Counter-Strike 2
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 384 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 141 | 179 | 238 | 286 |
| 1440p QHD | 244 | 321 | 426 | 512 |
| 1080p Full HD | 375 | 480 | 639 | 771 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers exceptional performance in Counter-Strike 2, ranking 3rd out of 1,632 tested combinations. This places the combo in the top 0.2% of all systems tested, with the CPU holding a 93rd percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU at the 94th percentile among all graphics cards. The measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings presets confirm that this pairing is built for extreme high-refresh-rate competitive play.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS measured for this combo in Counter-Strike 2?
A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 770.8 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This drops to 178.7 FPS at 4K (3840x2160) with High settings, showing a 4.3x difference between the most and least demanding tested configurations.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in Counter-Strike 2?
A: The combination ranks 3rd out of 1,632 total tested combos, placing it in the top 0.2% of all systems evaluated. This is consistent with the CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 94th percentile rankings against their respective peers.
Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440 resolution, Low settings produce 511.8 FPS average, while Ultra settings produce 244.4 FPS average. This represents a 267.4 FPS difference, or roughly a 2.1x performance gap between the lowest and highest quality presets.
Q: Does the RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM matter for Counter-Strike 2?
A: The 32 GB GDDR7 memory capacity is far beyond what Counter-Strike 2 requires, and the game's performance is more strongly dictated by the GPU's raw compute capabilities. The 512-bit memory bus and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth contribute to the high frame rates, but the VRAM capacity itself is not a limiting factor in this title.
Q: How does the i5-14600K single-core performance relate to Counter-Strike 2 results?
A: The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 4,642 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for Counter-Strike 2's engine. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample multi-threaded headroom, though the game's frame rates are more dependent on single-thread throughput.
Q: What is the performance delta between the i5-14600K and its nearest CPU rival?
A: The i5-14600K averages 49,166 in benchmark scores, sitting 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and 0.9% behind the AMD EPYC 4345P. The Intel Core i5-14600KF is 0.4% faster, while the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H trails by 1%.
How This Combo Ranks
The data places this specific combination at rank 3 out of 1,632 tested combos in Counter-Strike 2, which represents the 99.8th percentile of all systems evaluated. This exceptional positioning is unsurprising given the component-level metrics: the i5-14600K sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, and the RTX 5090 reaches the 94th percentile among all GPUs.
The GPU's average benchmark score of 84,306 places it 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6600, while trailing the NVIDIA CMP 40HX by 1.6%. On the CPU side, the i5-14600K's average score of 49,166 shows a tight grouping with its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X at 49,062 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i5-14600KF at 49,367 (0.4% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 4345P at 49,595 (0.9% ahead).
This rank of 3 out of 1,632 means the combination is effectively at the bleeding edge of what is currently achievable in this game. The measured FPS data reinforces this, with even the most demanding tested configuration—4K Ultra—producing 141.1 FPS average, which is well above the refresh rates of most high-end displays.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 brings substantial specifications to Counter-Strike 2: 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and boosts to 2407 MHz, with 21,760 shading units and 176 ROPs. Its 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is complemented by 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, though Counter-Strike 2's raster-focused rendering does not heavily utilize ray tracing features.
The GPU's role in this title becomes evident when examining the FPS scaling across resolutions. At 1920x1080 Low, the GPU produces 770.8 FPS, which is 2.7x higher than the 286.2 FPS at 3840x2160 Low. This scaling factor is slightly less than the 2.25x pixel count difference between 1080p and 4K, indicating that the GPU is not purely pixel-bound at lower resolutions—CPU overhead begins to factor in.
At 4K Ultra, the 141.1 FPS result shows the GPU being pushed to its limits, but the 178.7 FPS at 4K High suggests that even at this resolution, there is headroom. The GPU's 94th percentile ranking and its average benchmark score of 84,306—which is 0.1% above the RTX 5090 D and 1.3% above the Radeon PRO W6600—confirm that this is one of the fastest graphics cards available for this workload.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data spans three resolutions and four quality presets, yielding twelve distinct data points. At 1920x1080, the results range from 770.8 FPS (Low) to 375.1 FPS (Ultra), with Medium at 638.7 FPS and High at 479.9 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a 2.1x performance penalty for maximum quality, though even Ultra remains above 375 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers drop but remain exceptionally high: Low produces 511.8 FPS, Medium 426.4 FPS, High 321.1 FPS, and Ultra 244.4 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings costs roughly 34-36% of performance, consistent across presets.
At 3840x2160, the results are 286.2 FPS (Low), 237.8 FPS (Medium), 178.7 FPS (High), and 141.1 FPS (Ultra). The 4K Ultra figure is 5.5x lower than the 1080p Low figure, which highlights the combined effect of resolution and quality settings. The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in resolution costs approximately 30-40% of frame rate, while each step up in quality costs approximately 20-30%.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides clear guidance on optimal settings configurations. For players with high-refresh-rate monitors (240 Hz or above), the 1920x1080 Medium preset at 638.7 FPS offers the best balance between visual quality and frame rate headroom, as it maintains a significant margin above even the fastest displays while providing better visual fidelity than Low.
For 1440p users, the Medium preset at 426.4 FPS is the recommended choice, as it keeps frame rates well above 360 Hz displays while offering improved image quality over Low. The High preset at 321.1 FPS is also viable, but it reduces the safety margin for competitive play where consistent frame times matter more than average FPS.
At 4K, the Low preset at 286.2 FPS is the only configuration that exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end 4K displays (typically 144-240 Hz). The Medium preset at 237.8 FPS is still sufficient for 240 Hz monitors, but the High preset at 178.7 FPS may cause occasional dips below 144 Hz in demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 141.1 FPS is only recommended for players prioritizing visual quality over competitive performance, as it falls below the refresh rate of many 144 Hz displays.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14600K features 14 cores (likely a hybrid arrangement) and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provide the memory bandwidth necessary for high-frame-rate gaming. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,642 and multi-core score of 32,881 demonstrate strong performance in both metrics.
For Counter-Strike 2, the CPU's single-thread performance is the primary driver of high frame rates, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 770.8 FPS, which is a result of the CPU's ability to feed the GPU efficiently. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is critical here, as the game's engine typically has a few heavily-loaded threads that benefit from maximum clock speed.
The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking among all processors, combined with an average benchmark score of 49,166, puts it in the top tier of gaming CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 49,062 (0.2% behind), while the Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49,367 (0.4% ahead). These tight deltas suggest that the i5-14600K is near the top of what any consumer CPU can offer for this title, and the 3rd place ranking of the overall combo confirms that the CPU is not limiting the RTX 5090's potential in Counter-Strike 2.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Counter-Strike 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 286.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 237.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 178.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 141.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 511.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 426.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 321.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 244.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 770.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 638.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 479.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 375.1 |
Counter-Strike 2 with ii5-14600K + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike 2 with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600K + RTX 5090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.