Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
95
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 95 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 49 56 63 89
1440p QHD 72 83 94 132
1080p Full HD 96 110 124 174

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 89
3840x2160 Medium 63
3840x2160 High 56
3840x2160 Ultra 49
2560x1440 Low 132
2560x1440 Medium 94
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Ultra 72
1920x1080 Low 174
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 High 110
1920x1080 Ultra 96

Control with AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT delivers a robust Control experience, characterized by high frame rates across most settings and resolutions. This combination demonstrates a clear performance hierarchy that rewards specific configuration choices, making it a practical option for smooth action-adventure gameplay. The data suggests this combo is best utilized at 1440p, where it provides an excellent balance between visual fidelity and fluid motion, though it also proves highly capable at 1080p for those prioritizing maximum refresh rates.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data reveals a distinct sweet spot for this hardware combination. At 1440p, the High preset produces an average of 83 FPS, which is a substantial improvement over the Ultra preset's 72 FPS while maintaining a high level of visual quality. The transition from High to Ultra costs 11 FPS on average at this resolution, a performance drop that is unlikely to be worth the marginal visual gains in a game like Control, where fast-paced action benefits more from consistent frame pacing than from the highest shadow or reflection details.

For users with 1080p displays, the High preset at 110 FPS is the recommended starting point. It clears the 100 FPS threshold comfortably, providing a very responsive experience. Pushing to Ultra drops the average to 96 FPS, which is still playable but sacrifices the headroom that many players prefer for maintaining stable frame times during intense combat sequences. The Low preset, while delivering a massive 174 FPS at 1080p, strips away too much of the atmospheric lighting and particle effects that define Control's unique visual style, making it a less appealing option for a first playthrough.

At 4K, the situation becomes more nuanced. The High preset averages 56 FPS, which is on the edge of what many consider playable for a single-player action title. Medium settings at 4K yield 63 FPS, a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS, and this is the recommended preset for 4K displays. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 49 FPS, which introduces noticeable judder during camera panning and is not recommended for consistent gameplay. Medium strikes the best balance at this resolution, offering a 14 FPS advantage over Ultra while keeping the visual experience largely intact.

The data pattern suggests that Medium settings offer a particularly efficient performance tier across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium provides 124 FPS, which is 14 FPS higher than High and only 50 FPS lower than Low, demonstrating that the jump from Medium to High is relatively expensive. At 1440p, Medium hits 94 FPS, nearly matching the High preset's 83 FPS but with a 11 FPS advantage. This makes Medium the best choice for users who want to maximize frame rates without resorting to the visual compromises of Low settings.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 7800 XT's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, a configuration that proves more than sufficient for Control at all tested settings. The game's asset streaming and texture loads do not appear to stress this memory subsystem, as evidenced by the consistent frame rates even at 4K Ultra, where memory pressure is typically highest. The 16 GB capacity ensures that there is no texture swapping or stutter, even when the game's environments become dense with debris and supernatural effects.

The GPU's clock behavior is also instructive. With a base clock of 1295 MHz, a game clock of 2124 MHz, and a boost clock of 2430 MHz, the card demonstrates a wide operating range. The benchmark results indicate that the card is spending most of its time near the game clock, as the performance scaling between settings is linear and predictable. The 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and 583.2 GTexel/s texture rate are clearly the driving forces behind the high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, where the card is able to fully saturate its shading units.

The card's 60 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate suggest it is prepared for ray-traced workloads, though the measured data does not include ray tracing results. The 96 ROPs and 233.3 GPixel/s pixel rate are sufficient to handle the post-processing effects and resolution scaling required at 4K. The transition from 1080p to 4K shows a performance drop that is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, indicating that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combination.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this combination ranks 899th out of 2,888 tested combos for Control, placing it in the 69th percentile of all tested systems. This is a strong showing, indicating that this combo outperforms the majority of other hardware pairings in this specific game. The rank of 899 out of 2,888 suggests that while there are many faster configurations, this system delivers a level of performance that will satisfy most players looking for a high-refresh-rate experience.

The CPU's benchmark position provides context for this ranking. The Ryzen 5 5600F sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36,945. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 at 36,938 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D at 37,018 (-0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 at 37,093 (-0.4% delta). These negligible deltas indicate that the 5600F is firmly in a competitive performance tier, offering comparable processing power to these newer alternatives.

