Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 364 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 167 | 196 | 225 | 265 |
| 1440p QHD | 279 | 328 | 379 | 447 |
| 1080p Full HD | 404 | 479 | 548 | 648 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers an exceptionally strong showing in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, a title that demands high frame rates for competitive play. The combination ranks 928th out of 1605 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems evaluated, though its raw FPS output across all tested resolutions and settings suggests it sits near the top of the practical performance envelope for this game.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 928 out of 1605 places it in the 58th percentile of all tested combinations. This is a respectable position, but it undersells the actual experience in CS:GO, where the lowest average FPS recorded across any resolution/settings pair was 167.4 (at 4K Ultra). The rank reflects the broad field of competing hardware, yet the data shows this pairing consistently clears the high-refresh-rate thresholds that competitive players target. At 1080p, the lowest setting tested (Ultra) still produces an average of 403.9 FPS, while the highest (Low) reaches 647.7 FPS. The i7-12700KF’s synthetic benchmarks reinforce this: its avgBenchmarkScore of 35355 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i5-14400 (deltaPct 0.1) and Intel Core i9-12900HX (deltaPct 0.2). This CPU-centric strength explains why the combo overperforms its raw rank in a game that is heavily dependent on processor performance.
GPU Role
The RTX 4060’s role in CS:GO is secondary to the CPU, but it still provides substantial headroom. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and boost clocks up to 2460 MHz. Its 3072 shading units and 48 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s. In synthetic testing, the card scores an avgBenchmarkScore of 23181, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon RX 6600M (deltaPct -0.6) and the Intel Arc B580 (deltaPct 0.7). The GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is more than sufficient for CS:GO’s modest visual demands. Notably, the GPU’s percentile (66th) is well below the CPU’s (89th), indicating that the processor is the more dominant component in this pairing. Evidence of this appears in the 4K results: at 4K Ultra, the combo drops to 167.4 FPS, but at 4K Low it jumps to 264.7 FPS, showing that even at 4K the GPU is not a bottleneck—the settings change alone accounts for a 97.3 FPS swing.
CPU Role
The i7-12700KF is the primary driver of CS:GO performance. With 12 cores (20 threads) based on Alder Lake architecture, it runs at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boosts to 5.00 GHz. The CPU’s 25 MB of shared L3 cache and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory (dual-channel) make it highly responsive to the game’s single-thread and multi-thread workloads. Its Cinebench R23 scores of 28979 multi-core and 4091 single-core demonstrate this balance. The single-core performance is critical for CS:GO’s main game logic, while the multi-core capability handles background tasks and map rendering. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 89 and its avgBenchmarkScore of 35355 put it in elite company, just 0.1% ahead of the i5-14400 and 0.2% ahead of the i9-12900HX. This strength directly translates to the measured FPS: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 647.7 FPS, which is 43.8% higher than the 1080p High result of 478.8 FPS. The fact that dropping settings from High to Low at 1080p yields such a massive increase indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than the GPU must render at higher settings, a hallmark of CPU-bound scenarios in this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1080p, the results are exceptional across all settings. Low produces 647.7 FPS, Medium 548 FPS, High 478.8 FPS, and Ultra 403.9 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 243.8 FPS, showing that settings have a profound impact. At 1440p, the same pattern holds but at lower absolute numbers: Low hits 447.1 FPS, Medium 378.8 FPS, High 328.3 FPS, and Ultra 278.5 FPS. The drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low is 200.6 FPS, a 31% reduction. At 4K, the values compress further: Low yields 264.7 FPS, Medium 225.3 FPS, High 196.3 FPS, and Ultra 167.4 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 167.4 FPS is still above 165 Hz, which is the refresh rate of many high-end monitors. Throughout all settings, the data shows no instance where the combo falls below playable frame rates, even at the most demanding 4K Ultra preset. The consistent gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution (approximately 243.8 FPS at 1080p, 168.6 FPS at 1440p, and 97.3 FPS at 4K) suggests a linear relationship between settings and FPS, with diminishing absolute differences as resolution increases.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear pattern of CPU-bound behavior. At Low settings, FPS drops from 647.7 at 1080p to 447.1 at 1440p (a 31% reduction) and then to 264.7 at 4K (a 59% reduction from 1080p). At Ultra settings, the drops are less severe in percentage terms: from 403.9 at 1080p to 278.5 at 1440p (31% reduction) and 167.4 at 4K (58.5% reduction). The similarity in percentage drops across settings—around 31% from 1080p to 1440p and 58-59% from 1080p to 4K—indicates that resolution scaling is consistent regardless of quality preset. This consistency points to the GPU becoming more involved at higher resolutions, but the CPU still provides a high floor. The 4K Low result of 264.7 FPS compared to the 4K Ultra result of 167.4 FPS shows that even at 4K, the GPU is not saturated; the settings change accounts for a 97.3 FPS difference, which is larger than the entire FPS range of many other games at 4K. The limiting component shifts from being almost purely CPU-bound at 1080p Low to a more balanced state at 4K Ultra, but even then, the CPU’s strength ensures the GPU never becomes a severe bottleneck.
FAQ
Q: Is the RTX 4060 powerful enough for CS:GO at 4K?
A: Yes, the data shows the combo achieves 167.4 FPS at 4K Ultra and 264.7 FPS at 4K Low, both above the 144 Hz threshold for most high-refresh monitors.
Q: How much does the CPU matter for this game?
A: The i7-12700KF’s 89th percentile ranking and 35355 avgBenchmarkScore indicate it is the dominant component, as evidenced by the 243.8 FPS difference between 1080p Low and Ultra settings.
Q: What is the best settings preset for competitive play?
A: At 1080p Low, the combo produces 647.7 FPS, the highest recorded result, which is ideal for maximizing frame rates in competitive scenarios.
Q: How does this combo compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The CPU is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14400 and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900HX, while the GPU is 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6600M and 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
Q: Does the GPU bottleneck at any resolution?
A: No, even at 4K Ultra the combo maintains 167.4 FPS, and the 97.3 FPS difference between 4K Low and Ultra shows the GPU still has headroom.
Q: What is the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K?
A: At Low settings, FPS drops from 647.7 to 264.7 (a 59% reduction), while at Ultra it drops from 403.9 to 167.4 (a 58.5% reduction), showing consistent scaling.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 264.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 225.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 196.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 167.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 447.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 378.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 328.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 278.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 647.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 548.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 478.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 403.9 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.