Control

Control on this platform is a demanding title, and the pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400F with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti produces a specific set of performance characteristics. This combination ranks in the 2090th position out of 3720 tested combos for this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The data indicates a system that is consistently capable of playable frame rates at 1080p, but one that requires careful settings management as resolution increases.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 2090 out of 3720 places this configuration in the 56th percentile of all tested pairings for Control. This suggests that while the system is far from the top tier, it is not a low-end performer either. The ranking is a product of the balance between the CPU's processing power and the GPU's rendering capabilities. The CPU holds a percentile of 73 among all tested processors, indicating it is a relatively strong component. In contrast, the GPU's percentile is 58 among all tested graphics cards, making it the more limiting factor in this pairing's performance ceiling. The data shows a system where the GPU is likely the primary constraint in achieving higher frame rates, especially at higher resolutions where the graphics card's workload increases significantly. The overall rank reflects a system that is well-suited for 1080p gaming and can handle 1440p with adjustments, but it will not compete with high-end configurations in this specific title.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is equipped with 11 GB of GDDR5X memory on a 352-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 484.4 GB/s. This substantial memory capacity is a significant asset for Control, a game that features complex textures and environments. The GPU's base clock is 1481 MHz with a boost clock of 1582 MHz. These clocks, combined with the high memory bandwidth, directly influence the frame rates seen in the measured data. For instance, at 1080p with Medium settings, the system achieves an average of 95 FPS, indicating the GPU has enough headroom to handle the game's rendering demands at that resolution. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra settings across all resolutions shows a clear pattern: the GPU's workload increases with each preset, and the average FPS drops accordingly. At 4K with Ultra settings, the average FPS falls to 37, demonstrating that the GTX 1080 Ti, while still a capable card, is stressed by the combination of high resolution and maximum graphical fidelity. The GPU's benchmark scores, such as a Passmark G3D score of 18600, provide a synthetic reference point that aligns with these real-world game results.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the most consistent resolution, with average frame rates ranging from 73 FPS on Ultra to 133 FPS on Low settings. This resolution provides the highest performance and smoothest experience.

Q: How does the GTX 1080 Ti's 11 GB of VRAM affect performance?

A: The 11 GB VRAM capacity is a strong asset for Control, as it provides ample memory for the game's high-resolution textures knobs. This is reflected in the ability to maintain an average of 43 FPS at 4K High settings, a scenario where a card with less VRAM might struggle.

Q: Is the i5-12400F a bottleneck for this GPU?

A: The CPU's performance metrics, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and a single-core score of 1680, suggest it is not the primary bottleneck. The consistent FPS drops when increasing resolution or settings point to the GPU as the limiting component.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system delivers an average of 72 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS. This represents a balanced setting for smooth gameplay at this resolution.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to other systems?

A: This pairing is ranked 2090 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the lower-middle tier, meaning there are many faster systems, but it also outperforms a significant portion of the tested configurations.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Control?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K with High settings, the average FPS is 43, which is playable for some, but not ideal for fast-paced action. To achieve a higher frame rate at 4K, you would need to use Low settings, which yields an average of 68 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities across three resolutions and four graphics presets. At 1920x1080, the system shows strong performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 133. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 95 FPS, with a minimum of 80 and a maximum of 109 FPS. High settings yield an average of 84 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still produces an average of 73 FPS. At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings produce an average of 101 FPS. Medium settings deliver an average of 72 FPS, with a minimum of 61 and a maximum of 82 FPS. High settings average 64 FPS, while Ultra settings average 55 FPS. At the highest resolution, 3840x2160, the system's limits are more apparent. Low settings achieve an average of 68 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 48 FPS, with a minimum of 41 and a maximum of 56 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 43 FPS, and Ultra settings average 37 FPS. These numbers illustrate a predictable performance curve, with the GPU's workload being the primary factor in the FPS differences between presets and resolutions.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This CPU's performance is well-documented in its benchmark scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 12380, and its single-core score is 1680. In the context of Control, these scores indicate a processor that is more than capable of feeding the GTX 1080 Ti with data. The game is known to be GPU-intensive, and the data supports this. The FPS differences between the Low and Ultra presets are substantial, but the CPU's role in these differences is minimal. The processor's percentile rank of 73 among all CPUs suggests it is a strong performer. The nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047, show a delta of 0%, indicating the i5-12400F is on par with other mid-range processors. The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide a solid foundation for gaming, ensuring that it does not hold back the GPU in this specific title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's priority for frame rate versus visual fidelity. For the smoothest experience at 1080p, the Medium preset offers an excellent balance, with an average of 95 FPS and a minimum of 80 FPS. This ensures that the frame rate rarely drops below a level that would cause noticeable stutter. The High preset at 1080p, with an average of 84 FPS, is also a strong choice for those who prefer better visuals without sacrificing much performance. At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, as it maintains an average of 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS. This provides a solid experience for a higher resolution. The High preset at 1440p, with an average of 64 FPS, is acceptable for slower-paced gameplay but may be less ideal for action-heavy sequences. For 4K gaming, the Low preset is the only one that provides a consistently high frame rate, with an average of 68 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K, with an average of 48 FPS, is playable but may be too inconsistent for competitive play. The data clearly indicates that the Medium preset is the "sweet spot" for this system, providing a significant visual improvement over Low while keeping frame rates within an acceptable range.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is significant and highlights the GPU's role as the primary limiting factor. At Medium settings, the average FPS scales from 95 at 1920x1080 to 72 at 2560x1440, and then to 48 at 3840x2160. This represents a 24% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 33% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The pattern is consistent across other presets. At High settings, the average FPS is 84 at 1080p, 64 at 1440p, and 43 at 4K. This scaling behavior is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's performance is sufficient to keep up with the GPU's output at all resolutions, as the FPS drops are proportional to the increase in pixel count and rendering complexity. The GTX 1080 Ti's 11 GB of VRAM and 484.4 GB/s of bandwidth are enough to handle the data, but the raw compute power of the GP102 chip is what limits the frame rate at higher resolutions. The data suggests that for this system, reducing resolution is a more effective way to gain performance than adjusting individual settings, as the GPU is the clear bottleneck.