Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
IntelIntel Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Specifications
Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60 features 1 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Pentium 4 HT 2.60 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Pentium 4 HT 2.60 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Pentium 4 HT 2.60 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Pentium 4 HT 2.60's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
NetBurst Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60 is built on Intel's 130 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Pentium 4 HT 2.60 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
NetBurst Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Pentium 4 HT 2.60 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 69W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 478 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Pentium 4 HT 2.60 uses the Intel Socket 478 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 478 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Pentium 4 HT 2.60 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Pentium 4 HT 2.60 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Intel's Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Pentium 4 HT 2.60 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Pentium 4 HT 2.60 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60
The Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60 is a desktop processor built by Intel on the NetBurst architecture, under the Northwood codename. The database places it in the Pentium 4 HT (Northwood) generation. It has one physical core and two threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and no boost clock recorded. The package uses Intel Socket 478. The processor carries a 69 W TDP and was manufactured on a 130 nm process with 55 million transistors and a 131 mm² die. Cache consists of 8 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2; no L3 cache is listed. Memory support is DDR1 and DDR2, ECC memory is false, and integrated graphics are listed as “On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)”. Production status is end-of-life, with a release date of 2003-05-20. The part number SL6WHSL6WS is listed, and the multiplier is not unlocked. The benchmark record is sparse: benchmarks is empty, average benchmark score is 0, percentileVsAllCpus is 50, and nearestRivals is empty.
Who Should Consider It
The structural record points to a narrow workload profile. With 1 core and 2 threads, this processor cannot provide physical-core scalability for software that depends on multiple cores. Instead, it is aligned with single-threaded tasks where the 2.60 GHz base clock is the operating frequency reference. The two threads allow an operating system to see two logical processors on one physical core, which can be useful for task-level overlap but does not double execution capacity.
The data set contains no gaming benchmark scores, no creation-benchmark scores, and no office-productivity scores. That means workload recommendations must remain qualitative. Gaming performance is not measured in the record, creation performance is not measured, and office performance is not measured. The desktop market segment indicates the part was intended for desktop systems. The end-of-life production status and Intel Socket 478 interface place it on a mature platform. Memory support for DDR1 and DDR2 defines the memory environment available to those workloads. Because the multiplier is not unlocked, the recorded frequency relationship is tied to the 2.60 GHz base clock.
For a heavily threaded workload, the data offers no benchmark evidence to support this part. The single physical core is the limiting structural fact. For a system already built around Socket 478 and DDR1/DDR2 memory, and for software that can operate with two logical threads on one core, the structural facts are coherent. The absence of any benchmark entries, however, remains the decisive limitation for any broader recommendation.
Power and Thermals
The only thermal number in the fact pack is 69 W. That TDP is the processor’s thermal design power class. No boost clock is present, so the record contains no separate higher-power turbo state. The physical specifications behind the 69 W figure are the 130 nm process node, the 55 million transistor count, and the 131 mm² die size. The die area provides context for power density: the same thermal envelope is spread across 131 mm².
The socket is Intel Socket 478, which determines the mounting and platform constraints for any cooling solution. The data set does not specify a cooler size, heatsink design, or cooling tier. What can be inferred is limited to the TDP itself: a cooling solution rated for a 69 W TDP class is the appropriate reference point. Because memory support is DDR1 and DDR2, with no memory bus or memory bandwidth values recorded, memory-related thermal load cannot be assessed. ECC memory is listed as false, so ECC memory power behavior is outside the record.
The locked multiplier field is false, meaning the multiplier is not unlocked. As a result, the data does not describe a processor whose frequency ratio can be freely changed through multiplier adjustment. The base clock remains the recorded frequency reference for sustained operation.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmarks array for this processor is empty. The avgBenchmarkScore field is 0, but because no benchmark entries are present, this 0 is not supported by any test results. There are no per-application averages to report. The percentileVsAllCpus field is 50, meaning the processor sits at the midpoint of the all-CPU distribution in this database. However, with no underlying benchmark entries, that percentile cannot be tied to any specific workload or test.
The nearestRivals array is also empty, so no deltaPct values exist. The data set cannot express a statement such as “this CPU is X% faster than a named rival” because no rival is named. The only quantitative performance-related items in the record are structural: the 2.60 GHz base clock, the 1-core/2-thread configuration, the 8 KB L1 cache, and the 512 KB L2 cache. These are specifications, not measured throughput.
Benchmark performance cannot be described as ahead or behind any other part in this database. The 50th percentile value is a coarse positioning signal, but it cannot substitute for missing scores. The record contains no score that can be compared, no rival list to draw deltas from, and no benchmark sample to validate the percentile.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals list is empty. There are no named rivals, no rival scores, and no deltaPct values in the fact pack. Because of that, no head-to-head performance comparison can be written for any specific competitor. The only comparative field that is populated is percentileVsAllCpus, set to 50. That places the processor in the middle of the all-CPU distribution in the database, but without benchmark samples, the percentile is not evidence of tested performance equality or superiority.
The record also identifies the part as a desktop CPU on Intel Socket 478 with end-of-life production status. That context separates it from processors outside the Socket 478 platform, but the database does not supply comparative entries. In the usual comparison framework, a populated nearestRivals list would provide rival names and deltaPct values. Since that list is empty, the data set cannot establish a relative performance rank against any named product.
The 50th percentile remains the only broad ranking signal. It is a database-wide position rather than a measured margin over another CPU. No paragraph can state how this processor performs relative to a specific rival, because no such rival appears in the fact pack.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The processor has one core and two threads. The HT designation in the product name and the threads count of 2 both point to simultaneous multithreading on a single physical core. Because there is only one core, the two threads are logical rather than physical. A single-threaded workload operates through one execution path at the 2.60 GHz base clock. A two-thread workload can attempt to keep more of the core’s resources busy, but both threads share the same execution core.
The cache layout is an 8 KB L1 cache and a 512 KB L2 cache, with no L3 cache listed. Both logical threads share these caches. The absence of an L3 cache means the recorded cache hierarchy stops at 512 KB. The locked multiplier fixes the core frequency ratio, so the base clock is the reference point for both single-threaded and multi-threaded operation.
The data set does not include a benchmark score that quantifies the efficiency of the two-thread arrangement. Structurally, multi-thread scaling is capped by the single physical core. Software that requires multiple physical cores will not see core-count scaling. The two threads can improve resource utilization in mixed workloads, but the data set provides no percentage for that improvement. The difference between the 8 KB L1 cache and the 512 KB L2 cache also suggests that working sets fitting within the 512 KB L2 cache will be handled entirely by the recorded on-die cache levels, though memory latency and memory bandwidth are not recorded.
FAQ
Q: How many cores and threads are listed?
A: The fact pack lists 1 core and 2 threads.
Q: What is the base clock and is there a boost clock?
A: The base clock is 2.60 GHz. The boostClock field is null, so no boost clock is specified.
Q: What is the TDP?
A: The TDP is 69 W. The data set does not specify a cooler or heatsink tier.
Q: What memory types does it support?
A: Memory support is DDR1 and DDR2. ECC memory is listed as false, and the memory bus and memory bandwidth fields are not populated.
Q: Does it have integrated graphics?
A: The integratedGraphics field says “On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)”. The data does not describe a processor-integrated GPU.
Q: What is the production status and release date?
A: The production status is end-of-life, and the release date is 2003-05-20.
The AMD Equivalent of Pentium 4 HT 2.60
Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.60 Comparisons
See how the Pentium 4 HT 2.60 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Pentium 4 HT 2.60 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs