Intel Celeron 2.40
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
Intel Celeron 2.40 Specifications
Celeron 2.40 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Celeron 2.40 features 1 physical cores and 1 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Celeron 2.40 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Celeron 2.40 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Celeron 2.40 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Celeron 2.40 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Celeron 2.40 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Celeron 2.40's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
NetBurst Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Celeron 2.40 is built on Intel's 130 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Celeron 2.40 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
NetBurst Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Celeron 2.40 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Celeron 2.40 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Celeron 2.40 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 73W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 478 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Celeron 2.40 uses the Intel Socket 478 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 478 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Celeron 2.40 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Celeron 2.40 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Intel's Celeron 2.40 Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The Intel Celeron 2.40 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Celeron 2.40 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Celeron 2.40 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Celeron 2.40 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
Celeron 2.40 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About Intel Celeron 2.40
The Intel Celeron 2.40, released back in 2003, still shows up in legacy builds that demand a single‑core solution. At 2.40 GHz on a 130 nm process, its raw clock speed feels modest compared to today’s multi‑GHz cores, but does it still manage everyday tasks? For web browsing, email, and light office work, the chip can scrape through basic HTML and CSS without choking. Its single thread means any modern JavaScript‑heavy site will expose the limits quickly, prompting the question of whether you’re comfortable with occasional lag. The 73 W TDP is surprisingly high for a one‑core part, which translates into noticeable heat on compact cases. Still, the simplicity of the architecture can be an asset when debugging low‑level software on a known platform.
When you ask the Intel’s 2.40 GHz Celeron to run workstation‑grade applications, the answer is blunt: it will struggle. Compiling code, rendering a modest 3D scene, or handling a spreadsheet with thousands of rows will quickly saturate its single execution pipeline. The lack of hyper‑threading eliminates any chance of hidden parallelism, so multi‑tasking feels like a forced queue. Yet for legacy POS systems or embedded control panels that only need a stable OS and a few background services, the chip can be surprisingly reliable. Its 73 W thermal envelope can actually help maintain a steady clock under load, avoiding the aggressive throttling seen on some low‑power designs. The real question is whether you’re willing to accept a workstation that caps out at a few hundred megaflops in synthetic tests.
From a cost perspective, the Celeron 2.40 was marketed as an entry‑level bargain, and that legacy still echoes in the second‑hand market. You can pick up a compatible motherboard and CPU for a fraction of the price of even a modern low‑end chip, which begs the question: does cheapness outweigh performance? For hobbyists building a retro gaming rig or a low‑power NAS, the cheap price tag can be justified by the negligible power draw of the rest of the system. However, the high TDP relative to its performance means you’ll still need a decent cooling solution, adding a hidden cost. The lack of integrated graphics on many Socket 478 boards forces you to source an external GPU, further eroding the budget advantage. In short, the Intel Celeron 2.40 offers value only when you’re targeting very specific, low‑demand scenarios and can tolerate the quirks of an aging platform.
The platform for the Intel’s Celeron 2.40 hinges on the antiquated Socket 478, which limits motherboard choices to legacy boards from the early 2000s. Those boards typically support DDR‑200 memory, a 100 MHz front‑side bus, and BIOSes that lack modern UEFI features, prompting you to wonder if driver support will be a headache. You’ll also need a 133 MHz or 100 MHz system bus configuration to match the CPU’s specifications, otherwise you’ll be throttling the already modest clock. Power supplies should provide a stable 5 V rail capable of handling the 73 W draw without excessive noise, especially if you add a discrete GPU. Expansion options are limited to PCI and early PCI‑X slots, so modern peripherals may require adapters or simply won’t work. In essence, building a system around this chip is a deliberate exercise in retro compatibility rather than a path toward future‑proofing.
- Socket 478 motherboard required
- DDR‑200 memory and 100 MHz FSB
- 73 W TDP demands adequate cooling
- Limited PCI/PCI‑X expansion for modern peripherals
The AMD Equivalent of Celeron 2.40
Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular Intel Celeron 2.40 Comparisons
See how the Celeron 2.40 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Celeron 2.40 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs