Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 64 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 38 | 42 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 49 | 54 | 63 | 87 |
| 1080p Full HD | 64 | 76 | 87 | 119 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, but this combination clearly hits a performance ceiling at 4K. The data indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution increases, while the CPU has ample headroom to spare. This pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p or a smooth 60 FPS experience at 1440p, provided settings are managed appropriately.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a predictable and steep performance drop as resolution scales from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 75.6 FPS at 1080p to 53.8 FPS at 1440p, and then plummets to 37.7 FPS at 4K. This represents a roughly 29% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 30% drop from 1440p to 4K. This scaling pattern strongly indicates that the RX 6600 XT is the bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the workload shifts almost entirely onto the GPU.
The trend is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the system achieves 119.3 FPS at 1080p, 86.9 FPS at 1440p, and 61.4 FPS at 4K. Even at the lowest settings, the 4K result barely crosses the 60 FPS threshold, which is a clear sign that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are being saturated. Similarly, at Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 63.5 at 1080p to 48.6 at 1440p and finally to 31.1 at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is the lowest in the entire dataset, highlighting that this resolution and preset combination is not viable for smooth gameplay.
The scaling behavior reveals that the Core i7-13700K is not the limiting factor in this configuration. The CPU's high core count and boost clock provide more than enough processing power to feed the GPU at 1080p, where frame rates are highest. As resolution increases and frame rates drop, the CPU demand decreases, meaning the GPU is working harder while the CPU sits relatively idle. For a builder, the takeaway is that if you prioritize 4K gaming, this GPU will need a significant upgrade, but the CPU is well-positioned for future GPU upgrades without becoming a bottleneck.
Settings Recommendations
Given the measured data, the optimal settings balance depends heavily on your target resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080, the High preset at 75.6 FPS is the best starting point, offering a substantial visual upgrade over Medium (86.8 FPS) while still maintaining a frame rate well above 60. If you have a 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, dropping to Medium or Low will push frame rates to 86.8 and 119.3 FPS respectively, though the visual fidelity will suffer. The Ultra preset at 63.5 FPS is playable but does not provide a smooth enough experience for competitive or fast-paced action, so it is not recommended unless you prioritize image quality over smoothness.
At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 53.8 FPS, which is slightly below the ideal 60 FPS target. The data suggests that Medium settings at 62.7 FPS provide the best experience for this resolution, as it achieves a playable frame rate while retaining a decent level of visual detail. Low settings at 86.9 FPS are excellent for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors, but the visual compromise may be too significant for a game like Control with its atmospheric environments. Ultra at 48.6 FPS is not recommended, as the frame pacing will likely feel inconsistent during intense combat sequences.
For 3840x2160, the situation is more challenging. The Low preset at 61.4 FPS is the only setting that achieves a playable frame rate, and it is the clear recommendation for 4K gaming. Medium at 41.8 FPS and High at 37.7 FPS are both too low for a smooth experience, and Ultra at 31.1 FPS is essentially unplayable. If you want to play at 4K, you must accept Low settings with this GPU, or consider reducing the resolution to 1440p for a better visual experience overall.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo run Control at 4K 60 FPS?*
A: No. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the highest average FPS achieved is 61.4 at Low settings. At Medium, High, and Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 41.8, 37.7, and 31.1 respectively, all below the 60 FPS target.
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU pairing?
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the sweet spot. At High settings, the system averages 75.6 FPS, and at Low settings it reaches 119.3 FPS. 2560x1440 at Medium settings is also viable, averaging 62.7 FPS.
Q: How does the Core i7-13700K compare to its closest rival in CPU benchmarks?
A: The Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 47282. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700KF, scores 47334, which is a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD EPYC 4364P scores 47131, just 0.3% slower, and the Intel Core i9-12900F scores 47081, 0.4% slower.
Q: Is the Radeon RX 6600 XT a strong performer relative to other GPUs?
A: The RX 6600 XT has an average benchmark score of 27985, placing it at the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti with a score of 27956, which is a 0.1% difference, indicating they are nearly identical in performance.
Q: What is the impact of switching from High to Low settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS increases from 53.8 at High to 86.9 at Low, a substantial 33 FPS gain. This makes Low settings ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, while High is better for visual quality if you can tolerate sub-60 FPS.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?
A: No. The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions. The CPU has a high single-thread score of 1136 and a multi-thread score of 12412 in 3DMark tests, which is more than sufficient for this game. The FPS drops are consistent with GPU limitations as resolution increases.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Control, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT ranks at 1234 out of 1636 total combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the rankings, indicating that while it is a functional setup, many other configurations deliver higher frame rates in this title. The low rank is primarily driven by the GPU's performance, as the CPU is a high-end part that ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.
The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU creates a notable imbalance. The CPU's performance is far ahead of what this game requires, while the GPU's capabilities fall short of delivering high frame rates at higher resolutions. This ranking suggests that for Control specifically, the RX 6600 XT is the weak link, and users would see a significant improvement in rank by upgrading the GPU while keeping the same CPU. The 71st percentile GPU ranking versus the 93rd percentile CPU ranking highlights this mismatch. For a builder, this data indicates that if you already own this CPU and want to play Control smoothly at 4K or with higher settings, the GPU is the component that needs attention.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its benchmark performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39000 and a single-core score of 5505. These scores place it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. In the context of Control, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and draw calls, which it does with significant headroom.
The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this pairing. At 1080p Low settings, where the frame rate is highest at 119.3 FPS, the CPU still manages to feed the GPU efficiently. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10717 and max-thread score of 12412 indicate strong multi-threading capabilities, which are useful for modern games that can utilize multiple cores. However, Control is not a heavily CPU-bound title, so the massive multi-threaded performance is not fully utilized. The single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2850, is more relevant for gaming, and it is more than adequate.
The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide fast access to frequently used data, reducing latency. The 125W TDP and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory give builders flexibility, though the benchmark data does not specify memory configuration. Overall, the Core i7-13700K is overkill for Control when paired with an RX 6600 XT, but it ensures that frame rates will not be limited by the processor in this or most other games.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.
At 1920x1080, the system performs best. Low settings average 119.3 FPS, Medium averages 86.8 FPS, High averages 75.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 63.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 55.8 FPS, showing a wide range of performance scaling. This resolution is clearly where the combo shines, offering smooth gameplay across all presets.
At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. Low settings average 86.9 FPS, Medium averages 62.7 FPS, High averages 53.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 48.6 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 38.3 FPS. Here, Medium is the only preset that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS, while High and Ultra fall short.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is severely challenged. Low settings average 61.4 FPS, Medium averages 41.8 FPS, High averages 37.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 31.1 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 30.3 FPS. Only Low settings achieve a playable frame rate, and even that is marginal. The data clearly shows that this resolution is not suitable for this GPU if you want to use higher settings.
Across all resolutions, the scaling from Low to Ultra is consistent, with each preset step costing roughly 10-20% performance. This indicates that the game's settings have a significant impact on GPU load, providing users with clear choices between visual fidelity and frame rate. For the best experience, prioritize Medium settings at 1440p or High at 1080p, and avoid 4K unless you are willing to use Low settings.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-13700K
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 61.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 86.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 62.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 53.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 119.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 86.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 75.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 63.5 |
Control with ii7-13700K + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 6600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-13700K + RX 6600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.