Downfall
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 142 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 83 | 98 | 121 |
| 1440p QHD | 83 | 131 | 157 | 193 |
| 1080p Full HD | 112 | 183 | 221 | 273 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
FAQ
Q: What is the combo rank of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Downfall?
A: This combination ranks 658 out of 1,741 tested combos in the game, placing it in the upper portion of the database.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 7 7800X3D posts an average benchmark score of 31,580, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700F, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, and 0.6% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX.
Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to cards near its performance tier?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti averages 30,849 in benchmarks, sitting 0.3% above the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME, 0.8% below the AMD Radeon RX 6700, and 0.9% below the NVIDIA Quadro M5000.
Q: What frame rates does this combo achieve at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured average is 183.1 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings, which is well above typical display refresh rates.
Q: How much performance drops when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?
A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average is 112.4 FPS. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average falls to 48.5 FPS, a reduction of roughly 57%.
Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect the game?
A: The card has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 608.3 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity is sufficient for the measured settings in Downfall, though Ultra at 4K shows the largest frame rate penalty.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It also carries 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, which are relevant for modern rendering features. The GPU's base clock is 1575 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, while the memory runs at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6X frame buffer, paired with a 256-bit bus, delivers 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that becomes increasingly important at higher resolutions.
In Downfall, the measured frame rates show a clear pattern: the GPU is the dominant factor in performance scaling. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 272.8 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 48.5 FPS. The 4K High result of 83.2 FPS versus the 1080p High result of 183.1 FPS demonstrates that resolution scaling heavily taxes the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth. The RTX 3070 Ti's 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate and 339.8 GTexel/s texture rate are adequate for 1440p gaming, but the 4K Ultra preset pushes the card to its limits.
The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 21.75 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1) suggest strong raw throughput for a card of this class. However, the measured data indicates that the 8 GB memory capacity becomes a constraint at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 48.5 — the lowest of any tested configuration. The card's percentile ranking of 74 among all GPUs, combined with its 74th percentile standing, places it in the upper-midrange tier of the database.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance curve across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 272.8 FPS, which drops to 193 FPS at 1440p Low and 120.9 FPS at 4K Low. This represents a 56% reduction from 1080p to 4K at the lowest settings, suggesting the GPU's raw throughput is the limiting factor even when visual load is minimal.
At Medium settings, the pattern continues: 220.9 FPS at 1080p, 156.7 FPS at 1440p, and 98.4 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 29% drop, while 1440p to 4K shows a 37% drop. This indicates that the GPU's memory bandwidth and pixel processing capabilities are being progressively saturated as resolution increases.
High settings produce 183.1 FPS at 1080p, 131.3 FPS at 1440p, and 83.2 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is 28%, while the gap between 1440p and 4K is 37%. These percentages are consistent across settings, which points to a resolution-bound bottleneck rather than a settings-related one. The GPU is the primary constraint here; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 3D V-Cache and 96 MB shared L3 cache are more than sufficient to feed the GPU at these frame rates.
Ultra settings show the most dramatic scaling: 112.4 FPS at 1080p, 82.9 FPS at 1440p, and 48.5 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is 57% lower than 1080p Ultra, confirming that the combination of high resolution and maximum settings overwhelms the 8 GB frame buffer and the GPU's 608.3 GB/s bandwidth. For players targeting 4K, the data suggests that High settings are the practical ceiling, while 1440p Ultra remains viable at 82.9 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of 1,741 tested combinations, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D with RTX 3070 Ti occupies the 658th position. This places it in the 62nd percentile of all combos, meaning roughly 62% of tested configurations perform worse. The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU's strong synthetic scores and the GPU's mid-range tier.
The CPU's average benchmark score of 31,580 puts it just ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700F (31,543, deltaPct +0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31,495, deltaPct +0.3%). The Ryzen 7 8700G (31,407, +0.6%) and Ryzen 7 7745HX (31,402, +0.6%) are slightly further behind. This indicates that the 7800X3D is performing at the top of its immediate competitive set, with no rival exceeding it by more than a fraction of a percent.
On the GPU side, the RTX 3070 Ti's average score of 30,849 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (31,112, deltaPct -0.8%) and the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31,142, deltaPct -0.9%). The AMD Radeon RX 590 GME (30,755, +0.3%) is the only rival that the 3070 Ti beats, while the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q (31,220, -1.2%) sits slightly above. These small deltas suggest that the GPU is in a tightly contested performance band.
The combo's rank of 658 out of 1,741 is influenced by both components. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs is excellent, but the GPU's 74th percentile holds the overall combo back. In Downfall specifically, the measured frame rates show that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, which aligns with the combo's mid-pack ranking. The data indicates that pairing this CPU with a higher-tier GPU would likely move the combo significantly up the ranks, while the current GPU keeps it in the upper-middle tier.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimizing the experience in Downfall. At 1920x1080, all settings are playable: Low produces 272.8 FPS, Medium 220.9 FPS, High 183.1 FPS, and Ultra 112.4 FPS. For 1080p users, Ultra is the recommended preset, as it delivers over 100 FPS while providing the highest visual quality. The 112.4 FPS average is well above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves headroom for demanding scenes.
At 2560x1440, the situation becomes more nuanced. Low yields 193 FPS, Medium 156.7 FPS, High 131.3 FPS, and Ultra 82.9 FPS. The Ultra preset remains playable, but the drop from High to Ultra is 37%, which is a substantial cost for the additional visual features. For players with 1440p displays, High is the optimal balance: 131.3 FPS is smooth, and the visual difference between High and Ultra is often marginal in horror titles. Ultra is viable for those who prioritize image quality over frame rate consistency.
The 4K results show a different story. At 3840x2160, Low produces 120.9 FPS, Medium 98.4 FPS, High 83.2 FPS, and Ultra 48.5 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that drops below 60 FPS, and the 48.5 FPS average suggests that even the minimum frame rate could be problematic in intense scenes. For 4K users, High is the recommended preset: 83.2 FPS is comfortably playable, and the GPU's 8 GB memory capacity is sufficient at this setting. Medium is a solid fallback for those who want higher frame rates, while Ultra should be avoided unless the player accepts sub-60 FPS performance.
The data shows a consistent pattern across all resolutions: High settings provide the best balance between visual fidelity and frame rate. At 1080p, High offers 183.1 FPS; at 1440p, it offers 131.3 FPS; and at 4K, it offers 83.2 FPS. These figures suggest that the RTX 3070 Ti is well-matched to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D at High settings, with the CPU never becoming a bottleneck even at 1080p where frame rates exceed 180 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 120.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 98.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 83.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 48.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 193.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 156.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 131.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 82.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 272.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 220.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 183.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 112.4 |
Downfall with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.