Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 91 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 54 | 60 | 85 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 79 | 89 | 126 |
| 1080p Full HD | 91 | 105 | 118 | 166 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Control with the Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience, but 4K requires careful settings management. The data shows a clear progression from a highly playable 105 FPS average at 1080p High to a borderline 54 FPS at 4K High, indicating that this pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions. The sweet spot for this combo is 1440p Medium or High, where the visual fidelity is high and frame rates remain well above 60 FPS.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide a clear picture of how this combo handles Control’s preset ladder. At 1080p, the Ultra preset still yields a 91 FPS average, which is excellent for a smooth experience, but the jump from High to Ultra costs 14 FPS (from 105 to 91). The Medium preset at 1080p offers a 118 FPS average, representing a 13 FPS gain over High, making it the best choice for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. For most users, the 1080p High preset (105 FPS) is the recommended baseline, as it balances visual quality with performance headroom.
Moving to 1440p, the High preset delivers a 79 FPS average, which is perfectly playable for a single-player action-adventure title. The Medium preset at 1440p produces an 89 FPS average, a 10 FPS improvement over High, and it comes with a recorded minimum of 76 FPS, ensuring a consistent experience. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 69 FPS, which is still playable but begins to show the GPU’s limits. If you prioritize frame rate stability, 1440p Medium is the optimal preset; if you want better visuals without sacrificing too much performance, 1440p High is the recommended choice.
At 4K, the situation becomes more demanding. The High preset only manages a 54 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS target most gamers prefer. The Medium preset at 4K achieves a 60 FPS average with a minimum of 51 FPS, making it the only 4K preset that hits the 60 FPS threshold, though it may dip in heavy scenes. The Low preset at 4K yields an 85 FPS average, which is surprisingly strong, but it comes with a significant visual downgrade. The Ultra preset at 4K falls to 47 FPS, which is not recommended for a smooth experience. Therefore, the best experience per the measured rows is 1440p High for a balanced mix of visuals and performance, with 1080p High as the fallback for maximum smoothness.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the primary driver in this pairing, and its 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for Control at the tested settings. The GPU’s 6144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units are heavily utilized, as evidenced by the FPS scaling with resolution. The boost clock of 1770 MHz, with a base of 1575 MHz, allows the card to maintain high throughput, but the data suggests that memory capacity is not the limiting factor here—rather, it is the raw compute and rasterization power.
The GPU’s 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores are present, but the measured FPS rows do not include ray tracing-specific benchmarks, so their impact on Control’s standard presets cannot be directly assessed. The card’s 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is substantial, and the benchmark results show that it can handle the game’s physics and particle effects well at 1080p and 1440p. At 4K, the GPU’s limitations become apparent, as the FPS drops by roughly 30-40% compared to 1440p, indicating that the RTX 3070 Ti is operating near its maximum capacity at that resolution.
The GPU’s percentile ranking of 75 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29945, places it in the upper mid-range tier. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (0.1% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (0.5% faster), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (0.5% slower). This means the RTX 3070 Ti is essentially on par with these cards in synthetic tests, but in Control, the measured FPS shows that it is capable of high refresh rates at 1080p and solid 60+ FPS at 1440p. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for the game’s textures at 1440p Ultra, but at 4K, the card’s compute limits, not memory, are the bottleneck.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. From 1080p High (105 FPS) to 1440p High (79 FPS), the drop is 26 FPS, or roughly 25%. From 1440p High to 4K High (54 FPS), the drop is 25 FPS, or roughly 32%. This indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, as the CPU (Intel Core i5-14600KF) has ample headroom with its 14 cores and 20 threads.
The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is more gentle, suggesting that the CPU can still feed the GPU adequately, but the jump to 4K exposes the GPU’s limitations. At 1080p Low (166 FPS) versus 1440p Low (126 FPS), the drop is 40 FPS, or 24%. At 4K Low (85 FPS), the drop from 1440p Low is 41 FPS, or 33%. This consistent ~25-33% FPS loss per resolution tier confirms that the RTX 3070 Ti is the primary bottleneck, as the CPU’s performance is not fluctuating relative to resolution.
