AMD Opteron X2 285
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Opteron X2 285 Specifications
Opteron X2 285 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD Opteron X2 285 features 2 physical cores and 2 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Opteron X2 285 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Opteron X2 285 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Opteron X2 285 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's Opteron X2 285 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Opteron X2 285 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Opteron X2 285's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
K8 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Opteron X2 285 is built on AMD's 90 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Opteron X2 285 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
K8 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Opteron X2 285 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Opteron X2 285 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD Opteron X2 285 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 95W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket 940 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Opteron X2 285 uses the AMD Socket 940 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket 940 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Opteron X2 285 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Opteron X2 285 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Opteron X2 285 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Opteron X2 285 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Opteron X2 285 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
Opteron X2 285 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this CPU.
About AMD Opteron X2 285
The AMD Opteron X2 285 is a dual-core server/workstation processor released in 2006 for the AMD Socket 940 platform. It belongs to the K8 architecture family under the Italy codename, within the Opteron X2 (Italy) generation, and is built on a 90 nm process with 233 million transistors. The base clock is 2.60 GHz; no boost clock is recorded. The part has 2 cores and 2 threads, 128 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache, a dual-channel memory bus, and PCIe Gen 2 connectivity. It is listed as End-of-life. Benchmark records are empty, the average benchmark score is 0, and the all-CPU percentile is 50. No nearest rivals are recorded, so the comparison table for this processor is blank.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals array for this processor is empty. That means the database does not associate any named competitor with the Opteron X2 285, and no rival scores or deltaPct values are available to cite. The only comparative numeric in the record is the percentileVsAllCpus value of 50. On a percentile scale, a value of 50 places the part at the median of all CPUs in the database. Because the benchmark list is empty and the average benchmark score is 0, this midpoint placement is not tied to any measured workload result. The 50th percentile is the only available positional fact: a median rank with no specific rival nearby in the data set.
In records where nearest rivals exist, the deltaPct value would show how far ahead or behind this part is compared with a known alternative. Here no deltaPct value can be derived, because no alternative is listed. The absence of rival data is itself a meaningful statement about the database entry: the Opteron X2 285 is an unpaired record. The empty benchmark array reinforces that. With no scores and no nearest rivals, the comparison section contains no computed deltas and no percentage advantages or deficits.
Power and Thermals
The TDP value is 95. This is the thermal envelope that a Socket 940 heatsink, chassis airflow, and power-delivery design must handle. A 95 TDP part is not a low-power component; it requires a cooling solution rated for that TDP class. The 90 nm manufacturing process and the 233 million transistor count define the physical scale of the die, and the TDP represents the heat that those transistors can generate under load.
No boost clock is recorded, so the processor does not list a higher-frequency thermal state. The 2.60 GHz base clock is the only clock frequency in the data, meaning the sustained thermal demand is anchored to that frequency. The multiplier is not unlocked, so user-controlled clock multiplier adjustment is not available. That makes thermal validation relatively straightforward: the platform must be built for a fixed 95 TDP operating condition rather than a range of user-defined overclocked states. The dual-channel memory bus and PCIe Gen 2 interface are part of the platform electrical environment, though the TDP figure describes the processor package itself. End-of-life status does not lower the thermal requirement; installed systems still need a thermal solution suitable for the 95 TDP class.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark data for this processor is empty. The benchmarks array contains no entries, and the average benchmark score is 0. As a result, no measured performance scores can be reported for this part. With no scores, there are no exact percentage comparisons to any other CPU. The nearestRivals list is also empty, so no deltaPct values exist to express a percentage advantage or deficit.
The only quantitative comparison signal is the percentileVsAllCpus value of 50. That value indicates a median standing in the all-CPU distribution, but because the benchmark array is empty, the percentile is not supported by any recorded benchmark run. The performance-relevant characteristics in the record are the K8 core design, 2.60 GHz base clock, 2 cores and 2 threads, 128 KB L1 cache, 1 MB L2 cache, dual-channel memory bus, and the absence of a boost clock. These are structural and functional parameters, not measured results. The database record therefore supports architectural description but does not support a numeric performance ranking for the Opteron X2 285.
Who Should Consider It
The Opteron X2 285 is classified in the Server/Workstation market segment. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, so its execution capacity is limited to exactly two software threads at a time. Workloads that fit this shape are lightly threaded server or workstation tasks from the K8 generation. A single-threaded office workload would use one core at 2.60 GHz; a second such workload could run on the other core.
For creation workloads, the dual-core layout permits two parallel execution threads. The absence of a boost clock means there is no single-thread turbo state to call upon when only one core is active. For gaming workloads, the two-core/two-thread structure can execute two-thread game logic, but the record lists no integrated graphics, so a separate display device is required for any video output. The platform includes a dual-channel memory bus and PCIe Gen 2, making it a plausible fit for Socket 940 server boards that need a dual-core processor in the installed base. ECC memory is marked false in the record, so error-correcting memory support is not listed as part of the feature set; this is a notable caveat for server deployment. The production status is End-of-life, meaning this is not a target for new system integration. It is best framed as a replacement or maintenance part for existing Socket 940 systems, rather than a processor for parallel workloads that need more than two threads.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The core count and thread count are equal: 2 cores and 2 threads. This means the processor does not expose any extra hardware threads beyond its physical cores, and there is no simultaneous-multithreading layer to hide instruction stalls. Single-thread workloads have one core at 2.60 GHz available, with no boost state to increase the clock for that single thread. The K8 cache hierarchy in the record consists of 128 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache, with no L3 entry listed, so the 1 MB L2 is the last on-die cache before memory.
Multi-thread workloads can use both cores, but only two threads can execute concurrently. A workload with more than two concurrent threads must wait for execution slots on those two cores. The dual-channel memory bus is the listed memory path, providing a two-lane interface between the cores and system RAM. Because the multiplier is not unlocked and no boost clock is recorded, both single-thread and multi-thread behavior are anchored to the same 2.60 GHz base clock. A measured multi-thread result would reflect two independent K8 cores at that clock, not one core running faster thanks to boost headroom. The lack of an L3 entry means cache misses exit the 1 MB L2 toward the memory controller, with the dual-channel bus handling external traffic. The processor's K8 architecture and Italy codename are the defining microarchitecture identifiers behind this dual-core, two-thread execution model.
The Intel Equivalent of Opteron X2 285
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-750 offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD Opteron X2 285 Comparisons
See how the Opteron X2 285 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Opteron X2 285 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs