Dave The Diver

The data for Dave The Diver with the Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 presents a clear picture of a high-performance pairing that excels across all tested resolutions. The measured frames per second (FPS) indicate that this combination is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors and 4K gaming alike. This analysis examines the specific contributions of the CPU and GPU, the combo's standing among other tested configurations, and the optimal settings for the best experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Ultra settings for this combo?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 162 frames per second.

Q: How much of a performance drop occurs when moving from 1440p to 4K at High settings?

A: The average FPS at 2560x1440 High is 138 FPS, while at 3840x2160 High it drops to 92 FPS. This represents a decrease of 46 FPS, or about 33%, when moving to the higher resolution.

Q: What is the best-case scenario for minimum FPS in the dataset?

A: The highest recorded minimum FPS is 174, observed at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, where the average FPS is 205 and the maximum is 236.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-9500?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, which is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-9500, which has an average score of 13452.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking compared to all other GPUs in the benchmark database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 falls into the 58th percentile when compared to all GPUs, indicating it performs better than a majority of the tested graphics cards.

Q: At which resolution and settings is the average FPS highest?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 245, which is achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications and benchmark data provide strong evidence for its role in the high frame rates observed. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large memory pool and high bandwidth are critical for handling the texture and geometry data at higher resolutions like 4K, preventing bottlenecks that could otherwise limit performance.

The card's clock speeds are also noteworthy. The base clock is set at 1900 MHz, with a game clock of 2041 MHz and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. These figures, combined with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, allow the GPU to maintain high throughput. Its benchmark scores confirm its capability; a Passmark G3D score of 20974 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 place it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows the GPU is more than capable of driving the frame rates seen in the game, even at the most demanding settings.

The GPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals is particularly telling. It is positioned just behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has an average score of 16129 and a -1.7% deltaPct. This indicates the RX 7700 is only 1.7% slower than that comparable card in synthetic benchmarks. However, the measured FPS in Dave The Diver are exceptionally high, suggesting that the game is not pushing the GPU to its absolute limit. The combination of a large memory buffer and high clock speeds ensures that the GPU can handle the game's art style and effects without becoming the limiting factor, especially when the CPU is keeping up with frame generation.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i3-12100F, despite its budget-oriented "i3" designation, provides a surprisingly strong foundation for this high-performance GPU. With 4 cores and 8 threads, its architecture is Alder Lake, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The base clock of 3.30 GHz can boost up to 4.30 GHz, which is a substantial frequency for a quad-core part. This high boost clock is crucial for gaming, as it allows for strong single-threaded performance, which is often the primary driver of FPS in many titles.

The CPU's benchmark scores illustrate its capabilities. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1674 and multi-core score of 11860 are robust figures. The Geekbench single-core score of 1932 and multi-core score of 7252 further confirm its strength. While it is not a high-core-count processor, its efficiency and clock speed allow it to provide a stable stream of frames to the GPU. The data shows that the CPU's performance is competitive, with its average benchmark score of 13494 placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs.

The i3-12100F's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-9500, a 6-core processor, and the Intel Core 7 1250U. The fact that the i3-12100F is 0.3% ahead of the i5-9500 in average benchmark score demonstrates that newer architecture and higher clock speeds can compensate for fewer physical cores. In the context of Dave The Diver, a game that is not heavily threaded, the CPU's strong single-threaded performance ensures it can keep up with the RX 7700's output. The result is a balanced system where the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU, allowing the graphics card to operate at its full potential and deliver the high frame rates seen in the measured data.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Dave The Diver, the pairing of the Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 secures a rank of 1261 out of 2867 total combos. This places the setup in the 56th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it performs better than more than half of the configurations recorded. This is a strong showing, particularly given the CPU's position as a lower-tier part in Intel's lineup.

This ranking suggests that the combination is well-balanced for this specific game. The GPU's high performance is not being wasted, and the CPU is sufficient to feed it with data, resulting in a frame rate that is competitive with a large portion of the user base. The rank reflects the system's ability to produce high average FPS, which is the primary metric for this ranking. It indicates that while there are many more powerful combinations, this setup delivers an experience that is firmly in the upper half of the performance spectrum, making it a viable option for smooth gameplay.