The Medium preset shows a similar trend: 1080p Medium (118 FPS) to 1440p Medium (89 FPS) is a 29 FPS drop, and to 4K Medium (60 FPS) is another 29 FPS drop. The Ultra preset at 1080p (91 FPS) to 1440p (69 FPS) is a 22 FPS drop, and to 4K (47 FPS) is another 22 FPS drop. This linear degradation across all presets underscores that the GPU is fully saturated at each resolution, and the CPU (which ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs) is not holding back performance. For a 4K experience, users must lower settings to Medium to maintain 60 FPS, while 1440p allows for High or Ultra with playable frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong results across all presets. The Low preset achieves a 166 FPS average, which is exceptionally high and suitable for 165Hz monitors. The Medium preset follows with a 118 FPS average, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 136 FPS, ensuring a stable experience. The High preset drops to a 105 FPS average, which is still well above 60 FPS and provides great visual quality. The Ultra preset yields a 91 FPS average, which is playable but shows a 14 FPS penalty over High, making it less appealing for competitive play.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains respectable. The Low preset produces a 126 FPS average, which is excellent for 1440p gaming. The Medium preset averages 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 103 FPS, providing a smooth experience with only occasional dips. The High preset averages 79 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and ideal for immersive gameplay. The Ultra preset averages 69 FPS, which is still playable but begins to show the GPU’s strain, as the gap between High and Ultra is only 10 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. The Low preset averages 85 FPS, which is surprisingly playable for 4K, but the visual quality is heavily compromised. The Medium preset averages 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS, making it the only 4K preset that maintains a 60 FPS average, though the minimum suggests potential stutters in intense scenes. The High preset averages 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and may feel less fluid. The Ultra preset averages 47 FPS, which is not recommended for a comfortable experience. The data shows that 4K is only viable with the Medium preset, and even then, the minimum FPS of 51 indicates that the GPU is near its limits.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 1339th out of 3720 tested combinations in Control, placing it in the top 36% of all systems. This ranking reflects the RTX 3070 Ti’s upper-midrange position, as it outperforms many older or lower-tier GPUs but falls short of the latest high-end cards. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking (with an average benchmark score of 49394) ensures that it is not a bottleneck, and the nearest rival CPUs—the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (0.3% faster), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (0.4% faster), and Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (0.8% faster)—show that the i5-14600KF is competitive with much more expensive processors.
This high CPU performance allows the RTX 3070 Ti to operate at its full potential, as evidenced by the FPS scaling with resolution. The combo’s rank is primarily determined by the GPU, which sits at the 75th percentile with an average benchmark score of 29945. Its nearest GPU rivals—the RTX 5070 Mobile (0.1% faster), RX 6800 (0.5% faster), and RTX 2080 Ti (0.5% slower)—are all within 1.6% of its synthetic performance, indicating that this combo is in a very tight performance band. In Control, this translates to a system that excels at 1080p and 1440p but struggles at 4K, making it a solid choice for high-refresh-rate gaming rather than 4K ultra settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?
A: The data shows that 1440p is the sweet spot, with the High preset delivering a 79 FPS average and the Medium preset hitting 89 FPS. At 1080p, the combo can push 166 FPS on Low, but 1440p offers a better balance of visual quality and performance.
Q: Can this combo run Control at 4K 60 FPS?
A: Yes, but only with the Medium preset, which achieves a 60 FPS average with a minimum of 51 FPS. The High preset drops to 54 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 47 FPS, so Medium is the only 4K preset that meets the 60 FPS target.
Q: How much performance is lost going from 1080p to 4K?
A: At the High preset, the FPS drops from 105 at 1080p to 54 at 4K, a 51 FPS reduction (roughly 49%). At the Medium preset, the drop is from 118 to 60 FPS, a 58 FPS reduction (roughly 49%). The scaling is consistent, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?
A: The GPU is clearly the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU, which ranks in the 90th percentile, shows no signs of limiting performance, as the FPS drops linearly with resolution increases. The RTX 3070 Ti’s 8 GB VRAM and compute limits are the primary constraints.
Q: How does this combo compare to similar systems?
A: The combo ranks 1339th out of 3720 tested, placing it in the top 36%. The GPU’s nearest rivals, such as the RTX 5070 Mobile and RX 6800, are within 0.5% of its synthetic score, indicating that the RTX 3070 Ti is competitive with these cards in Control.
Q: What settings should I use for a competitive 1080p experience?
A: For maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 1080p delivers a 166 FPS average, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. If you prefer better visuals, the Medium preset at 118 FPS is a strong compromise, offering a 13 FPS improvement over High with a minimum of 101 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 85.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 60.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 126.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 79.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 69.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 166.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 118.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 105.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 91.0 |
Control with ii5-14600KF + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600KF + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.