Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
113
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 113 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 67 75 106
1440p QHD 86 99 112 157
1080p Full HD 114 131 148 208

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 106
3840x2160 Medium 75
3840x2160 High 67
3840x2160 Ultra 58
2560x1440 Low 157
2560x1440 Medium 112
2560x1440 High 99
2560x1440 Ultra 86
1920x1080 Low 208
1920x1080 Medium 148
1920x1080 High 131
1920x1080 Ultra 114

Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination delivers a highly capable Control experience, with the data showing that the GPU is the dominant performance driver at every resolution tested. The benchmark results indicate a system that can comfortably handle high refresh rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, while still maintaining playable frame rates at 4K. This pairing ranks in the top 20% of all tested configurations for this title, and the measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern that favors lower resolutions and higher settings headroom.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data shows a classic GPU-bound scaling curve across the three tested resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 208 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops that average to 157 FPS, a 24.5% reduction, and at 4K the average falls to 106 FPS, a 49% reduction from the 1080p Low result. This steep drop-off is a strong indicator that the RX 7900 XT is the limiting component; the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions, but the GPU's workload increases exponentially with pixel count.

The scaling pattern holds across all settings presets. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 131 at 1080p, to 99 at 1440p (a 24.4% drop), and then to 67 at 4K (a 48.8% drop from 1080p). The consistency of this ~24% / ~49% reduction pattern across Low, High, and Medium settings points to a purely resolution-driven bottleneck. The CPU is not becoming a constraint at higher resolutions; rather, the GPU's fill rate and shading capacity are being saturated.

At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 58, which is the lowest recorded figure in the entire dataset. This represents a 44.8% reduction from the 4K High setting, showing that the Ultra preset imposes a significant additional load on the GPU. The gap between 1080p Ultra (114 FPS) and 4K Ultra (58 FPS) is a 49.1% reduction, again confirming that the GPU is the sole performance limiter. The data suggests that this combo is ideal for high-refresh 1440p gaming, and that 4K is viable for those willing to adjust settings away from the maximum preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control if I want high refresh rates?

A: The measured data shows that 1440p is the sweet spot. At Medium settings, the combo produces an average of 112 FPS, and at High settings it maintains 99 FPS. These figures are well above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for high-refresh monitors. At 1080p, the frame rates are even higher (148 FPS on Medium), but the visual clarity gain at 1440p is generally worth the ~24% performance cost.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Control?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K High settings, the average FPS is 67, which is playable. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 58 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. The data indicates that 4K is best approached with the High preset or below; the Low preset at 4K reaches 106 FPS, but that comes with significant visual compromises.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High in terms of performance cost?

A: The performance cost of moving from High to Ultra is substantial. At 1080p, the average FPS drops from 131 to 114, a 13% reduction. At 1440p, the drop is from 99 to 86, a 13.1% reduction. At 4K, the drop is from 67 to 58, a 13.4% reduction. This consistent ~13% penalty across all resolutions suggests that Ultra is a demanding preset that yields diminishing returns for the frame rate hit.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 CPU a bottleneck for the RX 7900 XT in this game?

A: No, the data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p and 4K is consistent and proportional to the increase in pixel count. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates at lower resolutions would plateau, and the drop-off at higher resolutions would be less severe. Since the FPS drops by roughly a quarter when moving from 1080p to 1440p, the GPU is clearly the primary constraint.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the Low and High presets?

A: The difference is significant. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 208 FPS, while High averages 131 FPS, a 37% reduction. At 1440p, the difference is 157 FPS vs. 99 FPS, a 37% reduction. At 4K, the difference is 106 FPS vs. 67 FPS, a 36.8% reduction. This consistent ~37% penalty for High over Low shows that the settings have a major impact on the GPU load.

Q: How does this CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its direct rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25517, which places it within a very tight margin of its nearest rivals. It is 0.1% behind the Intel Xeon D-2752TER and 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, while being 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U. This indicates that its multi-threaded capability is essentially on par with these competing processors.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination holds a rank of 740 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the 80th percentile of all configurations in the database, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of systems tested for this title. The top 20% ranking confirms that this is a high-end pairing capable of delivering excellent performance in this specific game.

Given that the combo rank is a combined measure of CPU and GPU performance, the high ranking is likely driven by the GPU's strong showing. The RX 7900 XT has a percentile rank of 55 among all GPUs, which might seem modest, but its average benchmark score of 13745 is only 0.5% below the AMD Radeon 660M and 0.5% below the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, and it is 1.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT. This suggests the GPU is a solid performer in its class.

The CPU's percentile rank of 78 is higher, indicating that the Ryzen 7 5700 is a stronger component relative to its peers. However, in a game like Control, the GPU is typically the dominant factor for frame rates. The combination of a strong CPU (78th percentile) and a capable GPU (55th percentile) results in a synergistic pairing that ranks in the 80th percentile for the game, suggesting that the system is well-balanced for this workload.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 208. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 148 FPS, with a minimum of 125 and a maximum of 170. The High preset yields an average of 131 FPS, while the Ultra preset produces an average of 114 FPS. The data shows a clear progression: each step up in settings reduces the average FPS by roughly 13-17%, with Ultra being the most demanding.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected decline. The Low preset averages 157 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 112 FPS, with a range of 95 to 128 FPS. High settings yield 99 FPS, and Ultra drops to 86 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, with an average reduction of about 24% across all settings, which is a typical penalty for increasing pixel count by 78%.

At 3840x2160, the system starts to show its limits. The Low preset still manages an average of 106 FPS. Medium settings yield 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 and a maximum of 87. High settings drop to 67 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 58 FPS. The gap between Medium and High at 4K (75 vs. 67 FPS) is 10.7%, while the gap between High and Ultra (67 vs. 58 FPS) is 13.4%. This indicates that the Ultra preset is particularly heavy on the GPU at 4K resolution.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the clear performance driver in this configuration. The GPU has a base clock of 1387 MHz and a boost clock of 2394 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz. The memory operates at 2500 MHz, effectively 20 Gbps, across a 320-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This high bandwidth is crucial for feeding the GPU at 4K resolutions where texture data demands are high.

The GPU's 20 GB of GDDR6 memory is a significant asset for Control. While the game itself may not require that much memory, the capacity ensures that there is no VRAM-related stuttering or texture pop-in, even at 4K Ultra settings. The memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s is sufficient to handle the data throughput required for the game's high-resolution textures and effects, allowing the GPU to maintain its frame rates without being constrained by memory I/O.

The GPU's compute capabilities are also relevant. With 5376 shading units and an FP32 throughput of 51.48 TFLOPS, the RX 7900 XT has ample compute power to handle the physics and rendering effects in Control. The pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s ensure that the GPU can fill the screen with high-detail textures and effects at the tested resolutions. The data confirms that the GPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p and 1440p, and only at 4K Ultra does it reach its performance ceiling.

Settings Recommendations

For players prioritizing high frame rates at 1080p, the Low preset offers the highest average FPS at 208. However, for a balanced experience, the Medium preset at 148 FPS is recommended, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Low while still maintaining frame rates far above 144Hz. The High preset at 131 FPS is also excellent for competitive play, and the Ultra preset at 114 FPS is viable for those who want maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing too much performance.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the best choice for a smooth experience, delivering 112 FPS. The High preset at 99 FPS is also highly playable and offers better visual quality. The Ultra preset at 86 FPS is still above 60 FPS, making it a viable option for gamers who prefer visual quality over raw frame rate. The Low preset at 157 FPS is only recommended for players with 165Hz or higher monitors who want to maximize refresh rate.

At 4K, the settings recommendations change due to the GPU's limits. The High preset at 67 FPS is the optimal choice, as it provides a good balance between visual quality and playability. The Medium preset at 75 FPS is also a strong option, offering slightly higher frame rates with a minor visual compromise. The Ultra preset at 58 FPS is playable but may feel less smooth, and the Low preset at 106 FPS is recommended for players who prioritize frame rate above all else. The data suggests that 4K Ultra is not the ideal sweet spot for this combo, and players should stick to High or Medium for the best experience.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

VRAM 20 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2394 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 106.0
3840x2160 Medium 75.0
3840x2160 High 67.0
3840x2160 Ultra 58.0
2560x1440 Low 157.0
2560x1440 Medium 112.0
2560x1440 High 99.0
2560x1440 Ultra 86.0
1920x1080 Low 208.0
1920x1080 Medium 148.0
1920x1080 High 131.0
1920x1080 Ultra 114.0

Control with Ryzen 7 5700 + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700 + RX 7900 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.