Intel Pentium SU2700

Intel Pentium SU2700 is a single-core, single-thread mobile processor built on Intel’s 45 nm Penryn architecture, released in June 2009, and now end-of-life. With a base clock of 1300.00 MHz, a 10 W TDP, and a 50th percentile ranking across all CPUs, the data positions this chip as a low-power entry point for basic portable computing, not a performance-oriented part.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for the Intel Pentium SU2700 is sparse: its average benchmark score is 0, and it holds no entries in the benchmark results array. The percentileVsAllCpus field places it at exactly 50, meaning it sits at the median of the entire CPU distribution in the database — but this percentile is derived from a dataset where the chip’s own measured score is effectively null. That combination suggests the 50th percentile reflects its position among all listed parts rather than any meaningful workload result.

Because there are no benchmark scores and no nearestRivals entries, the SU2700’s raw performance cannot be quantified against any specific competitor. The absence of boost clock support means the 1300.00 MHz base frequency is the maximum sustained speed; there is no turbo or dynamic overclocking headroom. With only 1 core and 1 thread, the processor can execute a single instruction stream at a time, which caps its throughput in any parallel workload. The 2 MB L2 cache and 64 KB L1 cache are the only cache levels present; there is no L3 cache, so the memory hierarchy relies entirely on the relatively small on-die caches and the DDR3 memory interface.

In practical terms, the data indicates that the SU2700 is not designed for compute-intensive tasks. A single 1300.00 MHz core with no boost will lag behind any modern multi-core part, and the 50th percentile ranking likely reflects the broad population of processors in the database — many of which are far more capable. Without rival scores, the only defensible statement is that the SU2700’s performance envelope is defined by its single core, low clock, and absence of acceleration features, resulting in a processor that handles light, single-threaded chores but would struggle with anything beyond that.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals list is empty, so there are no direct competitor comparisons available from the FACT PACK. The chip’s position relative to other CPUs can only be inferred from the percentileVsAllCpus value of 50, which is a neutral midpoint — not a strong showing, but not the very bottom of the database either. However, that percentile is not backed by any actual benchmark score, so it should not be read as evidence of competitive performance.

Without rival data, the SU2700’s comparison must be qualitative. Against any modern processor — even low-end mobile chips from later generations — the single core and 1300.00 MHz clock place it at a significant disadvantage. Against other end-of-life ultra-low-power parts from the same era, its 10 W TDP and 45 nm process suggest it was aimed at fanless or passively cooled designs, but the lack of benchmark numbers prevents any numerical delta. The only concrete comparison is internal: the SU2700 has 1 core and 1 thread, while many of its contemporaries in the Pentium Dual-Core family would have had 2 cores — but that detail is not in the FACT PACK for rivals, so it cannot be stated as a comparison. The data simply does not support any rival-specific analysis.

Who Should Consider It

Given the absence of benchmark scores, workload recommendations must be grounded in the architectural facts. The SU2700 has 1 core, 1 thread, and a 1300.00 MHz base clock — this is a processor for tasks that are inherently sequential and do not demand high throughput. Office work such as word processing, spreadsheet entry, and basic email would be within its reach, provided the software is not overly resource-hungry. The 2 MB L2 cache helps with small working sets, and the 10 W TDP implies it can run in a thin-and-light chassis without aggressive cooling.

For gaming, the data is clear: no integrated graphics are specified (only "On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)"), and the single core at 1300.00 MHz would bottleneck even lightweight titles. The processor is not suited for any modern 3D game, and even older 2D games would likely see frame rate limitations due to the single-threaded nature. Creation workloads — video editing, 3D rendering, or large-scale compilation — are out of the question, as these tasks benefit from multiple cores and higher clocks, neither of which the SU2700 offers.

The realistic use case is a secondary or legacy system: a basic netbook or ultraportable for web browsing (simple pages), document viewing, and lightweight productivity. The DDR3 memory support and 45 nm process are period-appropriate, but the end-of-life status means no future software optimizations are expected. Users who need a machine for occasional, low-stakes tasks — not as a primary driver — might find it adequate, but the data offers no evidence of any performance headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the base clock speed of the Intel Pentium SU2700?

A: The base clock is 1300.00 MHz, with no boost clock available.

Q: How many cores and threads does the SU2700 have?

A: It has 1 core and 1 thread.

Q: What is the TDP of this processor?

A: The TDP is 10 W.

Q: Does the SU2700 have integrated graphics?

A: Integrated graphics are available only on certain motherboards as a chipset feature — not as a guaranteed part of the CPU.

Q: What memory type does the SU2700 support?

A: It supports DDR3 memory, but the memory bus width and bandwidth are not specified in the data.

Q: What is the production status of the SU2700?

A: It is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of June 2009.

Q: What is the process node and architecture?

A: It uses a 45 nm process node and the Core 2 architecture (codenamed Penryn).

Power and Thermals

The SU2700 has a TDP of 10 W, which classifies it as an ultra-low-power part. This is a very modest thermal envelope — typical for processors designed for fanless or passively cooled mobile devices, or for systems where battery life is prioritized over performance. The 45 nm process node, while old by modern standards, was efficient enough for this power class at the time of release.

Based on the 10 W TDP, the cooling tier required is minimal. A small heatsink or a thin heatpipe assembly would suffice, and many chassis designs would not need an active fan. The socket is Intel BGA 956, which is a ball-grid array — meaning the processor is soldered to the motherboard, not user-replaceable. This reinforces the intended use case: a fixed, low-power platform where thermal management is designed around the 10 W envelope.

The lack of a boost clock means the processor never exceeds 1300.00 MHz, so peak power draw stays close to the TDP rating. There is no turbo mode to cause thermal spikes, which simplifies cooling design. The 410 million transistors on a 107 mm² die are modest by today’s standards, but the power efficiency of the 45 nm node allowed Intel to keep the TDP at 10 W. For a system builder or user, this means any standard low-profile cooler — even a passive one — is theoretically sufficient, provided the ambient airflow is reasonable. However, the end-of-life status means no new motherboard support is forthcoming, so the thermal solution must be integrated into a legacy platform.