INTEL

Intel Celeron 430

Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores

1
Cores
1
Threads
β€”
GHz Boost
35W
TDP
πŸ–₯️Integrated GPU

Intel Celeron 430 Specifications

βš™οΈ

Celeron 430 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The Intel Celeron 430 features 1 physical cores and 1 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
1
Threads
1
SMP CPUs
1
⏱️

Celeron 430 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Celeron 430 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Celeron 430 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
1800 GHz
Boost Clock
N/A
Multiplier
9x
πŸ’Ύ

Intel's Celeron 430 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Celeron 430 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Celeron 430's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
πŸ—οΈ

Core 2 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The Intel Celeron 430 is built on Intel's 65 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Celeron 430 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Core 2
Codename
Conroe-L
Process Node
65 nm
Foundry
Intel
Transistors
105 million
Die Size
77 mmΒ²
Generation
Celeron (Conroe)
πŸ”’

Core 2 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Celeron 430 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
Intel 64
VT-x
πŸ”Œ

Celeron 430 Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The Intel Celeron 430 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 35W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
35W
πŸ”§

Intel Socket 775 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Celeron 430 uses the Intel Socket 775 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
Intel Socket 775
Chipsets
Intel 975X, P/G/Q965, Bearlake(3x), Eaglelake(4x), nForce 4/500/600/700, VIA PT880 Pro/890/900, SiS 671, ATi RS600, RD600
PCIe
Gen 2
Package
FC-LGA6
DDR5

Intel Socket 775 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the Celeron 430 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Celeron 430 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
πŸ–₯️

Intel's Celeron 430 Integrated Graphics

Built-in GPU specifications

The Intel Celeron 430 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Celeron 430 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.

iGPU
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Graphics Model
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
πŸ“¦

Celeron 430 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The Intel Celeron 430 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Celeron 430 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.

Manufacturer
Intel
Release Date
Jun 2007
Launch Price
$49
Market
Desktop
Status
End-of-life
Part Number
SL9XN

Celeron 430 Benchmark Scores

πŸ“Š

No benchmark data available for this CPU.

About Intel Celeron 430

The Intel Celeron 430, a single-core processor launched by Intel in June 2007, was built on a 65 nm manufacturing process and targeted budget desktop systems. With a base clock speed of 1.80 GHz corrected from the erroneous 1800.00 GHz listing it offered modest computational power suitable for basic computing tasks of its era. As part of the Celeron lineup based on the Conroe architecture, the Intel Celeron 430 lacked advanced features like multiple cores and hyper-threading, limiting its ability to handle multitasking or modern applications. Its 35-watt TDP reflected a relatively energy-efficient design for its time, making it a candidate for small form factor or low-power desktop builds. While not designed for high-performance workloads, this processor served as an entry-level solution for users needing fundamental computing capabilities. It supported Intel Socket 775, allowing compatibility with a wide range of motherboards from that generation. The absence of benchmark data reflects its limited relevance in today’s performance analysis, though historical context places it at the lower end of desktop CPU performance. In workstation environments, the performance of the Intel Celeron 430 (Intel) was highly constrained due to its single-core, single-thread design. Designed for light productivity rather than intensive computational work, it struggled with tasks such as video editing, software compilation, or virtualization. Even in 2007, professional workstations favored dual-core processors, leaving the Celeron 430 relegated to basic office machines or point-of-sale systems. The lack of L2 cache beyond 512 KB further hampered data throughput and responsiveness under load. While stable for word processing, web browsing, and media playback at standard definition, it could not keep pace with evolving software demands. Upgrades to operating systems beyond Windows XP or lightweight Linux distributions quickly exposed its limitations. The Intel Celeron 430 (Intel), therefore, had minimal presence in true workstation deployments, serving instead as a cost-conscious option for non-demanding roles. When assessing price-to-performance value, the Intel Celeron 430 (Intel) offered limited headroom despite its $49 launch price. At the time of release, it competed in the low-cost segment but delivered significantly less performance per dollar compared to its Pentium and Core 2 Duo counterparts. Users seeking better efficiency often found that investing slightly more in dual-core alternatives yielded substantially higher productivity. The processor's value proposition relied heavily on minimal upfront cost rather than long-term usability or upgrade potential. Today, as a vintage component, it holds little monetary or functional value in modern computing contexts. However, historically, the Celeron 430 represented Intel's strategy of segmenting the budget market with stripped-down versions of mainstream architectures. The Intel Celeron 430 (Intel) remains a case study in cost-driven engineering, where affordability came at the expense of scalability and performance longevity. Platform requirements for the Intel Celeron 430 (Intel) centered around the widespread Intel Socket 775, enabling use with multiple chipsets such as G965, P965, and 945GC. Users needed to ensure compatibility with motherboards supporting the 65 nm Conroe-based processors and the required FSB speed of 800 MHz. Memory support was limited to DDR2, typically up to 4 GB across dual channels, constraining overall system bandwidth. Cooling solutions were straightforward due to the 35W TDP, often allowing passive or basic active heatsinks. While the platform was accessible and widely available in 2007, expansion capabilities were limited by the era’s chipset constraints and lack of modern I/O standards. Today, building around the Intel Celeron 430 (Intel) would be impractical for anything beyond retro computing or educational purposes. The platform reflects a snapshot of mid-2000s entry-level PC design, where affordability shaped both performance and upgrade paths.

The AMD Equivalent of Celeron 430

Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Ryzen 5 1400

AMD β€’ 4 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular Intel Celeron 430 Comparisons

See how the Celeron 430 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Celeron 430 with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs