Intel Celeron N2810

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a Bay Trail-M mobile processor built on Silvermont architecture. The data sheet lists two cores, two threads, a 2000.00 base clock, no boost clock, and a TDP of 7. Its only database-level position is a 50th-percentile ranking across all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest-rival entries. This makes the performance picture mostly architectural: the silicon details are defined, but measured workload scores are absent.

Who Should Consider It

The Celeron N2810 is listed in the Mobile segment, so it fits systems designed for portability and compact integration. With exactly two threads, the processor cannot present more than two logical execution resources; workload recommendations therefore lean toward light, single-task interactive use rather than parallel rendering. The integrated HD Graphics provides the display path, though no graphics benchmark score is included in the record. For office-style work, the two-core/two-thread configuration and 2000.00 base clock are adequate for everyday productivity tasks in a qualitative sense; for creation workloads such as video encoding or 3D rendering, the absence of a boost clock and the two-thread ceiling indicate poor scaling beyond two simultaneous tasks. Gaming is not a focus of this entry: no GPU performance data exists, and the only graphics label is HD Graphics, which is not accompanied by a score. The 50th-percentile all-CPU placement is a neutral signal, but the zero average benchmark score means there is no measured workload result to anchor a speed evaluation. This processor is therefore best considered for basic mobile workloads where low power consumption matters more than high throughput.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals array is empty in the data record. This means the database entry has no named competing processors, no rival scores, and no deltaPct values. Without those entries, the usual comparison framework, “processor A is a stated percent ahead of processor B”, cannot be constructed. The only cross-CPU indicator present is percentileVsAllCpus = 50, which places the N2810 at the midpoint of the database’s CPU distribution. However, because avgBenchmarkScore is 0, that midpoint is not backed by a positive average workload score. A curious side effect is that the 50th percentile makes the Celeron N2810 comparable to half of the database by rank, yet no specific rival names are available. Therefore, any claim about being faster or slower than a particular product is not supported by this data. The comparison story here is one of missing data rather than measured performance deltas.

Platform and Compatibility

The listed socket is Intel BGA 1170. Because the only package interface given is BGA 1170, the upgrade path is tied to this specific board-level package. Memory support is DDR3, while ECC memory support is flagged false. No memory bus width or bandwidth figure is provided, so memory throughput cannot be quantified from this record. PCIe information is absent, leaving the expansion topology unspecified. The integrated graphics block is labeled HD Graphics. The market segment is Mobile, consistent with a low-power, space-constrained platform. Production status is Active, and the release date is 2013-09-10. The multiplier is not unlocked, so frequency adjustment through an unlocked ratio is not part of the feature set. No L3 cache is listed; cache appears as 56 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. This set of specifications describes a compact, integrated mobile design using DDR3 system memory and lacking an ECC path.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Celeron N2810 have?

A: It has 2 cores and 2 threads, meaning the thread count equals the core count.

Q: Does the processor have a boost clock?

A: No boost clock is listed. The base clock is 2000.00, and that is the only frequency value provided.

Q: What memory type is supported?

A: The memory support field lists DDR3. ECC memory support is marked false, so error-correcting memory is not indicated.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, multiplierUnlocked is false.

Q: What socket does it use?

A: It uses Intel BGA 1170.

Q: How much cache is listed for the processor?

A: The cache is listed as 56 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core; no L3 cache is specified.

Power and Thermals

The TDP field is 7. This is a low power envelope, and the data record shows no other power values. With no boost clock, there is no turbo state listed to push the package beyond its base 2000.00 configuration. For cooling, a 7 TDP rating implies a modest thermal solution; no cooler size or cooling package is specified in the data. Because this is a Mobile segment part, the thermal context is likely a compact portable chassis rather than a high-airflow desktop enclosure. The 22 nm process node and Intel foundry are present in the record, though die size and transistor count are not supplied, so thermal density cannot be calculated. Overall, the thermal design point is consistent with a very low-power integrated mobile platform.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

With 2 cores and 2 threads, the N2810 executes with exactly as many threads as cores. There is no simultaneous multi-threading indicated by the thread count. A single-threaded workload can use one core at 2000.00, while a multi-threaded workload has exactly two independent execution slots. The cache layout, 56 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, gives each core its own local cache hierarchy. No L3 value appears in the record, so a shared last-level cache tier is not documented. In single-thread scenarios, the lack of a boost clock means the processor cannot raise frequency above the listed 2000.00 to shorten burst latency. In multi-thread scenarios, performance is capped by the two-thread design: additional concurrent threads would contend for the same two logical slots. The behavioral split is therefore clear from the specification data: this is a chip balanced toward two simultaneous threads rather than high per-core turbo or broad thread parallelism.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark data is unusually sparse. The benchmarks array is empty, and the average benchmark score is 0. The percentileVsAllCpus value is 50, placing this entry exactly at the median of the CPU database. Yet with no nonzero average score, the percentile is not accompanied by a measured workload magnitude. The nearestRivals field is also empty, so there are no rival names and no deltaPct percentages to cite. It is therefore impossible to state that the Celeron N2810 is a certain percent ahead of or behind any competitor. The only exact numeric comparison available is the 50th-percentile rank itself. If the percentile is taken at face value, the N2810 sits squarely in the middle among all CPUs in the database. But the zero average score suggests that this entry may be a placeholder rather than a fully measured result. A cautious interpretation is that the processor’s benchmark position is unverified, and the architectural details are the more reliable evidence of its intended role.