The GPU's ranking is more modest, sitting at the 51st percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 11,627. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, scores 11,680 (-0.5% delta), while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M scores 11,528 (0.9% delta). The fact that the combo ranks in the 69th percentile while the GPU is only in the 51st percentile suggests that the CPU is helping to boost the overall gaming performance, showcasing the importance of a balanced system in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves a Low preset average of 174 FPS, a Medium preset average of 124 FPS (with a minimum of 105 FPS and maximum of 142 FPS), a High preset average of 110 FPS, and an Ultra preset average of 96 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 78 FPS, demonstrating that the game's settings have a significant impact on the GPU load at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. The Low preset delivers 132 FPS, Medium achieves 94 FPS (minimum 80 FPS, maximum 108 FPS), High reaches 83 FPS, and Ultra settles at 72 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 60 FPS, a slightly smaller spread than at 1080p, which indicates that the GPU is becoming a more significant bottleneck as resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the performance envelope tightens considerably. The Low preset still manages 89 FPS, but Medium drops to 63 FPS (minimum 54 FPS, maximum 73 FPS), High falls to 56 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 49 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 40 FPS, showing that at 4K, the settings have a relatively smaller impact on the final frame rate because the GPU is already heavily loaded. The minimum frame rates recorded for Medium settings across all resolutions—105, 80, and 54 FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K respectively—indicate that the game maintains consistent frame pacing without significant dips, which is crucial for a title with frequent physics-based combat.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals the system's scaling characteristics. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 110 at 1080p to 83 at 1440p, a 24.5% reduction, and then to 56 at 4K, a further 32.5% reduction from the 1440p figure. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the frame rate scales inversely with the pixel count in a near-linear fashion.

At Low settings, the scaling is more aggressive. The 174 FPS at 1080p drops to 132 FPS at 1440p (24.1% reduction) and then to 89 FPS at 4K (32.6% reduction). The fact that the percentage drops are similar across settings suggests that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are being utilized consistently, regardless of the visual complexity. This is a sign that there is no single bottleneck (such as texture bandwidth or pixel fill) that is being saturated at any particular settings level.

The scaling behavior points to a system that is well-balanced at 1080p and 1440p, but becomes GPU-limited at 4K. At 1080p, the CPU is likely contributing to the high frame rates, as the Ryzen 5 5600F's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU with draw calls. However, as the resolution increases, the GPU's rendering load grows, and the CPU's role diminishes. The 4K results, which show a maximum of 89 FPS even at Low settings, indicate that the RX 7800 XT is the definitive bottleneck at this resolution, and players should not expect to push beyond these figures without reducing resolution or accepting lower settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor with this hardware?

A: The High preset at 1440p delivers an average of 83 FPS, which offers a strong balance of visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset drops to 72 FPS, a 13.2% reduction that is not justified by the marginal visual improvements in most gameplay scenarios.

Q: Can this combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K?

A: Yes, but only with settings adjustments. The Medium preset at 4K achieves 63 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset falls short at 56 FPS, and Ultra drops to 49 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K, Medium settings are required.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600F compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36,945. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, scores 36,938, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018, which is -0.2% relative to the 5600F. These differences are negligible, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: Is the RX 7800 XT's 16 GB of VRAM sufficient for Control?

A: Yes, the measured data shows no indication of VRAM limitations. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth is more than adequate for the game's highest settings, as frame rates remain consistent without stuttering or texture pop-in.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between settings at 1080p?

A: The largest gap is between Low and Medium. Low settings average 174 FPS, while Medium averages 124 FPS, a difference of 50 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is only 14 FPS, and the gap between High and Ultra is also 14 FPS.

Q: Does this combo rank highly among all tested systems in Control?

A: The combo ranks 899th out of 2,888 tested combinations, placing it in the top 31% of systems. This is a strong result, indicating that the Ryzen 5 5600F and RX 7800 XT pairing provides above-average performance for this specific game.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 4000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2430 MHz MHz
TDP 263 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 89.0
3840x2160 Medium 63.0
3840x2160 High 56.0
3840x2160 Ultra 49.0
2560x1440 Low 132.0
2560x1440 Medium 94.0
2560x1440 High 83.0
2560x1440 Ultra 72.0
1920x1080 Low 174.0
1920x1080 Medium 124.0
1920x1080 High 110.0
1920x1080 Ultra 96.0

Control with Ryzen 5 5600F + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RX 7800 XT + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600F + RX 7800 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.