Doom

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Doom, with 4K remaining playable but demanding compromises. The data shows a combination that consistently pushes well past 100 FPS at mainstream resolutions, positioning it as a strong performer in the mid-range segment. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, component roles, and optimal settings for this specific pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo for Doom?

A: The combo ranks 1686 out of 2930 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems tested for this game. This indicates a solid, above-average configuration that outperforms a majority of other pairings in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 3700X compare to its closest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 3700X has an average benchmark score of 34260, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. It is virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and AMD EPYC 4244P, with a negligible 0.1% lead over both. It also edges out the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H by 0.5% but trails the Intel Core i5-13450HX by 0.2%.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to its nearest competitors?

A: The Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. It sits slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by 0.7% but leads the AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 by 1% each. It also outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 by 2.1%.

Q: What is the best resolution for a consistently smooth experience?

A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At Medium settings, it averages 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS, ensuring a fluid experience. While 1920x1080 offers higher frame rates, 1440p provides a significant visual upgrade while still maintaining excellent performance.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Doom?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K, the average frame rates range from 45 FPS on Ultra to 74 FPS on Low settings. The Medium preset is the only 4K option with a recorded minimum FPS (55), suggesting it is the most stable choice for a playable 4K experience.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The gap is substantial. At 1920x1080, the system averages 211 FPS on Low settings and 127 FPS on Ultra settings. This represents a 66% performance uplift when switching from Ultra to Low, which can be critical for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the primary driver of frame rates in this configuration, and its specifications directly explain the measured results. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, providing a wide dynamic range for varying workloads. This is complemented by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for the textures and assets in Doom at the tested resolutions and settings.

The GPU's raw compute capabilities, including a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s, are reflected in the scaling of performance across resolution. The benchmark data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate on High settings is 155 FPS, which drops to 101 FPS at 2560x1440 and further to 54 FPS at 3840x2160. This 65% performance drop from 1080p to 4K highlights the significant workload placed on the Radeon RX 9060's 1792 shading units and 64 ROPs.

The GPU's 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average score of 16014, contextualizes its performance. It sits in a competitive tier, trading blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. In Doom, this translates to a card that can dominate at 1080p and 1440p but requires setting adjustments to maintain playable frame rates at 4K. The data shows that the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is 29 FPS (74 vs 45), which is a massive margin that can make the difference between a choppy and a smooth experience.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X provides the processing foundation for this combo. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 2 architecture, it offers substantial multi-threaded capability. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz ensure responsive single-threaded performance, which is crucial for game logic and frame pacing. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency.

In the context of Doom, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data and process game state. The benchmark results suggest that the Ryzen 7 3700X is more than capable of keeping up with the Radeon RX 9060, as evidenced by the high frame rates at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080 Low settings, the system achieves 211 FPS, a figure that is unlikely to be bottlenecked by the CPU given its 84th percentile standing and average benchmark score of 34260.

The CPU's performance is closely matched with its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core i5-13450HX, with deltas of less than 0.2%. This parity means that in a game like Doom, the choice between these processors is unlikely to yield significant differences in frame rates. The CPU's 65W TDP and 7nm process node contribute to its efficiency, but its performance headroom is what matters here, allowing the GPU to operate without being starved of data. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth of the dual-channel DDR4 setup is also sufficient to support the demands of the game engine.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 3700X and Radeon RX 9060 secures a rank of 1686 out of 2930 tested combos in Doom. This places the system in the top 42% of all configurations, which is a respectable position for a mid-range pairing. This ranking is a direct result of the balanced capabilities of both components; the CPU is not holding back the GPU, and the GPU is powerful enough to deliver high frame rates at the most common gaming resolutions.

This rank is particularly impressive when considering the GPU's individual 59th percentile standing. The combo's overall rank is higher than what the GPU's percentile alone might suggest, indicating that the CPU is providing a solid platform that allows the GPU to perform at its best. The measured FPS data supports this, showing that the system can achieve playable frame rates even at 4K, which is often a challenge for GPUs in this performance tier.

Compared to other combos in the database, this system is positioned for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and smooth 1440p gaming. The 1686 rank means that while it is outclassed by high-end systems featuring top-tier CPUs and GPUs, it significantly outperforms entry-level and older configurations. The data shows that this pairing is a well-matched duo, with neither component creating a severe bottleneck in Doom across the tested settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this system depend entirely on the target resolution and refresh rate. The data shows a clear hierarchy, with performance scaling predictably with resolution and settings. The best experience balances visual fidelity with a consistently high frame rate.

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation. The system averages 127 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and sufficient for most high-refresh-rate monitors. While the Medium preset offers a higher average of 184 FPS, the jump to Ultra provides significant visual improvements in lighting and textures for a relatively modest performance cost. The High preset at 155 FPS is a solid middle ground, but Ultra is the best overall experience for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the High preset provides the best balance. It averages 101 FPS, which ensures a fluid experience on most 144Hz monitors. The Ultra preset drops to 82 FPS, which is still playable but makes it harder to fully utilize a high refresh rate display. The Medium preset averages 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS, but the visual step down from High is noticeable. Therefore, High is recommended for the best combination of performance and image quality at 1440p.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the only viable option for a stable experience. It is the only 4K setting with a recorded minimum FPS (55), ensuring that frame times remain consistent. While the Low preset offers a higher average of 74 FPS, the lack of a recorded minimum makes it a riskier choice for potential stutters. The Ultra preset at 45 FPS is below the ideal threshold for smooth gameplay. Thus, Medium is the recommended setting for 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across all combinations of resolution and settings.

1920x1080: The system delivers its highest frame rates here. On Low settings, it averages 211 FPS. The Medium preset averages 184 FPS, with a minimum of 156 FPS and a maximum of 212 FPS. High settings average 155 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still averages 127 FPS. This range shows the system is capable of exceeding 200 FPS on lower settings, making it ideal for competitive play.

2560x1440: Performance remains strong at this resolution. The Low preset averages 137 FPS. Medium settings average 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 137 FPS. High settings average 101 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 82 FPS. The data shows a consistent step-down of roughly 15-20 FPS between each settings tier, with the minimum FPS on Medium still exceeding 100 FPS.

3840x2160: This resolution proves to be the most challenging for the combo. The Low preset averages 74 FPS. The Medium preset averages 65 FPS, with a minimum of 55 FPS and a maximum of 74 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 54 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 45 FPS. The data reveals a significant performance cliff at 4K, with only the Low and Medium presets maintaining average frame rates above 60 FPS.