Control

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB combination delivers a solid, highly playable experience in Control, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and settings. The data shows a system capable of exceeding 60 FPS at 1440p on High settings, while 4K Ultra remains demanding, averaging 45 FPS. The following analysis breaks down the measured results, component roles, and practical recommendations based solely on the provided benchmark data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this system in Control based on the measured data?*

A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 on High settings provides an excellent balance, yielding an average of 77 FPS. This offers a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, performance is demanding. The average frame rates range from 82 FPS on Low to 45 FPS on Ultra. The High preset averages 52 FPS, and Medium averages 58 FPS, indicating that 4K gameplay requires a compromise on settings to achieve consistently smooth performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The benchmark results suggest the GPU is the primary limiting factor. As resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, the average FPS at High settings drops from 102 to 52, a clear indication of increasing GPU load. The CPU, with 10 cores and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, appears capable of feeding the GPU, as frame rates scale consistently with resolution.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset, the measured average FPS is 88. This high frame rate demonstrates that the system has ample headroom at this resolution, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: Does the system maintain playable frame rates at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 87 FPS at 2560x1440 on Medium settings, with a minimum FPS of 74. This indicates a consistently smooth experience with no significant frame drops.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB's performance in this game compare to its overall benchmark standing?

A: The GPU's overall percentile rank is 29, but its measured performance in Control is strong. For instance, it achieves 161 FPS at 1080p Low. This suggests the game is well-optimized for the GPU's architecture, and its real-world gaming performance is more robust than its general benchmark percentile might imply.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. In the context of Control, the CPU's role is to manage game logic, physics, and draw calls, ensuring the GPU is supplied with enough data to render frames efficiently.

The benchmark data suggests that the i5-14400F is not a significant bottleneck in this pairing. The FPS scaling is consistent and directly tied to the resolution, which is a hallmark of a GPU-limited scenario. For example, at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces 161 FPS. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see more similar frame rates across different resolutions, especially at lower settings. Instead, we see a clear drop from 161 FPS at 1080p to 122 FPS at 1440p and 82 FPS at 4K on Low settings, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint.

The CPU's performance metrics, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055, show it is a capable processor. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Intel Core i9-11900, have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with a delta of only 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively. This indicates the i5-14400F provides a level of processing power that is more than adequate for maintaining high frame rates in Control, even when paired with a powerful GPU. The CPU's percentiles and scores indicate it ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, placing it well within the top tier for gaming performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is the primary driver of visual performance in Control. It features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its architecture is Blackwell 2.0, with a boost clock of 2572 MHz. The GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth are critical for handling the game's textures and visual effects at higher resolutions.

The measured FPS data shows a clear and substantial impact of the GPU on performance. As the resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, the frame rate drops significantly across all settings presets. For instance, on High settings, the average FPS falls from 102 at 1080p to 77 at 1440p, and finally to 52 at 4K. This pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering workload increases exponentially with resolution.

At 4K Ultra, the GPU is pushed to its limits, averaging only 45 FPS. This indicates that the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU's compute power are sufficient for high-fidelity 1080p and 1440p gaming but are strained at the highest 4K settings. The GPU's measured performance in this game is notably better than its overall benchmark percentile of 29 would suggest. Its nearest rivals in general benchmarks, such as the AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450, are far less capable, but in Control the RTX 5060 Ti delivers playable frame rates at high resolutions, showcasing its gaming-focused design. The 8 GB of VRAM is a key factor, as it allows for high-resolution textures without exceeding memory limits, which can cause stuttering or texture pop-in.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings for this system depend on the user's priority for visual fidelity versus frame rate. The data provides a clear trade-off at each resolution.

