Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
64
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 64 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 39 41 59
1440p QHD 48 55 62 92
1080p Full HD 65 74 82 119

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 59
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 High 39
3840x2160 Ultra 36
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 62
2560x1440 High 55
2560x1440 Ultra 48
1920x1080 Low 119
1920x1080 Medium 82
1920x1080 High 74
1920x1080 Ultra 65

Control with AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT delivers a playable experience in Control, but the data clearly indicates that the graphics card is the primary bottleneck, particularly at higher resolutions. This combination ranks in the 25th percentile of tested combos for this title, and the frame rate scaling across settings confirms that CPU headroom is abundant while GPU load dictates performance.

Settings Recommendations

For a 1080p display, the Low preset delivers the most responsive experience, achieving an average of 119.2 FPS. This is the only setting tier that approaches high-refresh-rate territory. If visual fidelity is a priority, the High preset at 74.2 FPS provides a smoother experience than Medium (82.4 FPS) and Ultra (64.5 FPS), but the jump from Low to High costs 45 FPS. The Ultra preset at 64.5 FPS is the least advisable choice at this resolution, as it offers marginal visual gains over High while sacrificing nearly 10 FPS.

At 1440p, the Low preset remains the standout option with 91.6 FPS, keeping the experience comfortably above 60 FPS. The High preset at 54.6 FPS and Medium at 62.3 FPS both fall short of a locked 60 FPS, while Ultra drops to 48.1 FPS. Given that the gap between Low and Medium is 29.3 FPS, users targeting smooth motion should stay on Low. For those prioritizing image quality over frame rate, High is preferable to Ultra because it maintains a playable average.

At 4K, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The Low preset leads with 58.7 FPS, which is tantalizingly close but still short of the target. Medium (40.5 FPS), High (38.7 FPS), and Ultra (36.1 FPS) are all in the 36–41 FPS range, making them suitable only for slower-paced exploration rather than combat-heavy sequences. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo requires accepting either Low settings or a sub-40 FPS experience.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 6600 XT features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. With a boost clock of 2589 MHz and a game clock of 2359 MHz, the card has a solid foundation for 1080p gaming. However, the benchmark results indicate that this GPU is the limiting factor in Control. The frame rate drops of 45.0 FPS between Low and Ultra at 1080p, and 43.5 FPS at 1440p, are direct consequences of GPU rendering load.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at all tested settings, but the 4K results tell a different story. At 3840x2160, the difference between Low (58.7 FPS) and Ultra (36.1 FPS) is 22.6 FPS, a smaller relative gap than at lower resolutions. This compression suggests that the GPU is hitting a memory bandwidth or compute ceiling even on Low settings, as the pixel throughput demand of 4K overwhelms the card’s 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The card’s 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 165.7 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply insufficient for 4K Ultra in this title.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. Its 128 MB of shared L3 cache provides substantial headroom for gaming workloads. In Control, the CPU is never the bottleneck. The evidence is the consistent frame rate scaling across resolutions: at Low settings, the average FPS rises from 58.7 at 4K to 91.6 at 1440p and 119.2 at 1080p. If the CPU were limiting, these numbers would cluster closer together.

The CPU’s synthetic benchmark scores reinforce this conclusion. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 59712 and single-core score of 8430 place it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF, trails by 2.2% in average benchmark score. This processing power means that at 1080p Low, where the GPU is least stressed, the CPU can feed frames at 119.2 FPS without breaking a sweat. The 16-core configuration is overkill for Control, but it ensures that frame rates are purely GPU-bound in every scenario.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination ranks 1220th out of 1636 tested combos in Control, placing it in the bottom 25% of all pairings. This low ranking is almost entirely attributable to the GPU. The RX 6600 XT sits in the 71st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27985. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, is virtually identical with a deltaPct of 0.1%, meaning the RX 6600 XT offers no meaningful performance advantage over a card from two generations prior. The RTX 3070, by contrast, is 0.9% faster, which is a negligible difference in synthetic tests but could translate to a few extra frames in real games.

The CPU, however, is a top-tier component. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D’s average benchmark score of 71660 places it well above its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (1.8% slower) and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (0.9% faster). This pairing represents a significant mismatch: a flagship-class processor paired with a mid-range graphics card. The result is that the combo’s ranking in Control reflects the GPU’s limitations, not the CPU’s capabilities.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting component. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 119.2 at 1080p to 91.6 at 1440p (a 23.2% reduction) and then to 58.7 at 4K (a 35.9% reduction from 1440p). This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where each pixel doubling increases the rendering workload exponentially.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is less pronounced but still evident: 64.5 FPS at 1080p, 48.1 FPS at 1440p, and 36.1 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 44.0%, which is smaller than the 50.8% drop at Low settings. This compression occurs because the GPU is already near its limits at 1080p Ultra, so the additional resolution scaling has diminishing impact. The data suggests that users should target 1080p for the best experience, as the performance penalty for 1440p is substantial and 4K is only viable at Low settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Control at 4K 60 FPS?*

A: No. The highest average at 3840x2160 is 58.7 FPS on Low settings. Medium (40.5 FPS), High (38.7 FPS), and Ultra (36.1 FPS) all fall well short of 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming?

A: Low settings provide the highest average FPS at 119.2, which is the only preset that exceeds 100 FPS. High (74.2 FPS) is the best choice for visual quality without dropping below 60 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for the frame rate in this game?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate scales strongly with resolution and settings, which is characteristic of GPU-bound performance. The CPU’s 16 cores and 5.70 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom.

Q: How does the RX 6600 XT compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 6600 XT has an average benchmark score of 27985, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and 0.9% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: Low settings average 91.6 FPS, while Ultra averages 48.1 FPS. This represents a 43.5 FPS difference, making Ultra less than half as fast as Low.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM cause issues at higher resolutions?

A: At 4K, the frame rate drops significantly even on Low settings (58.7 FPS), suggesting the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is insufficient for the pixel throughput demand, regardless of VRAM capacity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080

  • Low: 119.2 FPS average
  • Medium: 82.4 FPS average
  • High: 74.2 FPS average
  • Ultra: 64.5 FPS average

2560x1440

  • Low: 91.6 FPS average
  • Medium: 62.3 FPS average
  • High: 54.6 FPS average
  • Ultra: 48.1 FPS average

3840x2160

  • Low: 58.7 FPS average
  • Medium: 40.5 FPS average
  • High: 38.7 FPS average
  • Ultra: 36.1 FPS average

The data shows a clear hierarchy: Low settings consistently outperform Medium by at least 18.2 FPS at every resolution, while Medium outperforms High by 8.2 to 9.7 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra narrows as resolution increases, from 9.7 FPS at 1080p to 2.6 FPS at 4K, indicating diminishing returns from the highest preset at higher pixel counts. For the best balance of frame rate and visual quality, High settings at 1080p or Low settings at 1440p are the recommended configurations based on the measured averages.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 4300 MHz
Boost Clock 5700 MHz
TDP 170W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2589 MHz MHz
TDP 160 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 58.7
3840x2160 Medium 40.5
3840x2160 High 38.7
3840x2160 Ultra 36.1
2560x1440 Low 91.6
2560x1440 Medium 62.3
2560x1440 High 54.6
2560x1440 Ultra 48.1
1920x1080 Low 119.2
1920x1080 Medium 82.4
1920x1080 High 74.2
1920x1080 Ultra 64.5

Control with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RX 6600 XT + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + RX 6600 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.