INTEL

Intel Xeon 3.0

Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores

1
Cores
1
Threads
โ€”
GHz Boost
135W
TDP
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธECC Memory

Intel Xeon 3.0 Specifications

โš™๏ธ

Xeon 3.0 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The Intel Xeon 3.0 features 1 physical cores and 1 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
1
Threads
1
SMP CPUs
1
โฑ๏ธ

3.0 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Xeon 3.0 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Xeon 3.0 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
3 GHz
Boost Clock
N/A
Multiplier
15x
๐Ÿ’พ

Intel's Xeon 3.0 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the 3.0 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Xeon 3.0's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
๐Ÿ—๏ธ

NetBurst Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The Intel Xeon 3.0 is built on Intel's 90 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in 3.0 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
NetBurst
Codename
Irwindale
Process Node
90 nm
Foundry
Intel
Transistors
178 million
Die Size
169 mmยฒ
Generation
Xeon (Irwindale)
๐Ÿ”ข

NetBurst Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Xeon 3.0 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Intel 64
VT-x
๐Ÿ”Œ

3.0 Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The Intel Xeon 3.0 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 135W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
135W
๐Ÿ”ง

Intel Socket 604 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Xeon 3.0 uses the Intel Socket 604 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
Intel Socket 604
Package
ยตPGA
DDR5

Intel Socket 604 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the 3.0 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Xeon 3.0 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Bus
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
Supported
๐Ÿ“ฆ

Xeon 3.0 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The Intel Xeon 3.0 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Xeon 3.0 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.

Manufacturer
Intel
Release Date
Feb 2005
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
End-of-life

Xeon 3.0 Benchmark Scores

๐Ÿ“Š

No benchmark data available for this CPU.

About Intel Xeon 3.0

So you're looking at the Intel Xeon 3.0, the single-core powerhouse from 2005. With just one core and one thread, this chip is a pure, straightforward workhorse, but can it even handle modern multitasking? Its base clock is locked at 3.00 GHz, and you won't find any turbo boost technology here; what you see is literally all you get. That 135W TDP is pretty hefty by today's standards, making you wonder about its energy appetite. The cache setup is modest, fitting for its era, but how does that impact real-world performance now? Let's just say the Xeon 3.0 GHz processor was built for a different computing landscape, focusing on raw single-threaded speed for specific server tasks. It's a fascinating piece of tech history that highlights how far we've come.

  • Single-core architecture with no hyper-threading
  • Fixed clock speed of 3.00 GHz, no turbo functionality
  • High thermal design power of 135 watts
  • Manufactured on a 90 nanometer process node
  • Utilizes the legacy Socket 604 interface
  • Part of the Irwindale generation of Xeon CPUs

Diving into its capabilities, the Intel Xeon 3.00 GHz is strictly a single-threaded CPU. This means it processes one instruction stream at a time, which feels incredibly limiting compared to today's multi-core beasts. The lack of a turbo clock means it can't dynamically adjust its speed for demanding moments, so performance is consistently... consistent. You have to question the energy efficiency when a single core consumes 135W; that's a lot of heat and power for one processing unit. The cache hierarchy was designed for the workloads of its time, but would it cause a bottleneck with contemporary applications? This Xeon processor 3.0 was clearly engineered for stability and reliability in a single-threaded world, not for juggling dozens of modern tasks simultaneously.

Speaking of power draw, the energy efficiency of the Intel Xeon (Irwindale) 3.0 is a major point of discussion. With a 90nm process and a 135W TDP, it's not exactly a green chip by any modern measure. How does that compare to a current ultra-efficient processor? You're looking at a design philosophy centered on delivering maximum single-threaded performance, with power consumption as a secondary concern. This makes you appreciate the leaps in semiconductor technology that allow for today's high-performance, low-power chips. The thermal output alone would require robust cooling solutions, which adds to the total cost of ownership. It's a clear reminder of the trade-offs made in that era of processor design.

So, what was the target use case for this classic Xeon? The Intel Xeon 3.0 was aimed squarely at the entry-level server and workstation market of the mid-2000s. Think single-processor systems handling file serving, basic web hosting, or computational tasks that relied on strong single-threaded performance. Would it be viable today? Probably not for anything beyond a legacy system or a retro computing project. Its architecture is a snapshot of a time before multi-core dominance and advanced power management became standard. It served its purpose well for its generation, but technology has decisively moved on to more parallel and efficient designs.

The AMD Equivalent of Xeon 3.0

Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

AMD โ€ข 4 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular Intel Xeon 3.0 Comparisons

See how the Xeon 3.0 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Xeon 3.0 with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs