Downfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER secures a rank of 701 out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the top 18.9% of all configurations. That ranking reflects a system that delivers high, playable frame rates across most settings, though the CPU’s older architecture becomes apparent at the highest fidelity presets. The data indicates this is a GPU-dominant pairing, where the RTX 4080 SUPER drives the vast majority of performance, but the Ryzen 5 2600’s single-thread capabilities cap the ceiling in less demanding scenarios. This combo sits well above the median tested setup, but it is not near the top tier, as the processor prevents the GPU from fully releasing its potential at lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 701 out of 3716 represents a solid, above-average standing, roughly in the 81st percentile of all tested pairings for Downfall. This is a strong result, but it is not exceptional, given that the RTX 4080 SUPER is a high-end GPU. The ranking suggests that the Ryzen 5 2600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen+ architecture, provides enough throughput for the game’s core mechanics, but it does not boost the combo to the very top. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 21484 places it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V (0.2% higher score) and the Intel Core i9-11900H (0.5% higher). These marginal differences in synthetic benchmarks translate to a processor that is competitive with mid-range laptops from later generations, yet it lacks the headroom of modern desktop chips.

In contrast, the RTX 4080 SUPER is a dominant force, with an average benchmark score of 54209 and a percentile rank of 86 among all GPUs. Its closest rival, the RTX 4080, scores nearly identically at 54247 (-0.1% delta), indicating that the SUPER variant offers minimal performance uplift over its predecessor. The data shows a clear imbalance: the GPU is performing near the top of its class, while the CPU is a generation behind, which explains why the combo does not crack the top 500. For Downfall, a horror title that likely benefits from consistent frame pacing, this pairing delivers a smooth experience at 1440p and 4K, but at 1080p the processor becomes the limiting factor, as evidenced by the frame rate scaling patterns.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the undisputed performance driver in this configuration. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. This memory capacity and bandwidth are more than sufficient for Downfall, a 2016 horror title, even at 4K resolution with high textures. The GPU’s boost clock of 2550 MHz, paired with 10240 shading units and 80 RT cores, provides immense rasterization and ray tracing throughput, though the game’s age means ray tracing is unlikely to be a major factor. The card’s FP32 performance of 52.22 TFLOPS ensures that it can handle the game’s physics and lighting effects without breaking a sweat.

The benchmark results confirm the GPU’s dominance. At 4K Ultra, the combo still manages 74 FPS, while at 4K High it jumps to 118 FPS. These numbers are well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that the GPU is rarely the bottleneck. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s nearest rivals include the RTX 4080 (-0.1%) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (-1.1%), both of which would perform similarly in this game. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility ensure that it handles modern rendering paths efficiently, even in an older title like Downfall. The card’s 16-pin power connector and 320 W TDP suggest it is a power-hungry component, but the benchmark data shows it delivers exceptional performance per frame.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 2600 a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 SUPER in Downfall?

A: At 1080p, yes. The frame rates at 1080p Ultra (167 FPS) and 1080p High (217 FPS) are significantly lower than what the GPU could theoretically produce, suggesting the CPU limits performance. At 4K, the gap narrows, and the GPU becomes the primary driver, as seen by the 118 FPS at 4K High.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain over 144 FPS?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo achieves 208 FPS average, and at 1920x1080 with Medium settings it hits 233 FPS. For a 144 Hz display, 1440p Medium or High (190 FPS) are excellent choices, offering a balance of visual fidelity and high frame rates.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to its non-SUPER counterpart based on the data?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, while the RTX 4080 scores 54247. The deltaPct of -0.1% indicates the SUPER is essentially identical in performance, making the two cards interchangeable in this game.

Q: Does the combo maintain playable frame rates at 4K Ultra?

A: Yes, but with a caveat. The 4K Ultra preset yields an average of 74 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Dropping to 4K High improves the average to 118 FPS, a significant jump that suggests Ultra settings are overly demanding on the CPU.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 2600 scores 157.3 in Cinebench R15 single-core and 2239 in Passmark single-thread. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V and Intel Core i9-11900H, have higher average benchmark scores by 0.2% and 0.5% respectively, indicating the Ryzen is slightly behind in single-threaded tasks.