The position of this combo, at 1261 out of 2867, also implies that there is headroom for improvement. Systems with more powerful CPUs or GPUs will naturally rank higher. However, the data shows that this combo's performance is not an outlier on the low end. Instead, it represents a solid mid-to-high tier configuration that can handle the game's demands without issue. The high FPS numbers, which we will explore shortly, substantiate this ranking and show that in practice, the system delivers a fluid and responsive gaming experience.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the user's display resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, the system is so powerful that even Ultra settings produce an average of 162 FPS. This is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate found on many gaming monitors, making Ultra the clear choice for a maximum visual experience without sacrificing smoothness. For those with a 240 Hz display, dropping to Medium settings yields an average of 205 FPS, which is a better match for that high refresh rate.

At 2560x1440, the same logic applies. Ultra settings still deliver an excellent average of 122 FPS, which is perfect for a 120 Hz or 144 Hz monitor. High settings increase this to an average of 138 FPS, providing a bit more headroom. For a 165 Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, Medium settings, with an average of 154 FPS, would be the preferred choice to maximize the display's potential. The data shows that the system can comfortably handle the demands of 1440p at high visual fidelity.

For 3840x2160 (4K), the GPU, not the CPU, becomes the primary factor. Ultra settings produce an average of 82 FPS, which is playable but may not be ideal for competitive play. High settings are the sweet spot here, delivering an average of 92 FPS and providing a more consistent experience. This is a good balance for a 4K 60 Hz display, offering a significant visual upgrade over lower settings while maintaining a frame rate that is well above the display's refresh rate. Medium settings push the average FPS to 103, which is even safer for maintaining a stable 60 FPS minimum.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the system's performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptionally high. The Low preset yields an average of 245 FPS, which is the highest recorded in the dataset. Medium settings see a drop to an average of 205 FPS, with a minimum of 174 and a maximum of 236, showing a tight and consistent frame delivery. High settings average 183 FPS, and Ultra settings, while the most demanding, still maintain a very high average of 162 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive. The Low preset averages 185 FPS, which is a significant step down from 1080p but still remarkably fast. Medium settings average 154 FPS, with a minimum of 131 and a maximum of 178. This consistency is noteworthy, as the minimum frame rate is still well above 60 FPS. High settings produce an average of 138 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain a strong average of 122 FPS. These numbers show that the system is fully capable of providing a high-refresh-rate experience at 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the performance is still very good, though the scaling becomes more apparent. The Low preset averages 124 FPS, demonstrating the GPU's raw power. Medium settings average 103 FPS, with a minimum of 88 and a maximum of 119, indicating that even in the most demanding scenes, the frame rate stays comfortably in the high 80s. High settings produce an average of 92 FPS, and Ultra settings yield an average of 82 FPS. The data shows a clear progression, with each increase in settings or resolution resulting in a predictable and smooth decrease in average FPS, with no unexpected drops or instability.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights into the system's bottleneck. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average FPS is 183. When the resolution is increased to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 138, a decrease of 45 FPS. This is a significant drop, but it is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. The GPU is working harder to render more pixels, and the frame rate adjusts accordingly. However, the fact that the FPS is still so high at 1440p suggests the CPU is not the primary limiting factor.

The scaling becomes even more pronounced when moving to 4K. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 92. This represents a further drop of 46 FPS from the 1440p result. The percentage decrease from 1080p to 4K is roughly 50% (from 183 FPS to 92 FPS). This halving of the frame rate when quadrupling the pixel count is a classic sign of a GPU-bound workload. The CPU is capable of generating frames faster, but the GPU's rendering capabilities are being saturated by the sheer number of pixels.

This data implies that the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the definitive limiting component at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU can keep up, and the GPU has extra headroom, resulting in exceptionally high frame rates. As the resolution climbs, the GPU's workload increases proportionally, and the frame rates scale down accordingly. The consistent and predictable drops in FPS suggest a well-balanced system where the CPU's performance does not introduce a bottleneck, allowing the GPU's capabilities to be the sole determinant of the final frame rate. This is the ideal scenario for a gaming PC, as it allows for easy optimization by adjusting resolution and settings to match the display's capabilities.