AMD Turion X2 RM-75

The AMD Turion X2 RM-75 is a dual-core mobile processor from AMD’s K10 architecture with the codename Griffin, running at a 2.20 GHz base clock and no listed boost clock. The database record shows 2 cores and 2 threads, a 35 W TDP, an AMD Socket S1 package, and a 65 nm process node. It lists an L1 cache of 256 KB, an L2 cache of 1 MB, and no L3 cache. The benchmark fields are empty, the average benchmark score is 0, and the processor sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs tracked in this database. The nearestRivals list is also empty, so this record contains no direct competitor comparisons.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The RM-75’s thread model is straightforward: it has 2 cores and 2 threads, which means there is no simultaneous-multithreading present. A workload that is limited to a single thread can occupy one core and use the 2.20 GHz base clock as the only known clock speed in the data. Since no boost clock is listed, there is no higher advertised frequency to consider for short single-thread bursts. As a result, single-thread behavior is defined by the 2.20 GHz rate, the K10 architecture, and a cache hierarchy that stops at the L2 with no L3 available.

Multi-thread behavior, by contrast, is defined by exactly two physical execution contexts. Programs that can split into two threads can make use of both cores at the same time. Programs that need more than two threads will have to share those two hardware threads through operating-system scheduling, since the core and thread counts are equal. This is not a processor with spare logical threads; it is a pure dual-core design. The cache structure is also relevant for multi-threaded work: each core has access to the listed 256 KB L1 and the shared total L2 is 1 MB, with no L3 to back it.

For real workloads, the practical consequence is that the RM-75 fits tasks with modest parallelism and moderate single-thread requirements. Single-threaded tasks will depend on the 2.20 GHz figure, while multi-threaded tasks will gain only from two physical cores. The empty benchmark list means the database does not provide measured scores for either case. The 50th percentile placement is the only ranking information: it places the processor exactly at the midpoint of all CPUs in the database. That percentile is an ordinal position, not a performance score, so it should not be read as a specific speed advantage or deficit.

Power and Thermals

The only thermal design figure in the record is 35 W. That is the TDP assigned to the RM-75, and it is the sole power metric available for interpreting cooling requirements. The process node is 65 nm, and the market segment is Mobile, so the processor is positioned for portable systems rather than desktop chassis designs.

The record does not contain any cooler specifications, so a precise cooling tier cannot be selected from the data. What can be stated is that the 35 W TDP, together with a 2-core/2-thread design and a 2.20 GHz base clock, is the thermal context for platform design. The production status is end-of-life, which indicates the part is no longer an active shipping product, but the TDP class remains the relevant data point for existing systems that use it.

The integrated graphics field is also relevant to thermals. It says “On certain motherboards (Chipset feature),” which means the graphics capability in this platform is tied to the motherboard chipset rather than listed as part of the CPU. In that configuration, the 35 W TDP covers the processor itself in the data record; the chipset’s graphics would be outside the CPU’s stated thermal envelope. No foundry, transistor count, or die size is provided, so those manufacturing details cannot inform the thermal picture further.

Who Should Consider It

The RM-75 is best considered for workloads that can operate within the limits of 2 cores, 2 threads, and a 2.20 GHz base clock. The database does not list any gaming benchmark scores, so there is no measured basis for a gaming recommendation. Similarly, the benchmark set contains no content-creation scores, so any creation workload guidance must come from the core and cache details alone. The two-thread ceiling means heavily multithreaded creation applications would be outside the processor’s main strength.

For office-type work, the data shows a dual-thread processor with a dual-channel memory bus and no ECC support. The memory support field is empty, so the specific RAM types and speeds accepted by this platform are not part of the record. The processor’s 50th percentile placement among all CPUs is the only relative ranking available, and the empty benchmark array means that ranking is not backed by workload-level numbers.

This part is aimed at mobile Socket S1 platforms. Its 35 W TDP makes it a low-power option in the database’s terms, and its end-of-life production status means it is relevant mainly for maintaining or updating existing systems rather than for new platform selection. Users who already have a compatible Socket S1 motherboard and need a dual-core 35 W processor without ECC memory are the audience indicated by the record. Buyers looking for measured performance scores, boost capability, or a current production part will not find those qualities in this data.

Platform and Compatibility

The RM-75 uses AMD Socket S1, and the architecture is K10 with the codename Griffin. The generation field is listed as “Turion X2 (Griffin).” The socket is a fixed compatibility boundary: the data does not list any alternate sockets for this processor, so the upgrade path is limited to Socket S1 platforms.

The memory controller path is described as dual-channel. ECC memory is not supported, as the eccMemory field is false. No specific memory support entries are provided, and the memory bandwidth field is null, so peak bandwidth cannot be cited from this record. That leaves the dual-channel bus as the only memory-related specification.

PCIe information is not present. The pcie field is null, so expansion capability through PCIe cannot be assessed from this data. Integrated graphics are listed as a chipset feature on certain motherboards, meaning the presence of display output depends on the motherboard chipset, not on the CPU.

The multiplier is not unlocked, per the multiplierUnlocked field set to false. The part number listed is TMRM75DAM22GG, and the release date is 2008-11-30. Production status is end-of-life, which affects the practicality of any long-term upgrade plan. The data does not include a series name, foundry, transistor count, or die size, so those platform details remain unspecified.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals field in the data is empty. There are no rival processor names, no rival scores, and no deltaPct values anywhere in the record. Because of that, no direct comparison against another specific CPU can be made from this FACT PACK.

The only comparative figure is the 50th percentile among all CPUs. That indicates a central position in the database’s overall ranking, but with no nearest rivals to anchor it, the percentile cannot be translated into a percentage margin over any named chip. No competitor can be said to be ahead or behind the RM-75 from this data.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Turion X2 RM-75 have?

A: It has 2 cores and 2 threads.

Q: What is the base clock speed?

A: The base clock is 2.20 GHz. No boost clock is listed in the data.

Q: What is the TDP?

A: The TDP is 35 W.

Q: What socket does it use?

A: It uses AMD Socket S1.

Q: What cache sizes are listed?

A: The data lists 256 KB of L1 cache, 1 MB of L2 cache, and no L3 cache.

Q: Does the database include benchmark scores for this processor?

A: No. The benchmark list is empty, the average benchmark score is 0, and no nearestRivals or deltaPct values are present.

Benchmark Performance

The RM-75 has no individual benchmark entries in the database. The benchmarks field is empty, and the listed average benchmark score is 0. That average score accompanies an empty benchmark array, so it does not function as a measured result from any specific workload. There is no way to break the processor’s performance into single-thread and multi-thread scores from the record.

The percentile vs all CPUs is 50. That value places the processor at the midpoint of the CPUs tracked in the database. It is the only quantitative ranking available for the RM-75. However, the percentile cannot be converted into an exact percentage lead or deficit because no nearest rivals are listed and no deltaPct values are present.

Because the nearestRivals field is empty, this analysis cannot state that the RM-75 is any percentage faster or slower than another named processor. There are no rival scores to subtract, no deltas to compare, and no benchmark entries to evaluate. The only benchmark-related numbers in the FACT PACK are the 0 average benchmark score and the 50th percentile. Those two figures represent the complete quantitative performance picture: a central ordinal position and no measured score data.