Q: Can this combo handle ray tracing in Downfall?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 80 RT cores and is capable of ray tracing, but Downfall was released in 2016, before ray tracing was common. The data does not include ray tracing benchmarks, so performance is unknown, but the GPU’s raw power suggests it would handle it if enabled.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates: 250 FPS on Low, 233 FPS on Medium (with a min of 198 and max of 268), 217 FPS on High, and 167 FPS on Ultra. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound, as the gap between Low and Ultra is only 83 FPS, while the GPU could theoretically push much higher.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain robust: 223 FPS on Low, 208 FPS on Medium (min 177, max 239), 190 FPS on High, and 119 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is moderate, with the Ultra preset seeing a 48 FPS reduction, while the Low preset only loses 27 FPS. This suggests that at 1440p, the GPU is starting to take on more of the workload, but the CPU still limits the lower settings.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are still excellent: 177 FPS on Low, 144 FPS on Medium (min 123, max 166), 118 FPS on High, and 74 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Ultra result is the only one that dips below 100 FPS, indicating that the combination of high resolution and maximum settings finally stresses the GPU enough to become a significant factor. The scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a clear pattern: the higher the resolution, the smaller the CPU bottleneck, and the more the GPU’s raw power shines through.

Resolution Scaling

The data reveals a distinct scaling pattern that highlights the system’s limiting component. From 1080p to 1440p, the average frame rate drops by approximately 11-14% across all settings, which is a relatively small penalty. For example, High settings go from 217 FPS at 1080p to 190 FPS at 1440p, a 12.4% reduction. Low settings drop from 250 FPS to 223 FPS, an 10.8% decrease. This mild scaling indicates that the CPU is still the primary bottleneck at these resolutions, as the GPU has ample headroom.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is more pronounced. High settings drop from 190 FPS to 118 FPS, a 37.9% reduction, while Low settings fall from 223 FPS to 177 FPS, a 20.6% decrease. The steeper drop at higher settings suggests that the GPU is now becoming the limiting factor, as the increased pixel count demands more memory bandwidth and shading power. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 736.3 GB/s bandwidth and 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are being taxed at 4K, especially on Ultra settings, which drop from 119 FPS at 1440p to 74 FPS at 4K (a 37.8% reduction).

This scaling behavior tells a clear story: at 1080p and 1440p, the Ryzen 5 2600’s 4.80 billion transistors on a 12 nm process cannot feed the RTX 4080 SUPER fast enough, capping frame rates. At 4K, the GPU’s workload increases to the point where it becomes the bottleneck, allowing the CPU to catch up. The result is that users seeking maximum frame rates should stick to 1440p, while those prioritizing visual fidelity can use 4K High without sacrificing playability.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user’s refresh rate and resolution priorities. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance, delivering 233 FPS average with a minimum of 198 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay on any 144 Hz or even 240 Hz monitor, while maintaining solid visual quality. The High preset at 217 FPS is also viable, but the 16 FPS difference may not justify the extra graphical load on the CPU.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the sweet spot, achieving 190 FPS average. This provides excellent visual fidelity for the game’s horror atmosphere while keeping frame rates well above 144 Hz. The Medium preset at 208 FPS is slightly faster, but the visual downgrade from High may not be worth it for most players. The Ultra preset at 119 FPS is still playable, but it represents a significant drop and suggests that the CPU is struggling to maintain higher frame rates at this setting.

At 3840x2160, the High preset is strongly recommended, with an average of 118 FPS. This provides a near-60 FPS headroom for 4K gaming, ensuring a smooth experience on most displays. The Medium preset at 144 FPS is even better for high-refresh 4K monitors, but it sacrifices some graphical effects. The Ultra preset at 74 FPS is only suitable for users with 60 Hz displays who prioritize maximum visual quality over frame rate consistency. The Low preset at 177 FPS is unnecessary, as the game’s horror atmosphere benefits from higher settings, and the GPU has the power to handle them.