Intel Celeron 1100A

The Intel Celeron 1100A is a Desktop processor from Intel, built on the P6 architecture and the Tualatin codename, manufactured on a 130 nm process at Intel. It has one core and one thread, a 1100.00 MHz base clock, and no boost clock is recorded. Cache resources are 32 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2, while L3 cache is absent from the specification. The processor uses Intel Socket 370, a single-channel memory bus, and ECC memory is not supported. It lists 44 million transistors and an 80 mm² die. The market segment is Desktop, the production status is end-of-life, the multiplier is locked, and the part number field lists SL5VQSL5ZESL6CASL6JRSL6RM. The launch MSRP is $79. Its average benchmark score is 0, its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, and its nearestRivals list is empty.

Who Should Consider It

The benchmark record for the Intel Celeron 1100A contains no entries. The benchmarks array is empty, and the average benchmark score is 0. Because there are no measured results, a workload recommendation cannot be anchored to a gaming score, a creation score, or an office score. The only comparative field, percentile versus all CPUs, reports 50, but with no underlying benchmark sample it does not describe a tested workload.

The structural data points to a narrowly scoped desktop processor. It has a single core and a single thread, so it can execute only one software thread at a time. Its base clock is 1100.00 MHz, and there is no boost clock to provide frequency headroom. For workloads that are strictly single-threaded and have modest cache needs, the 32 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 cache define the available on-die storage. A processor with these characteristics does not present a multi-threaded resource; the thread count is exactly one.

For gaming, the record is silent. There is no gaming benchmark in the benchmarks array. Integrated graphics is described as “On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)”, meaning graphics capability is not an unconditional part of the CPU. A system built around this processor would need to rely on the motherboard chipset for any integrated graphics path, and the processor itself has no dedicated GPU block listed. The absence of recorded gaming scores means no relative gaming performance can be stated.

For content creation, the same limitation applies. No creation benchmark is present, and the processor’s single thread offers no parallel execution resource. Any creation workload that depends on multi-threaded scaling would find no support in the thread count. The cache hierarchy consists of 32 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 with no L3; this is the entire on-die cache budget in the data.

For office-type work, the data does not include an office score. The single-channel memory bus is the recorded memory interface, and memory support itself is noted as dependent on the motherboard. That dependency means the actual memory configuration of a given system is not fixed by the processor. The end-of-life production status and locked multiplier further limit its role in a current platform. A builder considering this part should treat it as a Socket 370 desktop processor with no measured performance evidence in this database.

Thus, the Intel Celeron 1100A is a candidate only for a Socket 370 system where the workload is known to be simple, single-threaded, and not graphics-heavy. The data cannot recommend it for gaming, creation, or general office productivity because no scores exist to support those categories.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals field for the Intel Celeron 1100A is empty. There are no rival names, no rival scores, and no deltaPct values supplied in the dataset. Consequently, there is no direct comparison to any other processor in the database.

The percentile versus all CPUs is 50. That number places the processor at the midpoint of the database’s percentile distribution. However, the average benchmark score is 0 and the benchmarks array is empty. The percentile therefore appears without a supporting set of raw benchmark data points; it is not accompanied by rival deltas that could explain how much faster or slower the Celeron 1100A is than any specific competitor.

In the absence of nearest rivals, no paragraph can be written for a rival such as “the Celeron 1100A is X% ahead of [rival]” because no such rival entry exists. The only comparison fields in the record are the percentile and the empty nearestRivals array. The average benchmark score of 0 is not a meaningful performance mean when the benchmark list is empty; it is the value recorded alongside no measurements.

This situation affects the interpretation of every other section. Platform and compatibility characteristics can be analyzed from the specification fields, but performance positioning relative to competitors is not available. The data shows a processor whose database entry has no measured rivals, no deltaPct, and no benchmark scores. Any statement about being faster or slower than a competitor would require inventing data; the database does not contain such data.

Platform and Compatibility

The Intel Celeron 1100A is designed for Intel Socket 370. The architecture is P6, and the codename is Tualatin; the generation field is “Celeron (Tualatin)”. The part was produced for the Desktop market segment.

Memory support is not fixed by the processor specification. The memorySupport field is “unknown” and then defers to the motherboard, with the note “Depends on motherboard”. The memory bus is single-channel, and ECC memory support is false. There is no recorded memory bandwidth value. For a Socket 370 system, the motherboard therefore determines the exact memory type, capacity, and speed; the processor record itself does not list those details.

The PCIe field is null. No PCIe generation, lane count, or controller information is recorded in the dataset. This means the expansion interface for the platform is not defined by the CPU record. The integrated graphics field states “On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)”, indicating that any integrated graphics path is tied to the motherboard chipset rather than being a guaranteed processor feature.

The multiplier is locked, so the user cannot change the clock multiplier to alter the 1100.00 MHz base clock. There is no boost clock field populated, which means the processor’s only listed clock is the base clock. The production status is end-of-life, so this is not a current product line. The release date is not included in the record, and the series field is null, so there is no series-level context for upgrade positioning.

Upgrade path considerations follow from these facts. Because the processor uses Socket 370, any upgrade would have to keep that socket and be supported by the motherboard. Because memory support depends on the motherboard, a prospective platform change would also need to respect the motherboard’s memory limitations. Because the production status is end-of-life, there is no evidence in the data of ongoing supply or roadmap support. The part number field lists SL5VQSL5ZESL6CASL6JRSL6RM, but no additional compatible processor list is provided.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Celeron 1100A use?

A: The processor uses Intel Socket 370.

Q: Does the Intel Celeron 1100A support ECC memory?

A: No. The ECC memory field is false. Its memory bus is single-channel, and memory support is noted as “Depends on motherboard”.

Q: Does the processor have integrated graphics?

A: Integrated graphics is listed as “On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)”. The processor record does not list an on-processor integrated graphics unit.

Q: What are the key manufacturing and cache specifications?

A: The processor is built on a 130 nm process with 44 million transistors and an 80 mm² die. It has 32 KB of L1 cache and 256 KB of L2 cache, with no L3 cache recorded.

Q: What is the processor’s TDP, and what cooling tier does that imply?

A: The TDP is 30. That TDP class implies a low-power cooling tier; the dataset records no specific cooler requirement.

Q: What part number is listed for this processor?

A: The part number field lists SL5VQSL5ZESL6CASL6JRSL6RM.

Power and Thermals

The Intel Celeron 1100A has a TDP of 30. That is the only power-related figure in the data. The 130 nm process, 44 million transistors, and 80 mm² die are the manufacturing context for that TDP. A 30 TDP class is a low-power class, so the implied cooling tier is an entry-level or basic cooling solution. The database does not record a required cooler, a cooler size, a maximum temperature, or a measured power draw. The specification only gives a TDP of 30.

Because the multiplier is locked and there is no boost clock, the processor does not have a dynamic frequency management field in the dataset. The only listed clock is 1100.00 MHz. With one core, one thread, 32 KB L1, 256 KB L2, and no L3, the active silicon area is modest; the die is 80 mm². This combination is consistent with a processor that does not demand an aggressive thermal solution.

The motherboard and chipset will also influence system thermals, since integrated graphics is a chipset feature on certain motherboards and memory support depends on the motherboard. The processor’s own thermal requirement, as expressed by the 30 TDP, remains the starting point for cooler selection. A basic air cooler falls within that class, but the data does not specify fan size, heatsink mass, or liquid cooling compatibility. For system builders, the practical implication is that thermal design should begin with the 30 TDP figure and the motherboard’s capabilities, not with an assumed high-power cooling requirement.