Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 106 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 60 | 73 | 90 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 97 | 118 | 144 |
| 1080p Full HD | 85 | 135 | 165 | 202 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile combination delivers a playable experience in Downfall across most tested configurations, though the data reveals a clear performance ceiling at higher resolutions. The combo ranks in the 39th percentile of tested systems, indicating that while it handles 1080p and 1440p with ease, it struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K Ultra settings. Benchmark results show a strong CPU that is rarely the limiting factor, with the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface becoming the primary constraint as resolution and settings increase.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which positions it as a high-end mobile part. The CPU’s 64 MB of L3 cache and DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth provide ample headroom for gaming workloads. In synthetic benchmarks, the processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 and a single-core score of 6030, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.
For Downfall, a horror title that often relies on single-threaded performance for game logic and AI, the 8945HX’s strong single-core results ensure that the CPU does not bottleneck the frame rate. The data supports this interpretation: at 1080p Low settings, the combo reaches 202 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most displays. Even at 1080p Ultra, the average FPS of 85 suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately, as the frame rate drop from Low to Ultra (202 to 85 FPS) is more indicative of GPU workload than CPU limitations.
The processor’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with a delta of 0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D with a delta of 0.6%, showing the 8945HX is competitively positioned. However, in gaming, the CPU’s 55 W TDP and mobile design mean thermal constraints could affect sustained performance, though the measured FPS data does not show signs of throttling. The 8945HX’s 32 threads are largely underutilized in Downfall, but the high boost clock ensures that the game’s primary thread has access to the fastest core available. Overall, the CPU role is to provide a stable foundation, and the benchmark results indicate it succeeds without becoming a limiting factor at any tested resolution.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It features 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, with a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a critical factor in Downfall, as the game’s horror environments often feature high-resolution textures and complex lighting effects that demand substantial VRAM.
At 4K resolution, the GPU’s role becomes dominant. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 60 FPS, which drops to 38 FPS at Ultra settings. This steep decline suggests that the 8 GB VRAM is insufficient for Ultra settings at 4K, likely causing texture swapping or reduced memory efficiency. The GPU’s 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, where the 4060 Mobile delivers 135 FPS and 97 FPS at High settings respectively, but the 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth-intensive tasks at higher resolutions.
The GPU’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a delta of -0.7%, and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT with a delta of 0.8%, indicating the 4060 Mobile is a mid-range performer. In Downfall, the GPU is clearly the primary bottleneck at 4K, as evidenced by the 38 FPS at Ultra settings, which is nearly half the frame rate of the High preset. The 4060 Mobile’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the data shows that 4K Ultra exceeds its capabilities. The GPU’s 67th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms its mid-tier status, and in this game, that translates to a need for settings adjustments at higher resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile ranks 2270th out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall. This places the combo in the bottom 39% of all systems, which is a notable result given the CPU’s high performance. The ranking indicates that while the processor is in the 95th percentile, the GPU’s limitations drag the overall gaming experience down. The combo rank is a direct reflection of the GPU’s 67th percentile status, and the data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most scenarios.
Compared to other tested combos, this system is positioned below the median, meaning that a significant portion of tested hardware achieves higher frame rates in Downfall. The ranking is likely influenced by the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM, which becomes a bottleneck at 4K Ultra settings, as well as the 128-bit memory bus’s bandwidth constraints. The CPU’s high benchmark scores do not translate to a better combo rank because the game is GPU-bound at higher resolutions. However, at 1080p, the combo’s performance is competitive, with the 165 FPS average at Medium settings placing it above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
The combo rank of 2270 out of 3716 suggests that users should not expect top-tier performance in Downfall, but the system is capable of delivering playable frame rates at lower resolutions. The data shows that the combo is more than adequate for 1080p gaming, where it achieves over 135 FPS at High settings, and even at 1440p, it maintains 97 FPS at High. The ranking is a holistic measure, and the CPU’s strength is overshadowed by the GPU’s mid-range capabilities. This combo is best suited for gamers who prioritize 1080p or 1440p gaming, as the 4K performance is subpar.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average of 202 FPS at Low settings, 165 FPS at Medium, 135 FPS at High, and 85 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 190 FPS, indicating a stable frame delivery. At 1080p, the combo easily exceeds the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and even at Ultra, the 85 FPS average is playable, though the drop from High to Ultra is substantial.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The combo achieves 144 FPS at Low settings, 118 FPS at Medium, 97 FPS at High, and 60 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 100 FPS and a maximum of 136 FPS, which is a reasonable range for a competitive or immersive experience. The 1440p results indicate that the GPU is still capable, but the Ultra preset’s 60 FPS average is borderline, as it barely meets the standard for smooth gameplay. The drop from High to Ultra at 1440p is 37 FPS, which is a significant reduction, highlighting the GPU’s limitations.
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain high frame rates. The average FPS is 90 at Low settings, 73 at Medium, 60 at High, and 38 at Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. The 4K results clearly show that the GPU is the bottleneck, as the CPU’s performance is more than sufficient for this resolution. The drop from High to Ultra at 4K is 22 FPS, which is less severe than at 1440p, but the overall frame rates are lower. The 38 FPS at Ultra is not playable for a smooth experience, and even the 60 FPS at High is marginal for 4K gaming. The data shows that the combo is best used at 1080p or 1440p, with 4K reserved for Low or Medium settings.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The resolution scaling of the combo reveals a clear pattern of GPU limitation. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS at High settings drops from 135 to 97, a reduction of 28.1%. From 1440p to 4K, the average FPS drops from 97 to 60, a reduction of 38.1%. This increasing percentage drop as resolution increases is a classic sign of a GPU-bound system. The CPU’s performance is consistent across resolutions, but the GPU’s workload increases significantly with pixel count, leading to diminishing returns.
At Low settings, the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is from 202 to 90, a reduction of 55.4%. This indicates that even at the lowest settings, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute capabilities are stretched at 4K. The Medium preset shows a drop from 165 to 73 FPS, a 55.8% reduction, which is similar to the Low preset. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 85 to 38 FPS, a 55.3% reduction, showing a consistent scaling pattern across all presets. This consistency suggests that the GPU’s bottleneck is not related to specific settings but rather to the resolution itself.
The data indicates that the limiting component is the GPU, specifically its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus. The CPU’s high benchmark scores and the fact that the FPS drops are proportional to resolution increase confirm that the processor is not the constraint. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for the data throughput required at 4K, leading to the steep FPS drops. The RTX 4060 Mobile’s 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is also a factor, as the GPU’s compute power is not enough to handle the pixel shader workload at 4K. The resolution scaling data strongly suggests that for this combo, 1080p is the sweet spot, with 1440p being a viable alternative at lower settings, while 4K should be avoided for high-fidelity gaming.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
Based on the measured FPS data, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance for this combo across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers an average of 165 FPS with a minimum of 140 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience. The High preset at 1080p achieves 135 FPS, which is also excellent, but the Medium preset’s higher frame rate provides more headroom for demanding scenes. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset achieves 118 FPS with a minimum of 100 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays. The High preset at 1440p delivers 97 FPS, which is still playable, but the Medium preset offers a more consistent experience.
At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the highest playable option, with an average of 73 FPS and a minimum of 62 FPS. This is a playable frame rate, though the High preset’s 60 FPS average is borderline. For 4K gaming, the Low preset’s 90 FPS average is the best choice for a smooth experience, but the visual quality is significantly reduced. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it only achieves 85 FPS at 1080p, 60 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset’s performance is below the 60 FPS threshold at 1440p and 4K, making it unsuitable for a smooth gaming experience.
The data shows that the Medium preset provides the best experience for this combo, as it maintains a high frame rate with a minimum that stays above 60 FPS at all resolutions. The High preset is a viable alternative for users who prioritize visual quality, but the frame rate drops are noticeable, especially at 1440p and 4K. For users with 1080p displays, the High preset is recommended for the best balance of visuals and performance, while 1440p users should stick to Medium. 4K users should use the Low preset for the most consistent experience, as the Medium preset’s 73 FPS average is acceptable but the minimum of 62 FPS may dip in demanding scenes.
FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data
*Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested systems in Downfall?*
A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile ranks 2270th out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall.
Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved at 1080p with this combo?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 202 FPS, which is the highest measured FPS across all tested configurations.
Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to the RTX 2080 in average benchmark score?
A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729, while the RTX 2080 has a score of 22895, resulting in a delta of -0.7%, meaning the 4060 Mobile is slightly slower.
Q: What is the minimum FPS at 4K Medium settings?
A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the combo delivers a minimum FPS of 62, with an average of 73 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor, as the 4K Ultra preset achieves only 38 FPS, which is significantly below the 60 FPS threshold, while the CPU’s performance is more than sufficient for this workload.
Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performance processor for gaming and other tasks.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 90.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 73.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 60.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 38.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 144.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 118.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 97.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 60.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 202.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 165.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 135.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 85.0 |
Downfall with Ryzen 9 8945HX + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 8945HX + RTX 4060 Mobile
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.