x2160 Medium 93.0
3840x2160 High 76.0
3840x2160 Ultra 48.0
2560x1440 Low 183.0
2560x1440 Medium 150.0
2560x1440 High 123.0
2560x1440 Ultra 77.0
1920x1080 Low 257.0
1920x1080 Medium 210.0
1920x1080 High 172.0
1920x1080 Ultra 108.0

Downfall with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 7900M + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + RX 7900M

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.