For 1920x1080, the system is very powerful. The Ultra preset averages 88 FPS, which is excellent for most players. However, for those seeking maximum performance for a high-refresh-rate monitor, the High preset at 102 FPS or even the Medium preset at 114 FPS offer significant headroom. The Low preset yields 161 FPS, which is exceptionally high but at a significant visual quality cost. The sweet spot is the High preset, as it offers a substantial improvement over Medium (102 vs 114 FPS is a smaller difference, but the visual gains from High are worth the performance trade-off) while still maintaining a frame rate far above 60.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the clear recommendation. It achieves an average of 77 FPS, which is ideal for smooth and responsive gameplay. The Medium preset is also a strong option, averaging 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, ensuring no drops below the V-sync threshold. The Ultra preset drops to 67 FPS, which is still playable but may not provide a consistently smooth experience during intense scenes. The Low preset at 122 FPS is unnecessary unless chasing maximum refresh rates.

For 3840x2160, achieving a locked 60 FPS is challenging. The High preset averages only 52 FPS. The Medium preset averages 58 FPS, which is closer to the target but still not guaranteed. For a playable 4K experience, the Medium preset is the best balance, offering a higher average FPS (58) than High (52) while retaining more visual quality than Low (82 FPS). The Ultra preset should be avoided at this resolution due to its low 45 FPS average.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB ranks 1094 out of 2888 tested combos for Control. This places it in the top 38% of all tested systems, indicating it is a strong performer.

This ranking is notable given the GPU's low overall benchmark percentile of 29. The high combo rank in this game suggests that the pairing is particularly well-suited for Control's engine and requirements. The CPU's robust single and multi-threaded performance, combined with the GPU's efficient architecture, results in a system that outperforms its general hardware standing. The 10-core CPU ensures that the GPU is not waiting on data, and the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is enough to handle the game's demands at most settings. The data shows that this combo is capable of delivering a high-quality experience, ranking ahead of a majority of other hardware pairings tested. This indicates that users with this setup are getting performance that is significantly better than average, making it a powerful option for playing Control.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data represents the exact average FPS measurements for this system in Control.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: 161 FPS
• Medium: 114 FPS (min 97, max 132)
• High: 102 FPS
• Ultra: 88 FPS

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: 122 FPS
• Medium: 87 FPS (min 74, max 100)
• High: 77 FPS
• Ultra: 67 FPS

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: 82 FPS
• Medium: 58 FPS (min 50, max 67)
• High: 52 FPS
• Ultra: 45 FPS

These figures show a consistent and expected progression. As resolution increases, the average FPS decreases for every settings preset. The performance delta between Medium and High is relatively small at all resolutions, while the jump to Ultra is more demanding. For example, at 1440p, the difference between Medium and High is 10 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is also 10 FPS, showing a linear scaling. At 4K, the difference between High and Ultra narrows to just 7 FPS, but the overall frame rates are much lower, making each setting change more impactful to the overall feel of the game.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is a clear indicator of the system's balance. The data shows a significant scaling factor, particularly at higher settings, which points to the GPU as the main limiting component.

At High settings, the average FPS drops from 102 at 1080p to 77 at 1440p, a 24.5% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K, it drops further to 52 FPS, a 32.5% decrease. The total drop from 1080p to 4K is from 102 to 52 FPS, a reduction of 49%. This halving of performance at 4K is a classic sign of a GPU-bound workload, as the pixel count quadruples, placing a massive load on the rendering hardware.

At Low settings, the scaling is more pronounced. The FPS drops from 161 at 1080p to 122 at 1440p (a 24.2% decrease) and then to 82 at 4K (a 32.8% decrease). The total drop is from 161 to 82 FPS, a 49.1% reduction. This consistent ~50% drop from 1080p to 4K across different presets confirms that the GPU's raw processing power is the bottleneck. The CPU is clearly able to keep up, as the frame rates are not plateauing at lower resolutions; they are scaling directly with the GPU's rendering load.

This behavior indicates that users with this combo are fully utilizing their GPU at all resolutions. The system is well-balanced at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the GPU's performance limits are reached, especially on higher presets. The data suggests that to improve 4K performance, a GPU with more processing power would be the primary upgrade path, as the CPU has ample headroom to support it.